MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 206

Thread: AMD Officially Denies Bulldozer Delay !

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,782
    Quote Originally Posted by charged3800z24 View Post
    I don't Agree, I feel the move to release Liano and focus attention on it is a better move. This APU has far more real world usage and will net more sales then BD desktop chips. I build a lot of HTPC's and have used the current Zacate a lot and look forward to Liano. Leaking BD results on a rev that isn't optimal would not spur any sales.
    Which chip has the higher profit margins? Just an FYI, it's Llano, not Liano. No one at AMD needs to release any benchmark numbers per se, but a general statement such as, "BD competes rather nicely against SB" or "BD bests current Intel offerings". Just my 2 cents worth.

    BTW...AMD won't even tell anyone whether the delay is due to performance problems or whether they're just using GF's maximum capacity for Llano and have put BD on delay. I'm guessing the latter.
    Last edited by freeloader; 06-02-2011 at 06:16 PM.
    As quoted by LowRun......"So, we are one week past AMD's worst case scenario for BD's availability but they don't feel like communicating about the delay, I suppose AMD must be removed from the reliable sources list for AMD's products launch dates"

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •