Asus Crosshair IV Extreme
AMD FX-8350
AMD ref. HD 6950 2Gb x 2
4x4Gb HyperX T1
Corsair AX1200
3 x Alphacool triple, 2 x Alphacool ATXP 6970/50, EK D5 dual top, EK Supreme HF
Even if it's fake, the very quick Super Pi time brought up a discussion at OCF:
Since each module has shared components, and the hardware does the splitting of resources, even if Super Pi is a single-threaded program, it will be split up between the two "cores" in the single module because the resource allocating is done via on-chip hardware, and not the software.Which is like getting two cores to computer Super Pi, but it's still single-threaded.
Everyone is wrong sometimes
I used Photoshop CS3 with a compression of 6, and while it's not as extreme, his might be an older or newer version. OR not even Photoshop for that matter.
I assume it abruptly stops like that because the aliasing of text results in small color changes, which can compress. Big empty white boxes are solid and so any compression doesn't stand out.[/theory]
Your "compression boxes" are not perfectly uniform like they are in the other shot... also look at your box that says DDR3...
Smile
That's why I made the disclaimer about what version PShop I used, and the fact the other pic may not ever have been saved in any version of PShop :\ Compare AIDA and Notepad though, you'll see the plain as day boxes around the text.
Also a huge difference is the Windows DPI is cranked up on his, which will impact the severity of the compression artifacting. I was going to change mine, but already changed themes for this endeavor haha
Again, I know mine isn't a perfect match, but it shows that it will at least artifact that way
One other thing, there are two fonts in CPU-Z:
The HT in HT Link on CPU-Z is in the same blue as the field values, a mistake or very odd compression?
Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!
Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v
Wrong. One execution-unit can in singelthreaded mode use all resources of the front-end and deliver massive throughput. Also with aggressive Turbo mode, it will be even faster in singelthreaded workload.
No one has pointed out that Bulldozer can execute one thread along the two integer units.
If it does so anyways, then I'm very glad.
As I said, AMD is REALLY holding Bulldozer behind the gates.
Ivy Bridge 3770K @ ????MHz
6c Intel Xeon X7460 24MB cache 16GB RAM 22TB HDD fileserver
Dual Intel Xeon E5620 workstation
SB 2600K @ 5016MHz 1.37v HT on AIR primestable
AMD Athlon X3 425 @ B25 4GHz+ AIR
AMD Athlon X2 6400+ @ 3811MHz AIR
AMD Athlon X2 3600+ @ 3200MHz AIR
AMD Athlon XP 1700+ @ 2714MHz AIR
Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme
Corsair 8GB XMS3 2000MHz
ATI Radeon HD5850 @ 1000MHz+/1200MHz+
Windows 7 Enterprise x64
Corsair HX750W
Each integer unit has its own scheduler. They can't combine the two integer units to process one instruction or one thread.
The two 128-bit FPU's belong to each of the two cores in the module, but share a single scheduler.
Only certain 256-bit FP instructions can be spanned across the two 128-bit FPU's - I'd guess the OS will see it as being just one of the two cores in the module being used, even though the other core's FPU is busy, which would still allow integer instructions to run on that core.
Or would it be possible for it to simultaneously process (1x256-bit OR 2x128-bit) FP instructions as well as integer instructions on both cores?
http://www.rumorpedia.net/wp-content...dbulldozer.jpg
here you go higher resolution. LOL but two active windows???![]()
That's the Windows System page where you took the screen crop of (Control Panel\All Control Panel Items\System). The font is the same though, just looks a little different due to all the dissimilar characters. Compare the "m" though, in "memory" and "(tm)", you can see they are of the same size and font.
The HT color IS blue like the specs, as you pointed out. The font size is also down a point or two from non-GB version, but I suspect that was done to allow all of the lines in the Instructions to be displayed. The color I can only assume would be due to a coding goof by the programmer, but it is odd none-the-less.
Aside form that, the only other oddity I've spotted (on account of your post when I went to compare fonts) is the control panel path in the basic system info screen. Not much is able to be seen due to the IM message window, but what we CAN see is: The trailing point on a "▶", and "System and Se". Either it's "System and Settings" or "System and Search", neither of which are what my Win7 Ultimate show (at least the 32bit ver I've got on this laptop).
That's the exact same picture, Skull lol Res, file size, even link (and filename as a result)
What do you mean by "two active windows" though? CPU-Z, or?
Aye, good catch. That reminds me of the one I forgot to mention: I think there might be a setting deeper in Windows to disable the Aero Peek on the task bar windows (disabling it is just for the button on the far right side), but... If I hover over the thumbnail like he has, which is the only way to get the yellow balloon to pop up, it makes all the windows transparent (see pic attachment).
Also, there is another snafu, which falls in line with the dual-illuminated Red X issue (which hovering the cursor over an inactive window's X will make it red, but it also glows and looks different). The window shadowing actually indicates that THREE windows are 'active'! The MSN chat, CPU-Z, and then Notepad as well (but it's X is offscreen).
I'm beginning to think there is no such thing as the perfect fake on things such as this (where so much is unknown) when you have enough eyes
EDIT: aha-ha DUHH Helps to at least TAKE the screenshot I was going to attach >_< *sigh* I resized it 50%, since no use in using a full-res shot. Here it is though...
Last edited by Formula350; 05-11-2011 at 12:18 PM. Reason: Cuz I'm a 'tard...
Nicely spotted![]()
Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!
Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v
With regards to Formula350's image, I think it's worth pointing out that if you just hover the icon on your taskbar and not over the larger "thumbnail" that pops up, you won't activate the Aero Peek feature and will only see the thumbnail plus the little tooltip with the title of the window. With that being said, I've noticed something further that would be evidence against it being legitimate.
In the chat window, you'll notice that in the context menu in the chat window, "Video from Bing" is highlighted which means the mouse pointer would have to be hovering over it when the screenshot was taken. At the same time though, the "thumbnail" for the CPU-Z readme text file is active which means that the mouse pointer must be hovering over the taskbar. The mouse pointer must be in two places at once which can't be possible....
Last edited by ASharp; 05-11-2011 at 01:01 PM.
simply put, that chat window was added to the image
2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
currently has .2748428927348 internetscreate your own rules to find the answer
Oh nice one.
Besides, two recycler bins?Lower left and upper right. Not saying it's impossible, just stupid.
And why would anyone set the title bars to be that gigantic? I always make them smaller after install (the smaller one in the pic). The same goes for the border padding.
Guys it was already reported that screen is several screens merged...no need to speculate on why there are two active windows...doesn't mean its fake I could do that too![]()
Smile
Bookmarks