Quote Originally Posted by gosh View Post
If Lab501 is right then this is fake:

http://www.ozeros.com/2011/10/nuevos...e-el-i7-2600k/

I don't think AMD present fake numbers to customers, they may select apps that runs well on the product that is presented but they can't fake it
Hold on... there is something really weird with the graphs:

(1) http://img.ozeros.com/noticias/2011/...500K_2600K.jpg

(2) http://img.ozeros.com/noticias/2011/...150_slide3.jpg

In the first Bulldozer is ~20% faster than 2600K in wPrime 32M. However, in the second it's 20% slower than 2600K. Same for other graphs, e.g. in the first 2600K is faster @ Winrar 4, second shows Bulldozer being faster. How come?