Those are very nice charts Ao1
The SF compression chart is just like I figured it would be, quite interesting as the drive is being throttled as well.
Those are very nice charts Ao1
The SF compression chart is just like I figured it would be, quite interesting as the drive is being throttled as well.
-
Hardware:
80%, 2 reallocated sectors, 37.5TB. Switching to the new software.
Intel have posted a link to a very interesting white paper:
http://www.usenix.org/event/hotstora...pers/Mohan.pdf
It talks about the impact of the frequency of writes.
Longer recovery periods between writes can significantly boost endurance, allowing blocks to potentially undergo several millions of P/E cycles before reaching the endurance limit.
(Its not going to happen in our test)![]()
Last edited by Ao1; 05-27-2011 at 05:41 AM.
We didn't agree on the random part, it's set to 1000ms per loop by default.
1000ms = 20-30MB? on the Intel's, is that something we can agree on or do we wan't more?
--
I've finally reached 30TB +
30.18TB Host writes
Media Wear out 82
Re-Allocations still at 4
@Ao1
Interesting link, will do some reading.
-
Hardware:
Here is some more info
P/E specs are based on the minimum.
http://www.jedec.org/sites/default/f...JESD47H-01.pdf
Delta between most-worn and least-worn Flash blocks: 11
Approximate SSD life Remaining: 92%
Number of bytes written to SSD: 26,432 GB
Really nice to see Intel g3 with 25nm nand beat g2 with 34nm nand! !
Delta between most-worn and least-worn Flash blocks: 12
Approximate SSD life Remaining: 91%
Number of bytes written to SSD: 28,352 GB
Edit:
Another interesting snipet from the Intel forum:
"Read disturb refers to the property of Nand that the more a block of Nand is read, the more errors are introduced. A brief note about Read Disturb (and other various Nand properties) are discussed in this technical note from Micron:
http://download.micron.com/pdf/techn...and/tn2917.pdf
Static data that is read frequently will eventually need to be refreshed or relocated before it reaches the Read Disturb limit because of this Read Disturb property."
Last edited by Ao1; 05-27-2011 at 11:36 PM.
Bookmarks