Quote Originally Posted by Ao1 View Post
About time we started to see the iodrive in action. It would be nice to see some more.
What would you like to see?

The most interesting part (to me) I already saw... Looking at average response times, iodrive took 0.045ms*60k = 2.7 seconds to serve the required data (reads), while X25-E array took 4.4 seconds. The savings of 1.7s in load times between the two game loads are very close to what actually happens when I compare with a stopwatch.

So theoretically, if my storage system was infinitely fast, I would shave another 2.7s off my load times. The rest is bottlenecked by other components (CPU mostly).

I would be interested to confirm exactly where the iodrive gains so much over the x25-e array... It is obviously the low QD small file performance, but it would be nice to confirm.