Quote Originally Posted by Gilgamesh View Post
For me, this was a good opportunity to reveal that Ocz tests its ssd with 85% of total drive capacity and not with "whole drive used for test file"
Your post was in response to mine. And IOMeter tests had nothing to do with my post. The CDM/AS SSD results that users are starting to post are the same or slightly less then what I am getting with the Solid 3 drive. So users are paying a $30.00 - $40.00 premium for a product that brings nothing more to the table over the Solid 3. And as long as you are going to quote OCZ specified performance claims why not also post that AS SSD results are also shown? Or would this not fit the current agenda?