Ok I don't want to drag this out further, but I think this needs addressing. Firstly we acknowledge your point about the fact that ultimate stability is essentially unable to be proven as you would have to run the application/suite of applications indefinitely and even then you would say after 5 years be 'only' 5 years (insert application name here) stable.
Secondly, there seems to be a bit of language interpretation getting in the way here. You made the comment that an individual could say their machine is 'able to run 20 passes of LinX without error' and you then said an individual could not say their machine is '20 pass LinX stable'. I can tell you, and I am most certainly not being patronizing in any way here, that those 2 statements in english mean the same thing. '20 pass' is the qualifier to the statement 'LinX stable'. 'LinX stable' as a claim is only an absolute if it is not qualified by the number of passes, and when it is, it means it is only x passes LinX stable. All of us are only making the qualified and limited statement that our machines can run LinX at >/= 4.5GHz for 20 or more passes without error. We are most certainly not claiming absolute stability nor trying to achieve it.
Zalbard chose 20 passes at max mem settings because its hard to do, but not incredibly hard, and it takes a short enough amount of time for people to want to have a go. It's the perfect idea and requirements for a club so us guys can just have a bit of fun with the thousands of dollars worth of gear we all own and admire each others achievements.
I hope this clears things up for you.
That is awesome![]()
Bookmarks