Page 20 of 30 FirstFirst ... 1017181920212223 ... LastLast
Results 476 to 500 of 733

Thread: AMD FX-8150 Bulldozer finally tested

  1. #476
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,978
    Quote Originally Posted by Sentential View Post
    ... It wouldn't surprise me at all if they are bought out or bankrupt by the end of this coming year.
    Pass me some of what you are smokin' ...
    One hundred years from now It won't matter
    What kind of car I drove What kind of house I lived in
    How much money I had in the bank Nor what my cloths looked like.... But The world may be a little better Because, I was important In the life of a child.
    -- from "Within My Power" by Forest Witcraft

  2. #477
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Peoples Republic of Kalifornia
    Posts
    1,541
    (First off, I want to apologize in advance if the following comments cause anyone to get upset.)

    Ouch. If these early benchmarks are accurate, this is going to make Fermi's launch look good. Seriously though... there were a lot of signs that were clear as day pointing to Bulldozer being a flop. The price was way too low for the hyped performance claims, combined with the delays, repeated yield problems, and the deafening silence from AMD and their cheerleaders like Charlie over at "rarely-accurate". Then top it off with the arrogance in naming it Bulldozer, implying it's going to 'bury the competition'.... and you have a perfect storm.

    As expected, many of you are having a hard time dealing with being let down, and as SKYMTL mentioned... the 5 stages of grieving are clearly illustrated in this thread.

    This is the one and only post i'll make poking fun at the fanboys even though it would be fun to flood these threads with bulldozer jokes and photochopped images like many here did a couple years ago. Oh the irony.

    "If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government"
    -- Alexander Hamilton

  3. #478
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    73
    Quote Originally Posted by rintamarotta View Post
    Bulldozer is optimized for multi-threading and server market, and server market is where the money comes from to AMD, 16-core 8-module and 12-core 6-module server part's will be succesfull.
    Will be waiting for Piledriver to show true power of Bulldozer arch.


    JF-AMD / Hans de Vries / informal posting: IPC increases!!!!!!! How many times did I tell you!!!

    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    .....}
    until (12th October 2011)

  4. #479
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    831
    Quote Originally Posted by pipoo View Post
    Yeah of course, keep telling yourself that! Im a huge AMD fan (never had an Intel machine, NEVER), but denying something that has peen proved by saying something that has nowhere to come from is just dumb. This time they let me downn. Sorry.
    Well, i do agnowledge that Zambezi is litlebit failure compared what we expected but this arch have alot to tweak before we can say final word if its going to be alot of faster in form of Piledriver, there aint even final bios's released for Zambezi yet.
    Piledriver will indeed show true power of Bulldozer arch, it can be equal or faster than Zambezi it can even suprice us but we dont know till Piledriver gets released, server part is really where amd gets most of its income at the moment.

    Quote Originally Posted by Brice MJ View Post


    I know, i know. I was bit too optimistic at that time about preformance, what is true is that i will still be buying Zambezi cpu's only due its Box, i want still one for candy, one for lollipops and one for screws.
    Last edited by rintamarotta; 10-11-2011 at 05:39 PM.

    ::: Desktop's - Intel *** Intel 2
    2 x Xeon E5-2687W *** Intel i7 3930k
    EVGA SR-X *** Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    96Gb (12x8Gb) G.Skill Trident X DDR3-2400MHz 10-12-12-2N *** 32Gb (8x4Gb) G.Skill Trident X DDR3-2666 10-12-12-2N
    3 x Zotac GTX 680 4Gb + EK-FC680 GTX Acetal *** 3 x EVGA GeForce GTX780 + EK Titan XXL Edition waterblocks.
    OCZ RevoDrive 3 x4 960Gb *** 4 x Samsung 840 Pro 512Gb
    Avermedia LiveGamer HD capture card
    Caselabs TX10-D
    14 x 4 TB WD RE4 in RAID10+2Spare
    4 x Corsair AX1200

    ::: Basement DataCenter :::
    [*] Fibreoptic connection from operators core network
    [*] Dell PowerConnect 2848 Ethernet Switch [*] Network Security Devices by Cisco
    [*] Dell EqualLogic PS6500E 96Tb iSCSI SAN (40 2Tb Drives + 8 Spare Drives, Raid10+Spare Configuration, 40Tb fail safe storage)
    [*] Additional SAN machines with FusionIO ioDrive Octal's (4 total Octals).
    [*] 10 x Dual Xeon X5680, 12Gb DDR3, 2x100Gb Vertex 2 Pro Raid1 [*] 4 x Quad Xeon E7-4870, 96Gb DDR3, 2x100Gb Vertex 2 Pro Raid1

    [*] Monster UPS unit incase power grid failure backed up by diesel powered generator.

  5. #480
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    373
    Quote Originally Posted by Brice MJ View Post


    lol, I cannot believe your sig actually came true.....

  6. #481
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ace Deuce, Michigan
    Posts
    3,955
    So it looks like Terrance was right. The more we post about it, the more ipc decreases
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post

    JF-AMD posting: IPC increases!!!!!!! How many times did I tell you!!!

    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    .....}
    until (interrupt by Movieman)


    Regards, Hans

  7. #482
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    831
    It still has best multi-threaded performance but crappy at single-threaded performance.

    Oh yeah, im bit too optimistic at times

    ::: Desktop's - Intel *** Intel 2
    2 x Xeon E5-2687W *** Intel i7 3930k
    EVGA SR-X *** Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    96Gb (12x8Gb) G.Skill Trident X DDR3-2400MHz 10-12-12-2N *** 32Gb (8x4Gb) G.Skill Trident X DDR3-2666 10-12-12-2N
    3 x Zotac GTX 680 4Gb + EK-FC680 GTX Acetal *** 3 x EVGA GeForce GTX780 + EK Titan XXL Edition waterblocks.
    OCZ RevoDrive 3 x4 960Gb *** 4 x Samsung 840 Pro 512Gb
    Avermedia LiveGamer HD capture card
    Caselabs TX10-D
    14 x 4 TB WD RE4 in RAID10+2Spare
    4 x Corsair AX1200

    ::: Basement DataCenter :::
    [*] Fibreoptic connection from operators core network
    [*] Dell PowerConnect 2848 Ethernet Switch [*] Network Security Devices by Cisco
    [*] Dell EqualLogic PS6500E 96Tb iSCSI SAN (40 2Tb Drives + 8 Spare Drives, Raid10+Spare Configuration, 40Tb fail safe storage)
    [*] Additional SAN machines with FusionIO ioDrive Octal's (4 total Octals).
    [*] 10 x Dual Xeon X5680, 12Gb DDR3, 2x100Gb Vertex 2 Pro Raid1 [*] 4 x Quad Xeon E7-4870, 96Gb DDR3, 2x100Gb Vertex 2 Pro Raid1

    [*] Monster UPS unit incase power grid failure backed up by diesel powered generator.

  8. #483
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    pacific NW usa
    Posts
    2,764
    Quote Originally Posted by rintamarotta View Post
    It still has best multi-threaded performance but crappy at single-threaded performance.

    Oh yeah, im bit too optimistic at times
    i thought you said you had one when you posted that about beating the 2600K and 990x? were you just speaking from opinion?
    _________________________________________________
    ............................ImAcOmPuTeRsPoNgE............................
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    MY HEATWARE 76-0-0

  9. #484
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    how many more hours till N.D.A. be D.E.A.D.
    2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
    GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
    Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
    XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case

  10. #485
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    358
    1:33 to go ?



  11. #486
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,363
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew LB View Post
    though it would be fun to flood these threads with bulldozer jokes and photochopped images like many here did a couple years ago. Oh the irony.
    Amidoinitrite?

    NZXT Tempest | Corsair 1000W
    Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
    Intel i7 2500K Corsair H100
    PNY GTX 470 SLi (700 / 1400 / 1731 / 950mv)
    Asus P8Z68-V Pro
    Kingston HyperX PC3-10700 (4x4096MB)(9-9-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

    Heatware: 13-0-0

  12. #487
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    1,315
    So much for the bulldozer thread from a few weeks back when movieman hyped up the fx like it was way faster than what intel is offering. I had a feeling it was smoke and mirrors
    Phenom 9950BE @ 3.24Ghz| ASUS M3A78-T | ASUS 4870 | 4gb G.SKILL DDR2-1000 |Silverstone Strider 600w ST60F| XFI Xtremegamer | Seagate 7200.10 320gb | Maxtor 200gb 7200rpm 16mb | Samsung 206BW | MCP655 | MCR320 | Apogee | MCW60 | MM U2-UFO |

    A64 3800+ X2 AM2 @3.2Ghz| Biostar TF560 A2+ | 2gb Crucial Ballistix DDR2-800 | Sapphire 3870 512mb | Aircooled inside a White MM-UFO Horizon |

    Current Phenom overclock


    Max Phenom overclock

  13. #488
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,363
    Meanwhile at Dresden...

    NZXT Tempest | Corsair 1000W
    Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
    Intel i7 2500K Corsair H100
    PNY GTX 470 SLi (700 / 1400 / 1731 / 950mv)
    Asus P8Z68-V Pro
    Kingston HyperX PC3-10700 (4x4096MB)(9-9-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

    Heatware: 13-0-0

  14. #489
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    73
    FX8120 is not beating i5 2500 even in many highly MT apps, Game performance comparisons are not even funny

    http://pctuning.tyden.cz/hardware/pr...u-1-2?start=14
    JF-AMD / Hans de Vries / informal posting: IPC increases!!!!!!! How many times did I tell you!!!

    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    .....}
    until (12th October 2011)

  15. #490
    Xtreme Enthusiast Gunslinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Decatur, AL
    Posts
    938
    Quote Originally Posted by Sentential View Post
    Meanwhile at Dresden...

    [img]snip[/img]
    I'd give him a 10 for that epic faceplant.
    Quote Originally Posted by chuchnit View Post
    Why do you always have to bring two sockets into everything?
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman View Post
    Because a one socket system is only 1/2 a system..
    You got two balls don't you?
    I rest my case!


    http://www.usdebtclock.org/

  16. #491

  17. #492
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    North Queensland Australia
    Posts
    1,445
    Ouch...

    -PB
    -Project Sakura-
    Intel i7 860 @ 4.0Ghz, Asus Maximus III Formula, 8GB G-Skill Ripjaws X F3 (@ 1600Mhz), 2x GTX 295 Quad SLI
    2x 120GB OCZ Vertex 2 RAID 0, OCZ ZX 1000W, NZXT Phantom (Pink), Dell SX2210T Touch Screen, Windows 8.1 Pro

    Koolance RP-401X2 1.1 (w/ Swiftech MCP35X), XSPC EX420, XSPC X-Flow 240, DT Sniper, EK-FC 295s (w/ RAM Blocks), Enzotech M3F Mosfet+NB/SB

  18. #493
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Peoples Republic of Kalifornia
    Posts
    1,541
    Quote Originally Posted by rintamarotta View Post
    server part is really where amd gets most of its income at the moment.
    Considering AMD has only 5.5% of the Server CPU market, I doubt that segment is whats keeping them afloat.

    Oh... and there's this:

    Intel’s server processor profit margins were 50% in 2009, versus 10% for AMD.

    "If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government"
    -- Alexander Hamilton

  19. #494

  20. #495
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,978
    Those look suspiciously like the benches from 'the one who we shall not name'....
    One hundred years from now It won't matter
    What kind of car I drove What kind of house I lived in
    How much money I had in the bank Nor what my cloths looked like.... But The world may be a little better Because, I was important In the life of a child.
    -- from "Within My Power" by Forest Witcraft

  21. #496
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    43
    So Bulldozer starts to show its potential in WinRAR and Photoshop benches.. which is exactly what one should expect with 8 *integer* cores. Parallel integer workloads (think: SERVER) is where this thing will shine. (And probably special HPC apps that are designed for FMAC4).

    That's probably why they released it as "FX", unlocked, processors for consumers. Since it's mainly fun for overclockers. Low IPC and only 4 FP cores isn't great for PI and Cinebench

  22. #497
    PerryR
    Guest
    Whelp, this is thing is possibly one of the worst releases this year. If current reviews are an indication.

    At least we know why JF-AMD has been absent! LOL!

  23. #498
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Romania, lab501.ro
    Posts
    1,707
    What a surprise...our results were 100% accurate (...again), the BIOS version was good, the silicone version was good, and the numbers that other got were exactly the same as anybody else.... Or, as Vr-Zone said...
    Clock for clock in multithreading heavy scenarios the FX-8150 is typically behind the quad core i7-2600K by ~20%, and in single-threaded workloads it gets totally annihilated. Overclocking was also nothing to shout about, as it needed a significant voltage bump to even reach a (prime stable) 4.7GHz on noisy air. Bluntly, the performance we are seeing from the 8-core FX-8150 today is only marginally better than last year's high end quad core Intel i7 "Nehelam" and AMD's own Phenom II "Thuban" 6-core offerings, and definitely not a "i7-990X killer" as hyped over the last few months. No disrespect intended to the record holders but disabling cores to achieve high frequencies is just going to confuse unsuspecting buyers and split-second CPU-Z screenshots is not a measure of true stability.
    Weissbier - breakfast of champions



  24. #499
    Aussie God
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    4,596
    Quote Originally Posted by Monstru View Post
    What a surprise...our results were 100% accurate (...again), the BIOS version was good, the silicone version was good, and the numbers that other got were exactly the same as anybody else.... Or, as Vr-Zone said...
    In you, I have faith
    Didnt question the results, but certainly question AMDs future for desktop/workstation segment.... Oh and their marketing, 0 overclocking samples and 1 press samples for this country, thumbs up, they really did count on success..
    Competition ranking;
    2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
    2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
    2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
    2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)

    Spectating;
    2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!


  25. #500
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,586
    You're a legend to us Monstru, breaking rules


Page 20 of 30 FirstFirst ... 1017181920212223 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •