So tell me do you know the performance increase the patch will give you on win7 vs an unpatched version?
And pls no NDA BS since a percentage from a unknown number is still unknown.
So tell me do you know the performance increase the patch will give you on win7 vs an unpatched version?
And pls no NDA BS since a percentage from a unknown number is still unknown.
See you on Wednesday.Originally Posted by Hornet331
-
If those results are real and the tested unit is a final one with latest BIOS, MB and drivers... then the results are pretty dissapointing.
BD runs very hot, it's much slower than a 2600K and its mono-core performance is very poor ( 20s in SuperPI? omg... worse than a Core2! )
In fact, I have doubts even comparing it with a Phenom II X6 ... because it will perform more or less than that but it will be much more expensive.
Last edited by jogshy; 10-10-2011 at 03:54 PM.
Please don't tell me you're really citing Superpi as an end-all-be-all of single core performance testing, especially as a direct comparison between Intel and AMD CPUs...If those results are real and the tested unit is a final one with latest BIOS and MB... then the results are pretty dissapointing: BD runs very hot, is much slower than 1-yr old CPU like the 2600K and its mono-core performance is very poor ( 20s in SuperPI? omg... worse than a Core2! )
The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
Nice way to cop out.
No, it's a nice way to not to breach the NDA what we've signed.Nice way to cop out.
-
If these results are true, we are at the mercy of Intel’s prices for years to come
Mobo: Gigabyte EX58-UD3R | CPU: Intel i7 920@4.2Ghz | Mem: Mushkin 1600 3x2gb | PSU: Corsair HX850 | GPU: x2 GTX 460 1Gb SLI | Vista Win7 X64
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks