Hi guys...
Someone has tested the UD3 with Thuban? (1055t or 1090t)... it's just arrived to my hardware store so i wanna know before i buy it.
Thanks guys
Hi guys...
Someone has tested the UD3 with Thuban? (1055t or 1090t)... it's just arrived to my hardware store so i wanna know before i buy it.
Thanks guys
Unknown_Team / Owner-Founder and Overclocker.
Round up 4 Coolers-Thermalright-Thermaltake FRIO-Noctua
I'll test it for you. I have a 1090T on the shelf. It's on Gigabyte's CPU compatibility list though, so it's sure to work.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Thuban CPUs work fine on the 990FXA-UD3 as I expected, Dahaka:
Last edited by Particle; 10-22-2011 at 08:10 AM.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
I would expect all 990FX and 990X boards to support Thuban.
So would I. They all have Thuban on their CPU support lists. That wasn't the point though. He wanted someone to actually test it so he could feel safe in his expenditure, so I did.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
you are a very nice guy particle for doing that.
Thanks Particle, it's nice to see that thuban runs well con the UD3.
My 1055T it's running at 3.9GHz 1.37v for 24/7.
Regards from Chile.
Unknown_Team / Owner-Founder and Overclocker.
Round up 4 Coolers-Thermalright-Thermaltake FRIO-Noctua
Today tested UD7 with my Phenom II X2 555 and after a bit of fun I managed to unlock Cores 0, 2 and 3! End result Phenom II X3 @ 3.95GHz/1.45V ;]Originally Posted by dinos22
Needed F6 BIOS for that! On F5 or older I couldn't unlock that chip.
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55''Samsung LED 3D TV
Time for fun ....going to pick up a 4100 or 6100 Atm.
well see what unlocking does or dosnt with Ud5 ,,
I wonder just how high i can kicks its micro A$s into submision... results coming soon
"AMD...Like the perfect Storm,...Everything needs to be just right"
X555x4SuperCore@4450mhz@1.64v..........
RYZEN 7 1800x/ ASUS ROG STRIX VEGA64/ =EK NICKEL WB, Feser THC 2x360 1x480
X470 Gigabyte Aorus7, Patriot 3400mhz 16gb dual2x8
SSD Samsung 970pro,,860EVO
Yep, works fine. My 24/7 clocks, beats bulldozer in most tasks so why not use this instead of bd.Hi guys...
Someone has tested the UD3 with Thuban? (1055t or 1090t)... it's just arrived to my hardware store so i wanna know before i buy it.
Thanks guys
Temps : -29.9
Os : Win8 DP
When it blows up i will replace it with my BD.
Last edited by rintamarotta; 10-22-2011 at 07:01 PM.
::: Desktop's - Intel *** Intel 2
2 x Xeon E5-2687W *** Intel i7 3930k
EVGA SR-X *** Asus Rampage IV Extreme
96Gb (12x8Gb) G.Skill Trident X DDR3-2400MHz 10-12-12-2N *** 32Gb (8x4Gb) G.Skill Trident X DDR3-2666 10-12-12-2N
3 x Zotac GTX 680 4Gb + EK-FC680 GTX Acetal *** 3 x EVGA GeForce GTX780 + EK Titan XXL Edition waterblocks.
OCZ RevoDrive 3 x4 960Gb *** 4 x Samsung 840 Pro 512Gb
Avermedia LiveGamer HD capture card
Caselabs TX10-D
14 x 4 TB WD RE4 in RAID10+2Spare
4 x Corsair AX1200
::: Basement DataCenter :::
[*] Fibreoptic connection from operators core network
[*] Dell PowerConnect 2848 Ethernet Switch [*] Network Security Devices by Cisco
[*] Dell EqualLogic PS6500E 96Tb iSCSI SAN (40 2Tb Drives + 8 Spare Drives, Raid10+Spare Configuration, 40Tb fail safe storage)
[*] Additional SAN machines with FusionIO ioDrive Octal's (4 total Octals).
[*] 10 x Dual Xeon X5680, 12Gb DDR3, 2x100Gb Vertex 2 Pro Raid1 [*] 4 x Quad Xeon E7-4870, 96Gb DDR3, 2x100Gb Vertex 2 Pro Raid1
[*] Monster UPS unit incase power grid failure backed up by diesel powered generator.
Seems like a nice motherboard to have some nice bench session.
I think that UD3 will be my next motherboard, but until the end of the month i will preserve my actual motherboard.
Regards.
Unknown_Team / Owner-Founder and Overclocker.
Round up 4 Coolers-Thermalright-Thermaltake FRIO-Noctua
I got me a pair of OCZ3FXE20004GK and I have big issues with them.
Is that similar to your issues, or you could not even post?
In general, have anyone ran benchmark with Bulldozer and +2000MHz on the memory? Any special setting needed to run higher frequency?
when i use a gigabyte UD5 990fxa (bios F3 - F6) I hit 4GHz and nb 2600, all the default condition. but when i use my 770 gigabyte can hit 4GHz with the same vCore and 2800 nb all the default condition. all the test using the same proc (X2 555BE).
and i tried to unlock even if only 3 cores. on my UD5 990fxa hit 4GHz at 1.425v vCore and even then test using linx 25loops, but never use prime blend stable. but using 770 gigabyte I can hit 4GHz at 1.375v and pass prime blend even though only 1 hour.
whether the character of the 9xx chipsets are not so good for AM3 proc??
I'm sorry if my english bad....
unbuffered ECC support?
Do any of the new Gigabyte AM3+ boards have ECC ram support in the bios? (i.e. under
DRAM Configuration" there should be an entry "DRAM ECC enable = Turn on ECC" )
I would especially be interested in the 970A-UD3P model.
Thanks,
Bruce
ASUS M5A88-M
FX-8320 cpu
Thermalright XP-90 cooler
12 GB 1333 MHz ECC RAM
Antec Solo Case
As always, ymmv. You're using different memory than I am--I was using some Mushkin Blackline CL7 DDR3-2000 @ 1.65V that hasn't even been for sale in over a year. It worked reasonably well on the 990FXA-UD3 with BIOS F5, but I think I had to relax the timings from 7-8-10-27 to 8-10-10-27 to get it stable(ish?). I wasn't using any secret settings though, I'd just set it to the DDR3-1333 multiplier and leave it on auto so that most timings were set reasonably instead of really loose, then I set timings to manual and adjusted the first four, and finally I put the multiplier up to 1866 and increased HTT enough to get DDR3-2000.I got me a pair of OCZ3FXE20004GK and I have big issues with them.
Is that similar to your issues, or you could not even post?
In general, have anyone ran benchmark with Bulldozer and +2000MHz on the memory? Any special setting needed to run higher frequency?
I only had major problems on older BIOS revisions. No magic buttons or settings were required to get the memory working on F5B or F5 (final).
I haven't seen the option in the BIOS for my 990FXA-UD3 so far, but I haven't been looking for it. I'll try to remember to take a look for you the next time I reboot the system.
Last edited by Particle; 11-07-2011 at 06:48 AM.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
FX 8120 with 990FXA-D3
memory Elixir 4GB/1333 x 2
AIDA64 Tested (4.6 GHz)
cpu-z validated (5.0 GHz)
Why did you skip the FPU V8 test ?
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XTX Phantom Gaming OC
Asus ROG Strix B550-F Gaming Motherboard
Corsair RM1000x SHIFT PSU
32 GB DDR4 @3800 MHz CL16 (4 x 8 GB)
1x WD Black SN850 1 TB
1 x Samsung 960 250 GB
2 x Samsung 860 1 TB
1x Segate 16 TB HDD
Dell G3223Q 4K UHD Monitor
Running Windows 11 Pro x64 Version 23H2 build 22631.2506
Smartphone : Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
I don't skip vp8 test but I forget it to post :p
When are we going to get a bios that gives an option to disable TDP limit for BD? (ud5 my case)
Motherboard: GigaByte P67UD4 f6 | CPU: Intel 2500k 4.5ghz 1.26v | Memory: GSkill 2x4gb @ 1600mhz 1.34v | PSU: SeaSonic X650 Gold 650W | Video: AMD 6970 Koolance water block 880c/1450mem 1.035v | HDD: WD 640gb cavier black: VelociRaptor 300gb: Intel x-25 g2 80gb | Sound: Asus xonar D1 | OS: W7 64bit
that seems to be my problem in ud3 also, any increment in voltages gives me a freeze while booting.
I've tested another board and another power supply and the results were the same...
990FXA-UD3 | FX8350@4.7Ghz | Asus HD7870 | 2x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Tracer 2050Mhz 8-8-8-22 | AX850W |SSD Vertex3 Max IOPS 120GB | Auzentech Forte + TAPCO-S5
EK Supreme Full-Gold | XSPC RX240 + EX120 | MCP35x | 3x Koolance Blue Led @PWM | Tygon Black 1/2 | Bitspower Compression | @ FM CM690 I
CPU FX 8120
MB 990FXA-D3
RAM Elixir 4GB/1333 x 2
PSU Tagan U37 600W
Cooling TT Frio
Last edited by V-FrIeNd; 11-08-2011 at 09:23 AM.
A bit off-topic, but do you need that high CPU-NB voltage and CPU voltage for thoose clocks? CPU-NB +0.100v and CPU +0.150v don't work?
i see the review that 990FXA-UD7 has revision 1.1 mobo with improved vcore loadline
Intel Core i5 6600K + ASRock Z170 OC Formula + Galax HOF 4000 (8GBx2) + Antec 1200W OC Version
EK SupremeHF + BlackIce GTX360 + Swiftech 655 + XSPC ResTop
Macbook Pro 15" Late 2011 (i7 2760QM + HD 6770M)
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) , Huawei Nexus 6P
[history system]80286 80386 80486 Cyrix K5 Pentium133 Pentium II Duron1G Athlon1G E2180 E3300 E5300 E7200 E8200 E8400 E8500 E8600 Q9550 QX6800 X3-720BE i7-920 i3-530 i5-750 Semp140@x2 955BE X4-B55 Q6600 i5-2500K i7-2600K X4-B60 X6-1055T FX-8120 i7-4790K
Don't work
cpu voltage lower that make linx to get the stopped upon error in red.
and vcore +0.150 when start linx my computer was restart.
Anyone have the UD7 with F6 BIOS?!
I want teste it, because on the F5 with PII 1075T a set the Vcore to 1,5v and they show me 1,47 and on LOAD they drop for 1.37v.
And I cant find the LLC in BIOS...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks