Amd Officially Benches Bulldozer

[jimbo75]

Come on Muz. You think someone took the hours to fake them ALL? I think they're accurate.

For the past 6 months i expected the 8150 to beat the 2600K in Multithreaded apps and get killed in Gaming which is what i see here. I also have to point out the 980X runs at 3.3Ghz with a 3.6Ghz turbo and the 8150 runs at 3.6Ghz with a 4.2Ghz turbo.

Where is this "killed in gaming" you are seeing here?

[Pestilence]

Then I will apologise but lets say I noticed a tone from you in more than one AMD thread and that is what brought my comment
Now as to you from your sig:
2500K @ 5Ghz 1.40v - Hyper 212+
Asus MIVE
EVGA GTX 470's in TRI
AX1200
Why the hell do you want to upgrade?
Your current, good gear, no need.
Save your money for the next round.

No need to apologize at all bro. Why would i want to upgrade? I love to waste money and if i don't spend it my fiance will.

Where is this "killed in gaming" you are seeing here?

Gaming results were with a pair of 6790's. Can you say gpu bottleneck?

[undone]

We haven't heard it is shipping because we don't have desktop JF among us
I guess it would be safe to say that with those boxes of Interlagos to Cray, there were some smaller boxes going to some of the Desktop builders Or at least to some regional warehouses(if AMD has such things).

And I also heard from some NDA-signer(they indeed have ES chips)one month ago, that release is on September, now it becoming pipe dream.

When you go over these cases that happened in the past few months you can find a lot of bullshxt, maybe they were not lying, even when their statements are conflicting each other, even the slides themselves are 'ever true'. But now, I regard these all as obsolete one just like those rediculous roadmap, changing frequently.

I don't know what amd is doing, seems they are trying hard to broadcasting the launch is 'coming soon', but what they really prepared is not, instead they're keeping silent with some slides and roadmap spreading out.

Now just wait, if we cannot receive the Zambezi shipping news in upcoming weeks, there will be a serious case, that AMD is intentionally lying to the whole world including some insiders.

[muziqaz]

undone, I didn't say they are launching in September, and I am one of those who don't believe in September launch. But I do believe(and that's my opinion) that FX chips shipped or are going to be in very short time.
And stop with all the moaning about how AMD does not tell everything to you

[Dimitriman]

Then I will apologise but lets say I noticed a tone from you in more than one AMD thread and that is what brought my comment
Now as to you from your sig:
2500K @ 5Ghz 1.40v - Hyper 212+
Asus MIVE
EVGA GTX 470's in TRI
AX1200
Why the hell do you want to upgrade?
Your current, good gear, no need.
Save your money for the next round.

Because he was never going to upgrade? His "upgrade" and "I have owned an AMD processor in the past" are his excuses to beat down on every AMD benchmark that shows up. He is only here to amuse himself at every benchmark that shows his Intel system being faster than AMD's new processors. Or am I the only one noticing this?

[jimbo75]

Gaming results were with a pair of 6790's. Can you say gpu bottleneck?

And your explanation for this slide is?

[Final8ty]

Because he was never going to upgrade? His "upgrade" and "I have owned an AMD processor in the past" are his excuses to beat down on every AMD benchmark that shows up. He is only here to amuse himself at every benchmark that shows his Intel system being faster than AMD's new processors. Or am I the only one noticing this?

He does come across like that and some people who have just bought a 2500K system wouldn't want the AMD to be faster after just forking out.
Its very common across forums and i have found that when there is a big moaner its seems too be 2500K user.

[informal]

Gaming results were with a pair of 6790's. Can you say gpu bottleneck?

Where did you see the system configuration? And GPU bottleneck at 19x10?? Really?

[Hornet331]

Greate.. the most interesting slides 30-32 are not up....

[informal]

Greate.. the most interesting slides 30-32 are not up....

My thoughts exactly ... And why didn't they list which model number from FX lineup was used for compute intensive apps?? All other slides (ie. gaming) have model numbers on them,for both intel and AMD. For compute ones they put juts "FX",no model number at all... Can be FX8150 of course,but we don't know since system configuration slide from "back up" deck is missing.

[undone]

undone, I didn't say they are launching in September, and I am one of those who don't believe in September launch.

September fade away, now do you believe October launch?

And stop with all the moaning about how AMD does not tell everything to you

Not everything, but anything.

[Pestilence]

Because he was never going to upgrade? His "upgrade" and "I have owned an AMD processor in the past" are his excuses to beat down on every AMD benchmark that shows up. He is only here to amuse himself at every benchmark that shows his Intel system being faster than AMD's new processors. Or am I the only one noticing this?

So you know this for a fact how? I didn't know we had mind readers on his forum and ill gladly provide pics of former systems if you need absolute proof. Let me pose a question to you since you seem like the typical whiny Amd fan. Why are you so butthurt over intel and its owners? I can't remember intel fans being like this when Amd was on top during the crapburst days.

[Lanek]

why do you want he's an AMD fanboy ?

[~CS~]

I think AMD will launch just before the new year shopping season,would make most sense,things are moving slow atm.

[muziqaz]

September fade away, now do you believe October launch?



Not everything, but anything.

I myself would be glad to get this CPU before xmas. Nothing else. I would love to replace my thuban with something new and more exciting, but I have other things to do in life, thus I can wait

[cold2010]

Bla Bla







this my test

[informal]

cold2010 and the point of that picture is what exactly? We do know how 2600K performs ,there are million of reviews. Note the thread title,it's about FX Bulldozer,not Sandy Bridge. Thanks.

[Tha Last Meal]

COLD

Ryūjin Jakka

[Hornet331]

Wonder if intel will throw out a 4core HT SB at a 200€ price point, would be right between 2500 and 2600. Considering that it seems (for now) the new top AMD cpu aims for that spot.

[uOpt]

cold2010 and the point of that picture is what exactly? We do know how 2600K performs ,there are million of reviews. Note the thread title,it's about FX Bulldozer,not Sandy Bridge. Thanks.

The pic holds the Intel numbers to compare to the Bulldozer numbers right on top.

Looks kosher to me.

Putting them all into one neat table might be nicer.

[demonkevy666]

The pic holds the Intel numbers to compare to the Bulldozer numbers right on top.

Looks kosher to me.

Putting them all into one neat table might be nicer.

just needs a power used comparisons. imo

[flesheatinvirus]

I hope those numbers get better, time will tell.

[undone]

Some guys noticed that amd ran an OPENCL BENCHMARK with FMA4 INSTRUCTION SET.

http://www.donanimhaber.com/islemci/...onuclari_8.htm


My knowledge telling me, accelerate opencl with any instruction set is MIRACLE.

[Lokinhow]

Some guys noticed that amd ran an OPENCL BENCHMARK with FMA4 INSTRUCTION SET.

http://www.donanimhaber.com/islemci/...onuclari_8.htm


My knowledge telling me, accelerate opencl with any instruction set is MIRACLE.

Please, can you elaborate?

[Mechanical Man]

Please, can you elaborate?

Maybe he does not know OpenCL can be run on CPU too...