Results 1 to 25 of 168

Thread: Preliminary Bulldozer and Llano Pricing Revealed

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    It should be faster than a stock 980X, otherwise it's a flop... It's been out for over a year, and there are a bunch more Intel chips coming in Q3-Q4.
    Last edited by zalbard; 05-20-2011 at 07:36 AM.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    over the rainbow
    Posts
    964
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    It should be faster than a stock 980X, otherwise it's a flop... It's been out for over a year, and there are a bunch more Intel chips coming in Q3-Q4.
    lol. why does it have to be faster than 980x? so if VW releases a new golf 2 years after mercedes releases a SLK, the golf has to be faster than the SLK?

    one word for you: price range.
    AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W

  3. #3
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by w0mbat View Post
    lol. why does it have to be faster than 980x? so if VW releases a new golf 2 years after mercedes releases a SLK, the golf has to be faster than the SLK?
    Car analogies = instant fail.
    Quote Originally Posted by w0mbat View Post
    one word for you: price range.
    That's two words. I'll reply with two words as well: "lagging behind".
    They manage to catch up just to get stomped by IB in mid range (possibly partially SB as well, it beats 980X in quite a few cases) and SB-E in top range.
    So much for the BD hype and all those long years of waiting and development.
    Last edited by zalbard; 05-20-2011 at 08:07 AM.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    over the rainbow
    Posts
    964
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    Car analogies = instant fail.
    no. im german, born in stuttgart (the cars was invented there, its home of mercedes & porsche) and living in munich (bmw). so car analogies = the best thing ever. everyone knows cars, so its easy to understand.


    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    That's two words. I'll reply with two words as well: "lagging behind".
    They manage to catch up just to get stomped by IB in mid range (possibly partially SB as well, it beats 980X in quite a few cases) and SB-E in top range.
    So much for the BD hype and all those long years of waiting and development.
    no, BD wont lagg behind. it depends what u r doing with it. server will rock.
    AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W

  5. #5
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by w0mbat View Post
    no. im german, born in stuttgart (the cars was invented there, its home of mercedes & porsche) and living in munich (bmw). so car analogies = the best thing ever. everyone knows cars, so its easy to understand.
    the example though is not really matching. no one would expect that a car changes enough in 2 years to beat something thats worth +5x the price. cpu depreciation is like 50% a year, for cars its like 10% (until a certain point it becomes a classic and then prices go up)

    i dont disagree with car analogies, but the pricing method for both is way too different. lets imagine if the next corvette that came out somehow stripped its weight by 1000lbs and kept its 50k$ price tag, and was faster than any lamborghini, does that mean it will reduce all lambo's prices down to 40k? no, because one is a production car and one is a supercar thats made in limited quantities.

    with cpus, the size of the chip, and the process are the 2 biggest factors. 300mm2 on 32nm should be pretty close to each other (10-20% performance), just because a car costing 20k$ or 200k$ both have 3000lbs of steel does not mean they are built anywhere near the same way and can have vastly different performance (5x the horsepower)
    2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
    GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
    Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
    XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,646
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    That's two words. I'll reply with two words as well: "lagging behind".
    They manage to catch up just to get stomped by IB in mid range (possibly partially SB as well, it beats 980X in quite a few cases) and SB-E in top range.
    So much for the BD hype and all those long years of waiting and development.
    Two more words would be trash talk, stop.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    northern ireland
    Posts
    1,008
    Quote Originally Posted by w0mbat View Post

    one word for you: price range.
    Fantastic!!!!!

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •