Results 1,726 to 1,750 of 4519

Thread: AMD Zambezi news, info, fans !

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,782
    Quote Originally Posted by TESKATLIPOKA View Post
    freeloader yet you are still missing 10-20% of performance, thats a lot not to mention what they added was just a second cluster which means only 20% bigger core size without L2 cache, true 2 core without sharing would mean 100% bigger core size on a die.
    something like this(without L2 cache)
    module without one integer(no sharing, everything can be used by one integer cluster) 15.58mm2
    module design 19.4mm2
    2 core design 2*15.58mm2=31.16mm2
    The performance gain per area increase is worth the performance penalty but comparing it to a regular 8 core is not right in my opinion thanks to the penalty hit.
    Too me it's no different than Intel classifying it's parts as having 4 cores/8 threads. Bulldozer's turbo function will also make up for some of the 10 to 20% deficiencies in a multi threaded work load, however no processor (that I'm aware of) with a shared cache system can obtain a 100% unified work load over two cores on the same die. (cache latency, cache miss, operating system overhead, etc, etc...)
    Last edited by freeloader; 08-26-2011 at 05:34 PM.
    As quoted by LowRun......"So, we are one week past AMD's worst case scenario for BD's availability but they don't feel like communicating about the delay, I suppose AMD must be removed from the reliable sources list for AMD's products launch dates"

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •