Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
Willamette came out at 1.3ghz i believe. and Tualatin did hit 1.4 in the end. willies started doing better at 1.8ish, but still lagged behind.
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
It took them 5 monts to realease a P4 that was faster then any of the P3s (1.7ghz Willamette was the first one that was able to outperform a P3 for good) the inital release of the 1.4/1.5 ghz part where awefull... god damit there even was a 1.3ghz part that sucked so much the quitely removed it form there table...
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
Canceled my order for bulldozer! Sticking with sandy till ivybridge now!
Put 16 cores 16 thread in the equation ...
and you get your response vs Xeon ... Sadly AMD look to have made this architecture only for server and workstation ,,,,
Piledriver is made for increase IPC and performance per core .... now we know what have AMD in mind.. look to Bulldozer as a baseline of the architecture, perf will come next.
Lol, Windows 7 is not even capable of take parts of this architecture yet... it can't recognise the modules as dispatcher for cores/ threads yet .
Last edited by Lanek; 10-13-2011 at 05:15 AM.
CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0
lol.... i mean that's on you. I pointed out performance, and you have twice made excuses for why it would make more sense to get BD over sandy bridge. Maybe in your situation specifically, but as a whole no it really doesn't at all. Especially considering your Thuban is quite a bit faster in most tests not named video rendering
when you read more reviews it becomes more funny
When i'm being paid i always do my job through.
Oh man, the Hitler video was really funny and disturbing at he same time.
Its clear to me that AMD just decided scerw it, we just have to get this processor out, regardless of performace, wattage or otherwise. Release it and let the cards fall were they may. Its painfully obvious that AMD(and bigger companies also, like IBM, Samsung, TI ect) will not catch up to INTC anytime soon soon when it comes to manufacturing. Thats what a monopoly can do for your business, just like MSFT(these two tech giant monopolys are being allowed to stand, why, I dont know). Or at least till we get to the point were the node shrinks stop somewhere ~9nM. Whent the node shrinks slow to a crawl or stop, that will allow the other players to catch up.
AMD clearly is the loser in all of this. Those wattage #s are appalling. Thats trully is the worst thing about this whole mess. Its more than clear their engineering expertise is way behind INTCs, in all facets across the board. Its really suprising to me the stock hasn't acted to the downside more, but I guess its already so low, there just not more downside in it.
As Ive said before, my criteria for success or failure are the adds in PC World from IBUYPOWER and CYBERPOWER. If the FX line could make those advertisements, its a success, if not, then fail. Im really looking forward to the next PC World in the mail. My guess is it wont be there.
I was going to upgrade to one just to run on my chiller, but sadly I will be with my 955 for a while longer.
RussC
My Rig
PII955-C2 3.8GHz, 2.5MHz NB
GSkill 2x2GB DDR3-2400@900MHz
M4A87T Antec 900 Case, Custom Mods x5Fans
Custom Water Cooling: 15x12 3-Core Radiator
4xSunon 4.5W Fans, DD12V-D5 Laing Variable Pump
DD MC-TDX Water Block
700W OZC ModX Power Supply
GB HD6970OC2 Video Card
2x150GB Raptor Raid
Both of you are wrong. Look at M.Beier's links and you'll see P4 Williamette debuted with only two speeds; 1.4 & 1.5 GHz. I know because I had a P4 1.4 GHz Williamette with RDRAM PC-800 that was purchased when those were the only choices available (SDRAM equipped P4 systems hadn't arrived yet). Yes, I learned my lesson from that mistake.
I dont agree, maybe Im alone, who really read most of reviews from all world (to time about 25 reviews). If u use superpi and wprime, yes, u can stay with Thuban. But in real aplications is FX better than Thuban-Photoshop, rendering, compression/decompression, videoencoding, microsoft office, in gaming simillary (in BF3 is FX better!). So, what do u need to proof? No, FX is really better than Thuban. U must more write or tetsing with your hands, no listen some people here. Without experinece is not knowledge ,-).
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
@FlanK3r:
Agree with you .
//I'm using an AMD X6 1090T & still looking for a FX-8120 . Look at this article --> Some real world apps such as 3dsmax renderring show me that a FX8150 is 8% slower than an I7 2600K with a decent headroom for overclocking , not too bad .
any boinc numbers ?
Man from Atlantis(B3D, DH, S|A, 3DC, OCN), MfA(G3D, CH), kaktus1907(XS,TPU,AT) and zennino
SIS 6326 > Ti 4200 > 9800XT > 9800GT > GTX 460
Celeron 366 > Celeron 1700 > Athlon XP 2500+ > E6300 > Q9650
Alice Madness Returns | Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood | Assassin's Creed: Revelations | Batman Arkham City | Battlefield 3 | Bulletstorm | Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 | Crysis 2 | Darkness II | Darksiders | Dead Island | Dead Space | Dead Space 2 | Deus Ex: Human Revolution | Dragon Age Origins | Dragon Age 2 | F.3.A.R. | F1 2011 | Half Life 2 | Hard Reset | Kane & Lynch 2 | L.A. Noire | LEGO: Pirates of the Caribbean | LEGO: Star Wars III: The Clone Wars | LOTR: War in the North | Mass Effect | Mass Effect 2 | Mass Effect 3 | Mini Ninjas | NFS Hot Pursuit | RAGE | Renegade Ops | Skyrim | The Witcher 2 | Tomb Raider: Underworld | Transformers: WFC | Trine 2
" Business is Binary, your either a 1 or a 0, alive or dead." - Gary Winston ^^
Asus rampage III formula,i7 980xm, H70, Silverstone Ft02, Gigabyte Windforce 580 GTX SLI, Corsair AX1200, intel x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb, hp zr30w, 12gb corsair vengeance
Rig 2
i7 980x ,h70, Antec Lanboy Air, Samsung md230x3 ,Saphhire 6970 Xfired, Antec ax1200w, x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb,12gb Corsair Vengence MSI Big Bang Xpower
i remember when there were many people on madonion.com that were bragging about getting these 1.3ghz parts, only to be shocked at how the lower end p3 would outperform them.... it was much like the lead up to this launch. it really made you shake your head wondering what happened. however when they reached 1.8ghz, i bought a p4/rdram system as well... it replaced my coppermine system with 550e running at 770mhz. the 1.3's were dropped very fast.
here's alink for ya. http://ark.intel.com/products/27421/...he-400-MHz-FSB
Last edited by rozzyroz; 10-13-2011 at 12:11 PM.
Bookmarks