MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 168

Thread: Preliminary Bulldozer and Llano Pricing Revealed

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Borås, Sweden
    Posts
    89
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthShader View Post
    I did try too. While I am unsure wheter the 8110 is at 3.6 or 3.3 (the latter would fit into recent leaks), I am pretty sure 8130 is at 3.2Ghz, which is somewhat confusing. As for turbo, did you notice there are "+" signs? For 8110, I am pretty sure that's a +1.0GHz max. While for the 8130P I am seeing +1.2. A more powerful turbo would explain the TDP.

    The problem is, those "+" are being blurred differently, the "1" following the first one is also different than the others. I am therefore calling this a FAKE!
    Nice to see some more response! Frequencies are serious business! :p

    After reevaluating my propsed my numbers I've come to the conclusion that you might be right after all. What you posted here were my thoughts when I first looked at the picture. For example: when looking at the pixel coordinates of the 2s it seems likely that FX-8130P has a stock frequency of 3.2GHz. The coordinates for the 1s in the TC+1.0GHz also match other 1s. So it seems like you might be right indeed. But a turbo of up to 1.2GHz and 1.0GHz just seem very unlikely and it still does.

    And why would the FX-8130P have a lower stock frequency than FX-8110 when it has a higher potential turbo frequency? (3.2GHz vs 3.3GHz)
    And does the 200MHz turbo increase of the FX-8130P over the FX-8110 really justify an increased TDP of 30W?
    I guess the FX-8130P might have a more aggressive turbo or something in the lines of that.

    It also looks like the FX-6110 and FX-4110 have turbos of + 1.0GHz but they are harder to tell.
    Last edited by Warwian; 05-21-2011 at 12:39 PM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •