But will it work on am3 mobo,or only am3+?
But will it work on am3 mobo,or only am3+?
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
Last edited by Canis-X; 09-16-2011 at 05:43 AM.
Asus Rampage IV Extreme (Cooled by EK)
3930k (still dialing it in) (Cooled by: summer time= HeatKiller / winter time= ss phase)
Samsung 30nm 32gig (still dialing it in)
2x GTX 590 Quad-SLI (Cooled by XSPC)
128GB Crucial SSD
1200w PCP&C
The info I have offered is all I can legally disclose at this time so don't take it as me being rude and not answering questions.
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
INTEL 2600K @ 4.5ghz 24/7 Corsair H100
ASUS P8Z68-V PRO
2 x CORSAIR 4GB DDR3 1600 (CL8)
4TB Seagate SATA2
SAPPHIRE 7950 (GPU 1100 | MEM 1500)
Cosmos S
Asus XONAR DX
Corsair 850W PSU
Great news guys, the noname blogger says his pal Peter sent him some tests comparing IPC between BD and Thuban at 4.2Ghz no turbo (1 thread)
SuperPI +22% for Thuban
Cinebench 10 +13% for Thuban
Cinebench 11.5 +23% for Thuban
wPrime 32M +42% for Thuban
Fritzchess (both 6 threads) +24% for Thuban
Seriously Its too unbelievable to be believable![]()
_________________________________________________
............................ImAcOmPuTeRsPoNgE............................
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
MY HEATWARE 76-0-0
Still these are from an ES chip. chew* and JF said that we shouldn't believe them.
Source: http://www.overclock.net/amd-cpus/11...aunch-faq.html
Q. I saw a benchmark on xyz website. Is that how bulldozer will perform?A. No. Nothing posted before launch will be representative of actual performance. To get actual performance, you need:
Final production silicon
Final processor microcode
Final system BIOS
Final OS optimizaitons
Final drivers
An app compiled with the latest flags
A person who understands the app and configures the test properly
Without these things (and there are probably more), you cannot get an accurate benchmark. Any extrapolation of a crappy benchmark gives you a crappy estimate of actual performance. Period.
Oh, and many of the benchmarks that you see were probably not run, those are just charts made in excel. It's really easy to make a chart in excel - what do you want, bulldozer faster by 3716%? Intel faster by 293%? Sure, I can do either one in 10 seconds. Why are you arguing about benchmarks that probably aren't real?
Asus Rampage IV Extreme (Cooled by EK)
3930k (still dialing it in) (Cooled by: summer time= HeatKiller / winter time= ss phase)
Samsung 30nm 32gig (still dialing it in)
2x GTX 590 Quad-SLI (Cooled by XSPC)
128GB Crucial SSD
1200w PCP&C
Canis-X Actually I am waiting for chew* to classify It as the biggest BS ever.
Dresdenboy No, he tested It on GigaByte GA-990FXA-UD7 and the bios was F5 and that is with
AGESA 0.0.9.2 from the info on gigabyte homepage.
Ok, I keep seeing AGESA lately, what is it and what does it do? How does it impact a CPU?
Asus Rampage IV Extreme (Cooled by EK)
3930k (still dialing it in) (Cooled by: summer time= HeatKiller / winter time= ss phase)
Samsung 30nm 32gig (still dialing it in)
2x GTX 590 Quad-SLI (Cooled by XSPC)
128GB Crucial SSD
1200w PCP&C
Canis-X If I am not mistaken, with AGESA code they blocked TLB bug in Barcelona which resulted in weaker performance.
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
As simple as this.....If your FX8150 too slow then sell it or return it for refund or you can wait untill it available for purchase.
Any overclocking results up to this second are not from "retail ready cpu" and should be view as an "engeneering sample" results
Bookmarks