Quote Originally Posted by cegras View Post
'Mate', if you were familiar with statistics you would know something about weighting.
Again, he is entitled to that. No problem there. As I said before, my only issue is with the discrepancy between test scores and final score of both cards. Nothing else.


Quote Originally Posted by STEvil View Post
So then why are you ripping on IPS? Do you just not understand there is more at play than just pixel response times, or is that why you bother to take into consideration numbers below 1920x1080 which are pretty much pointless for anyone who's gonna blow that much cash on something like this?
1- Cause IPS are not considered the best monitors for gaming...?

2- I'm not taking anything into consideration. He is, by testing the cards at those resolutions. If he is not taking scores below 1920x1200 into account why test them at those resolutions? What's the point?


Quote Originally Posted by insurgent View Post
I'd let him hold on to that 4% which may very well be within the margin of error, without even considering anything below 1080p is pointless. You can't really take anyone using that argument seriously
Have you seen the advantage of the 6990 @ 2560 on the tPU! review? The huge lead at high res that made it get a 9.1 score, do you know the value? 3%...


Quote Originally Posted by insurgent View Post
If you want to ask him about something, ask him about the EPIC FAIL anagram and why he forgot/decided not to overvolt the 6990 on his review.