Bulldozers first screens

[I.nfraR.ed]

Image analysis of the previous screenshot. I resized it once and saved as jpg at maximum quality, because the server couldn't take 1680x1050.

http://errorlevelanalysis.com/permalink/2e2bd22/

Error level analysis is a quick and easy image forensics method, allowing one to determine if an image has been modified by programs such as Adobe Photoshop.

It works by resaving an image at a known quality, and comparing that to the original image. As a jpeg image is resaved over and over again, its image quality decreases. When we resave an image and compare it to the original, we can guess just how many times the image has been resaved. If an image has not been manipulated, all parts of the image should have been saved an equal amount of times. If parts of the image are from different source files, they may have been saved a number of different times, and thus they will stand out as a different colour in the ELA test.

Not sure how relevant is this.

[El Gappo]

Image analysis of the previous screenshot. I resized it once and saved as jpg at maximum quality, because the server couldn't take 1680x1050.

http://errorlevelanalysis.com/permalink/2e2bd22/



Not sure how relevant is this.

Pretty clear the windows cpu description was edited, doesn't even show up on the analysis. (besides being a different font and blindingly obvious anyways.)

[mak1skav]

I can't comment on P67 (which is a new and different beast) but, comparing the SATA performance of SB850 to ICH10, they're pretty level. Intel usually wins out on the randoms and AMD wins out on the sequentials. I believe ICH10 is limited on the top end to 600MB/sec on RAID, and I've seen over 1100 on SB850 with 4R0 SSDs. That 1100 seems to be a SB850 limitation, since I see over 1250 easily on an add-in card with the same drives.

--Matt

Thanks for these informations mate.

[BeepBeep2]

What typically makes ICH10R look better than SB850 are burst rates...ICH10 has (random) burst rates like no tomorrow, you might have bursts of 1200+ on just a few HDD's or two SSD's...however SB850 is better sequential.

[ridney]

saw these links at semiaccurate forums, interesting. it seems real

http://www.youtube.com/user/LucasMat.../0/6zK4WAPKNYo

http://www.youtube.com/user/LucasMat.../2/yUWckPBv6Fs

http://www.youtube.com/user/LucasMat.../1/LQWhnGbteIY

[mongoled]

Where did the last post go to???

Did anybody get a chance to follow the link?



Latest Youtube links

[imamage]

saw these links at semiaccurate forums, interesting. it seems real

http://www.youtube.com/user/LucasMat.../0/6zK4WAPKNYo

http://www.youtube.com/user/LucasMat.../2/yUWckPBv6Fs

http://www.youtube.com/user/LucasMat.../1/LQWhnGbteIY

Dang , It's hella fast !!!
Now I can't wait to get one

[Daveburt714]

Man I can't wait to get my hands on one of these!

Whether it beats SB or not, it looks like ALOT of fun to play with...

I'm just guessing here, but I bet these things are going to be OC monsters!

Not that I've done cold, but hopefully they won't be bugged at sub 0.

[JPQY]

Guys..if you get one of these in your new system..then i hope to see soon some Chess results from you!

I think the Bulldozer will doing it great with Chess ,and the Chess-world will be happy to have a new super chess moves calculator.

Hope to see a nice compare with the 4 ,6 & 8cores version ,and where they will take place in my list!

JP.

[badboy18187]

I can't begin imagine how many "leaks" will appear in the coming month prior to BD's launch. I just hope this won't be like in Cayman's case where in the end so many were let down by its performance.(kudos to NV for the 580 being a surprise)

[Olivon]

saw these links at semiaccurate forums, interesting. it seems real

http://www.youtube.com/user/LucasMat.../0/6zK4WAPKNYo

http://www.youtube.com/user/LucasMat.../2/yUWckPBv6Fs

http://www.youtube.com/user/LucasMat.../1/LQWhnGbteIY

All is true ! Zero photopshop's work and I can make a video too !

[AKM]

All is true ! Zero photopshop's work and I can make a video too !

Well I guess that settles it then, if this and WEI scores are so easy to hack.

[kaktus1907]

he is doing wei simultaneously in one of the videos i dont call it's a fake so easy dont know though in sa forums ppl searching his family tree nearly

[AKM]

he is doing wei simultaneously in one of the videos i dont call it's a fake so easy dont know though in sa forums ppl searching his family tree nearly

Apparently using this software you can hack the wei score and still remain unchanged after redoing the test. This plus his refusal to show cpuz readings plus what Olivon demonstrated plus no temperature readings for individual cores just like Phenom II and I think it's enough to show it's fake.

[Mats]

I just hope this won't be like in Cayman's case where in the end so many were let down by its performance.

That's because people weren't being realistic, even AMD said it wouldn't break any records, but nobody listened because it wasn't any fun to hear.
It's more fun to live up there among the little fluffy clouds..

[ridney]

All is true ! Zero photopshop's work and I can make a video too !

show everyone how to fake this and give us a video

[FlanK3r]

I hate this fakers ....no, no, until the launch I want not see benchmarks

[Olivon]

show everyone how to fake this and give us a video

I got other things more interesting to do ...

Use Google and you'll find

[Mats]

AMD never said that, all they ever really said about performance was "Better performance per watt" and that was compared to K10, plus that was comparing server parts (read JF's blog), they hardly even mentioned the desktop parts in their CCs or anaylst day events.

We're obviously not talking about the same thing.
Did you read my post? It was about CAYMAN.

[ReKcOlNu]

We're obviously not talking about the same thing.
Did you read my post? It was about CAYMAN.

Sorry, I got mixed up! (post deleted!)

DOESN'T ANYONE STAY ON TOPIC ANYMORE?

[informal]

Until we get a real leak from a credible person/website,all of this is just BS. But credible sources won't break the NDA,so there won't be real leaks until the launch date...Which is under NDA too

[charged3800z24]

Man I can't wait to get my hands on one of these!

Whether it beats SB or not, it looks like ALOT of fun to play with...

I'm just guessing here, but I bet these things are going to be OC monsters!

Not that I've done cold, but hopefully they won't be bugged at sub 0.

I'm with ya Dave, Can't wait. Feels like it is taking forever for the chip to launch though... time is going so slow. I would like to do some benching on more then chilled water though.....

[XRL8]

In this article about BD, the cpuz version is not the most recent one available, so people can use newer ones and it doesnt define them as fake.
However, i think any true leaker with half a brain would give us cinebench or wprime score, or something like that.

[RussC]

Well its faster in that CPU test than my 955-C2 OC'd to 3.75GHz. But the scores max @ 7.9, mine ran 7.4 so it really dosent tell us anything.

Um, when we say fake the test, does that mean its not a BD in the system? That part can be changed?

RussC

[crazydiamond]

so soon but so far away!