Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
Well if Opteron 6220 results are true ,as xsecret claims,then C11.5 result should roughly follow the same route as the Sisoft's MM benchmark.I say roughly since I have no idea what is the ratio of memory and SIMD instructions in these tests. If it does have similar ratio,then instead of 5.24pts one should have 1.67x the result of 1100T if he would to run C11.5 on FX8150 @ 3.6Ghz.Or in numbers : 9.85pts.
9.85pts is dangerously reminiscent of this (early slide detailing Scorpius platform and Zambezi advantage over Thuban in 3 benchmarks;slide was from Dec 2010 and was pointing roughly at 10pts in C11.5 for 8C Zambezi @ unknown clock).
I think you rrrrrreally need to move on from comparing everything to the server variants. They might be mostly the same, but I suspect there is enough of a difference for them to perform rather far apart from each other.

I also suck at math, but that link says 1.5x greater than 1100T, which if you use XSecret's 5.8 score you get 8.7m not 9.85. Which goes right back to comparing server stuff, as now even comparing unknown systems brings in way too many variables I think, especially when it comes to BIOS versions between board makers.