MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 4519

Thread: AMD Zambezi news, info, fans !

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    I wouldn't bother launching it if this was the case. They (reviews) will generate a lot of negative buzz even if the mythological "fix" eventually arrives.
    Quote Originally Posted by demonkevy666 View Post
    how do we know pre-caching is working or not ?
    correction Prefetch, or is it trace cache. all i know after reading is it's 8Kbyes for the module and 4Kbytes to each core. -__-

    i am so lost on bulldozers lol
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by demonkevy666 View Post
    correction Prefetch, or is it trace cache. all i know after reading is it's 8Kbyes for the module and 4Kbytes to each core. -__-

    i am so lost on bulldozers lol
    You maybe mean the write (combining) buffer to the L2 which is needed because the L1 is write through?

  3. #3
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by Opteron146 View Post
    You maybe mean the write (combining) buffer to the L2 which is needed because the L1 is write through?
    i spent most the day looking for it yesterday it was trace cache.
    even sandy bridge using something similar
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    103
    Quote Originally Posted by demonkevy666 View Post
    i spent most the day looking for it yesterday it was trace cache.
    even sandy bridge using something similar
    Then keep looking as it's called write coalescing cache.
    The other one is related to the instruction cache (instead of data cache).
    Last edited by dess; 10-08-2011 at 01:10 PM. Reason: spelling

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    23
    What I can“t understand from an engineering stand point:

    FX-8150: 294mm²
    i7 2600K: 216mm² with IGP

    Of corse we don“t know the transistor count in FX-8150 or the density of Globalfoundries process, but still is a major difference in die size for less overall performance (assuming the leaks are from a final plataform).

    May XOP and FMA4 be responsible for this die size?
    Sn0wm@n

    most drivers errors are really human errors ...

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    73
    Quote Originally Posted by memmem View Post
    What I can“t understand from an engineering stand point:

    FX-8150: 294mm²
    i7 2600K: 216mm² with IGP
    http://www.hardwarebenchnews.com/wp-...r_Die_size.png

    315mm²

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •