I really do not understand.
Over the years 2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005 Intel always pursued the supremacy, leadership in computer chips. Always behind AMD, and did not care to keep selling processors at a price of U.S. $ 1000 when his performance was ridiculous compared to its counterpart AMD FX.
Today are some extra data that show that AMD FX returns are not complete. And it becomes a big scandal, trying to guess whether they are true or not. And if Intel is defeated or not.
Wow guys! it seems that you have shares in Intel, defend it as I would defend my business.
Let the reviews show us the reality, but we must admit not all sites are neutral. So the best judge the performance of the FX brand will be us.
Not a fanboy of Intel trying to hide under the argument of "Hey I'm a fan of AMD."




Reply With Quote
Bookmarks