interesting pictures, since they are officially shipping the mobile parts this comes with no surprise. The E2 is however something i didn't expect to be there yet....Originally Posted by Macadamia
interesting pictures, since they are officially shipping the mobile parts this comes with no surprise. The E2 is however something i didn't expect to be there yet....
no, i cant see the pics ur posting.
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
I had to click the link to see the pics (only padlock pics would show up) and then afterward, they popped up in Macadamia's post
HP Pavilion dv6-6110 590euros
15.6" A6-3410MX 1.6Ghz/2.3Ghz Turbo (quad-core)
6GB DDR3
500GB HDD
HD6520M + HD6750M CF
Win7 Home Premium 64bit
http://www.passiontec.de/_fenster.ph...&affId=1376965
Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
| Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"
Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)
Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
Reality check
Delivery in late june.
Nice anyway.
that would be a very nice config for that price, the only thing bad on this is the screen res.
15.6" 1366x768, i don't find it a problem. 16" start 1600x900 but with this "small screens" do it really matter high res? For web browsing can be difficult to read, 17-18" 1600x900 seems more reasonable.
I prefer 100x if instead or more resolution they choose high quality LCD-LED screens.
Last edited by Nintendork; 05-24-2011 at 12:36 AM.
Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
| Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"
Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)
Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
Reality check
I'm hoping for a redress of the 13" E350 laptops, maybe their forray into the Intel CULV market.
1366x768 is like looking throught a key hole, a lot of scrolling up and down.
It's ok on a 12", but on a 15" it's and utter joke.
The laptop market is so weird, lots of cheap models with discrete graphics I don't care about, but it's so hard to find higher resolution.
Last year I checked if Asus had a 15.6" model with higher resolution, but I couldn't find a single one.
so with digitimes releasing these prices, I feel one can now accurately guess bulldozer's performance:
the quad core bulldozer will be more expensive than 2500k. and I feel like the unique features on either side cancel each other out (onboard video versus ecc support)
I'd say that means bulldozer will, in fact, be slightly faster than sandy bridge. clap clap.
the high price of the quad to me sounds like low threaded workloads are still dictating prices these days, and since the TDP is 95w for all core counts (4/6/8 excluding the 8130P), im thinking the quad is going to be a few hundred mhz faster than the others, making it a great gaming cpu.
2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case
so 30 bucks premium for the unlocked 8core vs the locked one...
in the central EU we have a difference of 10euros between the locked 2600 and the unlocked 2600k SB.
how comes AMD wants to charge 30 bucks just so the cpu is unlocked...do the Bulldozer oc that that good
...so that you basically have to have the unlocked one
---
---
"Generally speaking, CMOS power consumption is the result of charging and discharging gate capacitors. The charge required to fully charge the gate grows with the voltage; charge times frequency is current. Voltage times current is power. So, as you raise the voltage, the current consumption grows linearly, and the power consumption quadratically, at a fixed frequency. Once you reach the frequency limit of the chip without raising the voltage, further frequency increases are normally proportional to voltage. In other words, once you have to start raising the voltage, power consumption tends to rise with the cube of frequency."
+++
1st
CPU - 2600K(4.4ghz)/Mobo - AsusEvo/RAM - 8GB1866mhz/Cooler - VX/Gfx - Radeon 6950/PSU - EnermaxModu87+700W
+++
2nd
TRUltra-120Xtreme /// EnermaxModu82+(625w) /// abitIP35pro/// YorkfieldQ9650-->3906mhz(1.28V) /// 640AAKS & samsung F1 1T &samsung F1640gb&F1 RAID 1T /// 4gigs of RAM-->520mhz /// radeon 4850(700mhz)-->TRHR-03 GT
++++
3rd
Windsor4200(11x246-->2706mhz-->1.52v) : Zalman9500 : M2N32-SLI Deluxe : 2GB ddr2 SuperTalent-->451mhz : seagate 7200.10 320GB :7900GT(530/700) : Tagan530w
Is unlocked even needed for a air cooled machine, when you've got those high multipliers?
Let's say stock speed is 18 x 200 MHz, a 50 % overclock would be 18 x 300 = 5400 MHz. I doubt you can go higher on air..
AAbenson, all FX processors are unlocked. And even then, you should be able to overclock any of these processors, regardless of locked or unlocked multipliers.
so you will keep posting this overview in everythread ?so with digitimes releasing these prices, I feel one can now accurately guess bulldozer's performance:
the quad core bulldozer will be more expensive than 2500k. and I feel like the unique features on either side cancel each other out (onboard video versus ecc support)
I'd say that means bulldozer will, in fact, be slightly faster than sandy bridge. clap clap.
FAKE OVERVIEW
Why fake if I may ask?so you will keep posting this overview in everythread ?
FAKE OVERVIEW
SweClockers.com
CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
GPU: HD 5770
i thought FX just means the BD chips, and the P was if its unlocked
2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case
From link http://siliconinvestor.advfn.com/rea...msgid=27393140
"All the four Zambezi processors will come as Black Edition parts, meaning they feature an unlocked multiplier for higher overclocking headroom."
Why would an unlocked model have 30w higher TDP if it was just unlocked? I think I read that the P-model is a higher clock and/or turbo.
Last edited by richierich; 05-24-2011 at 07:45 AM.
because it also comes higher clocked. like 1055T vs 1090T, huge price difference, because it was unlocked and faster
whats the point of the P in there when they could have just called it the FX-8130, its not like thuban where the extra 5 at the end would mean faster turbo, since P and non P models have the same boost range. so the only thing i see P meaning is that its more power hungry
2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case
P for POWAA!!!!
The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
No one but the people at AMD truly know what the "P" differentiates right now. All top level Bulldozer FX processors are unlocked.
Rig 1:
ASUS P8Z77-V
Intel i5 3570K @ 4.75GHz
16GB of Team Xtreme DDR-2666 RAM (11-13-13-35-2T)
Nvidia GTX 670 4GB SLI
Rig 2:
Asus Sabertooth 990FX
AMD FX-8350 @ 5.6GHz
16GB of Mushkin DDR-1866 RAM (8-9-8-26-1T)
AMD 6950 with 6970 bios flash
Yamakasi Catleap 2B overclocked to 120Hz refresh rate
Audio-GD FUN DAC unit w/ AD797BRZ opamps
Sennheiser PC350 headset w/ hero mod
High leakage part, maybe? Like TWKR. Could explain the TDP.
And was there some official confirmation of all FX CPUs being unlocked? O.o
Last edited by zalbard; 05-24-2011 at 09:12 AM.
Donate to XS forums
The P is most likely for Performance, Power or some other funny word :P
The situation is the same with the Llano SKU's, anything with a "P" as a suffix has 100W TDP and not 65W.
SweClockers.com
CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
GPU: HD 5770
short answer: NO
who says the Liano SKU's are with a P?? oh yeah the fake chart does, i think it's time to make a new XLS, this time lets add "C" from crap.
based on fudzilla info
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks