Bulldozers first screens

[[XC] Synthetickiller]

AMD really needs to get a release date out on this socket.

The longer we have no info, the more worried I get.

I guess by the above chart, the quadcore will OC higher than the octo-core since it has a higher set stock clock speed? I know I'm just guess, but I'm curious.

I really want to see some hard numbers on these things. Every bit of info about launch and comparison to In*** has been hear say, at least from what I've seen.

[liberato87]

http://www.amdzone.com/phpbb3/viewto...8556&start=150

Looks like someone at least has one.

yes
and that could be a crosshair V ; the logos on the box are different from the crosshair IV (it seems 1 amd fx red logo and also a sli logo)

[w0mbat]

3 weeks? Hmmm...Try 3 MONTHS, that's more like it...

oh, so i should tell my colleagues to stop plannig the pr-event here in munich? seems they are way ahead of your schedule
and take back the samples they send out to the press too?

[muziqaz]

We were clearly told by John that 500Mhz is MAX for all cores active for server chips(including 16 core ones).

[chew*]

http://www.amdzone.com/phpbb3/viewto...8556&start=150

Looks like someone at least has one.

OMG it must be bulldozer and CH V.........


Actually its CH IV with the I covered and an empty box...........

[undone]

more for you guys. this one supposedly came from the channel guys, so might be more reliable.

but again the original source is PCOnline (not Chiphell), so all bets are off.
Red text below says volume shipping starts June 20-24. So July hard launch.

I went through the web found that the information above is too OLD.

http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/St...=2&frt=2&off=1

http://www.elakiri.com/forum/showpos...&postcount=142

[w0mbat]

OMG it must be bulldozer and CH V.........


Actually its CH IV with the I covered and an empty box...........

since when does the CH IV have SLI?

[FlanK3r]

End of June hardlaunch would not be unrealistic imho, early june however would be surprising.

My meaining is, we will see gradual launch, simillary, as it was with Spider platform (first chipset and boards, then CPUs). But of course, your estimation could be right (gradual launch from Computex time to the paperlaunch CPUs and sometimes later available)

And video quide for changing x6 1100t to FX 6110 or maybe some 16-core Interlagos or 50 GHZ nPhenom
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fBm7...er_profilepage

Il waiting really for launch....

[chew*]

since when does the CH IV have SLI?

Since AMD 3D records required it and lucid sux I have always had SLi on ch IV

The missing logo on box never stopped me...........I will stick a SLi sticker on my box to make you happy

[w0mbat]

i mean, on the pic u say its fake, is a sli logo on the box.

[chew*]

i mean, on the pic u say its fake, is a sli logo on the box.

I never said it was a fake, I just simply implied that stuff like that can easily be faked like much of the crud in this thread.

And anyone claiming to have parts but be under NDA is just trying to gain internet popularity points / e-peen status......or site hits.

It's very simple, before thuban launch did i claim to have every board under the sun plus thuban + a live event for AMD with live LHE benching?

No. I kept my mouth shut like i was supposed to.

[XRL8]

If you are respectfull to the NDA, the companies will treat you alike... break the rules and you might loose the support you have been building up for years... for what ? Bragging rights ? Look mum I have one... nah...

Uhm, companies dont need to know that its U that broke them.
I didnt suggest anyone should leak a score giving full adress with corresponding credentials...
But i guess nowadays if people cant have bragging rights ,they dont give a .
Anyways late June launch was pretty certain few months ago when they said production april/may and launch in summer.

[DarthShader]

I went through the web found that the information above is too OLD.

http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/St...=2&frt=2&off=1

http://www.elakiri.com/forum/showpos...&postcount=142

Good find.

Those are probably uncertainities regarding final clocks. The 500mhz boost is for all cores active, as we already know. Everything there looks reasonable, the prices too.

[Sch0cK]

At PCGH they also get an ASUS SLI MB + Bulldozer CPU ,
so seems to be real.
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/aid,82...Webseite/News/

Picture 5

[BeepBeep2]

At PCGH they also get an ASUS SLI MB + Bulldozer CPU ,
so seems to be real.
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/aid,82...Webseite/News/

Picture 5

We just had a page and a half discussion about this.

[hieuhef]

We just had a page and a half discussion about this.

Give em a break, I'm sure some people wet their pants at such news and had to share with the rest of the internets

[tifosi]

Correction... they DON't have 1 chip...

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/aid,82...18694&vollbild

There's this picture where they are being rather cheeky... Man is that pissing me off...

Then again... the picture is too small for me to zoom and read what's on the sticker... some detail is there but not legible :P

EDIT: I just hope there's some lad/ lass who's able to enhance the image and capture some info from the sticker on the box...

[stangracin3]

those don't appear to be wide enough to hold a proccessor

[tifosi]

those don't appear to be wide enough to hold a proccessor

Nopes... they're holding CPU's/ APU's... which ones... well, someone's got to have to get hold of a bigger picture, or enhance and read what it says on the stickers... They could be Llano (yay)/ BD (yay), or bugger, plain old thuban? then again, why would they send chips from a range that is to be stopped soon

[Macadamia]

those don't appear to be wide enough to hold a proccessor

Yeah... those things can only hold 938 pin CPUs. 942 pins? You're SOL.

http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/..._DSC5007sm.jpg

[w0mbat]

http://obrovsky.blogspot.com/2011/05...im-uz-vse.html

hope its not too old

[richierich]

http://obrovsky.blogspot.com/2011/05...im-uz-vse.html

hope its not too old

Google Chrome translation:

"What's in the green box? - Processors from AMD designed the NDA and a very very long time! And next month ... Nice consumption at rest, in the load it had such fame is not, but given the number of cores and capabilities, it could wait. Significantly increased memory bandwidth, the Sandy's but far from being, Bridge run is still leaps and bounds. CPU works great on my Gigabyte board, including Turbo! Support in the BIOS! The performance will not say anything .... I can not. Bye, bye ... info will gradually dropping ...

PS. If someone appears on screen CPUz where some value HTT, it's fake. As I showed you the slide before the time of that HTT is at the chip other than the Phenom II. System works differently with it, otherwise it derives its frequency. Anyway, this logo CPUz got me, he looks like a pilgrimage ...Launch date - 11.6.2011"

[Dumo]

All 40 pages

Just wait and save some dough...It will be on Newegg lists soon

In the meantime, just play with what available at retail...end of story for now

[AKM]

Google Chrome translation:

"What's in the green box? - Processors from AMD designed the NDA and a very very long time! And next month ... Nice consumption at rest, in the load it had such fame is not, but given the number of cores and capabilities, it could wait. Significantly increased memory bandwidth, the Sandy's but far from being, Bridge run is still leaps and bounds. CPU works great on my Gigabyte board, including Turbo! Support in the BIOS! The performance will not say anything .... I can not. Bye, bye ... info will gradually dropping ...

PS. If someone appears on screen CPUz where some value HTT, it's fake. As I showed you the slide before the time of that HTT is at the chip other than the Phenom II. System works differently with it, otherwise it derives its frequency. Anyway, this logo CPUz got me, he looks like a pilgrimage ...Launch date - 11.6.2011"

I see online translators completely suck at slovenian or whatever this is

What does this mean Nice consumption at rest, in the load it had such fame is not, but given the number of cores and capabilities, it could wait.

Nice consumption except at load but given nr. of cores and capabilities it could ?


And this?
Significantly increased memory bandwidth, the Sandy's but far from being, Bridge run is still leaps and bounds.

Significantly increased mem bandwith but Sandy Bridge is still better by leaps and bounds?

Maybe some native speaker can clear this up.

[El Gappo]

OMG it must be bulldozer and CH V.........


Actually its CH IV with the I covered and an empty box...........

Like OMG I has one too