Page 38 of 42 FirstFirst ... 2835363738394041 ... LastLast
Results 926 to 950 of 1028

Thread: NVIDIA GTX 595 (picture+Details)

  1. #926
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    328
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnZS View Post
    I am not an expert on 3dmark 11 as I do not have it... however those scores do not look too bad?!?
    John
    HD6990 with i7 970 stock:

  2. #927
    XIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,524
    Quote Originally Posted by techjesse View Post
    Hey Guys, the New GTX 590 is for sale at TD for $729.99 http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...p?EdpNo=128723
    Sold out in 2 hours

  3. #928
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    660
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnZS View Post
    I am not an expert on 3dmark 11 as I do not have it... however those scores do not look too bad?!?
    John
    Well,the lowest HD 6990 score registered at 3dmark is 9691
    An unfortunate person is one tries to fart but sh1ts instead...

    My Water Cooling Case Build (closed)

  4. #929
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    IND
    Posts
    1,038
    Quote Originally Posted by SpuTnicK View Post
    3D Mark 11 Scores
    beaten by 6990 def or gtx 570 def SLI

  5. #930
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    272
    Man... i was doing 7200 marks with my clocked 580 :P Mehhhhhh
    Oh...your ass is grass and I've got the weed-whacker.

  6. #931
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,597
    Quote Originally Posted by Gilgamesh View Post
    HD6990 with i7 970 stock:
    The results for the 590 posted above were taken with a Core i5?
    Would be nice to see results taken on the same system... oh well roll on later today I guess when the official reviews are released

    John
    Stop looking at the walls, look out the window

  7. #932
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    441
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnZS View Post
    The results for the 590 posted above were taken with a Core i5?
    Would be nice to see results taken on the same system... oh well roll on later today I guess when the official reviews are released

    John
    Yeah, LOL running the 590 with an I5.

  8. #933
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    272
    Oh...your ass is grass and I've got the weed-whacker.

  9. #934
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    533
    Quote Originally Posted by MaddMuppet View Post
    Yeah, LOL running the 590 with an I5.
    What's funny about using GTX 590 with Core i5-2500K?

  10. #935
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Valencia, España
    Posts
    146
    prove a dual vga with a core i5 is a sin

  11. #936
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    441
    Quote Originally Posted by Vardant View Post
    What's funny about using GTX 590 with Core i5-2500K?
    Well the 2500k doesn't have hyperthreading for one.

  12. #937
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,592
    Quote Originally Posted by Postmodum View Post
    Wow, couldn't they have done the review in any lower resolution?
    The XS Folding@Home team needs your help! Join us and help fight diseases with your CPU and GPU!!


  13. #938
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    272
    well, the true question is ... how it will scale with some voltage tweaks ... that's what i'm really expecting to know these gf110 like to run "wild" and i saw with the 580 that if i had a little more voltage and pushed the core freq they would give a huge leap forward in performance...
    Oh...your ass is grass and I've got the weed-whacker.

  14. #939
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    441
    Quote Originally Posted by Postmodum View Post
    well, the true question is ... how it will scale with some voltage tweaks ... that's what i'm really expecting to know these gf110 like to run "wild" and i saw with the 580 that if i had a little more voltage and pushed the core freq they would give a huge leap forward in performance...
    Yes, i'm very interested to see how these overclock. If they clock well and the way that Fermi chips scale. This could be one beast of a card.

  15. #940
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    272
    But i must admit, the final comments and the thumbs of up, looked like a paid "puppet" ... ehehehhe

    Also, i think the system he's using for review, should be a little softer than 12Gb of Ram, 980x and a G1 mobo ... eheheh ...
    Oh...your ass is grass and I've got the weed-whacker.

  16. #941
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    38
    Eyefinity/surround 5760x1200/1080 - SLI, crossfire - OC. Reviews thanks.
    Obsidian 800D - i7 2600k@H70 - HIS HD6990 - Sapphire HD6970 CF - Aquacomputer XT Ultra - 2xCrucial C300 64GB Raid 0 - Gigabyte P67A-UD7 - Corsair Vengeance 8GB 8C - Coolermaster Silent PRO Gold 1200W - 3x24" Eyefinity 5760x1200


  17. #942
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Past
    Posts
    447
    Well theres a reason AMD uses and NV used up to now those smaller weirder fans.If i remember correctly they work better than standard ones if you have another card right beneath first one.
    Im glad tho that they finally resigned on this idea, if someone is going to use two such cards, theyre gonna put them under water.
    As to why its quieter also, im betting some heavy duty undervolting is going on.And i personally think thats a GOOD idea.On stock you get powerfull yet quietish card.If you want maximum performance, then crank up RPM`s and voltage.Maybe some heavy binning also, because AMD on HD6990 didnt really bin chips different than 69xx.
    Ati and Nv should realize what kind of people are folks who buy them.They all should come with software giving you full control on everything and ability to set power/volt/clock/fan speed/temperature profiles.Standard limiting doesnt work and is worthless.As they started to discover in this generation.

  18. #943
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    192.168.1.1
    Posts
    221
    Wow... so the performance is pretty much the same as 6990, as well as the price... now, how about power draw / temperatures / noise?

  19. #944
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by p2501 View Post
    Wow, couldn't they have done the review in any lower resolution?
    Thought the same.

    Results from that review (notice the minimum FPS at Heaven benchmark. Typo?)










  20. #945
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    192.168.1.1
    Posts
    221
    It's not the resolution, it's the compression. I could hardly see anything

  21. #946
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by hurrdurr View Post
    It's not the resolution, it's the compression. I could hardly see anything
    Blame youtube

  22. #947
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    588
    since the Graphic Card is going to be released today, I want to thank everyone that particpate with reports, photos and information.

    I'm sure I'm going to find prospect threads to meet with your interesting opinions.

  23. #948
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Valencia, España
    Posts
    146

  24. #949
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    213
    googletranslate...

    The frequency standard 607, 1214, 3412 MHz, respectively, per core, shader and memory, and a voltage of 0.937 volts, we were able to pass without overvolt, 770, 1540, 3920 MHz by increasing the voltage to 1.23 volts, most, we got to 979, 1958, 4118 MHz A monstrous leap forward, a sign of great overcloccabilità core of GF110, and Nvidia's decision to keep rates low to reduce noise, fuel consumption and temperature.
    -Intel 3770K,
    -Gigabyte Z77 UD5H,
    -Gigabyte GTX 680 SLI,
    -16gb Corsair Vengeance,
    -SSD 128gb Kingston, 2×1TB Samsung F3,
    -Corsair 1000W
    -Z-5500@XONAR HDAV 1.3 DELUXE

  25. #950
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    217
    Quote Originally Posted by Handrox View Post
    Thanks for posting. I was in the middle of reading it when the review was pulled from the site (hopefully just for a few more minutes until NDA is up)!
    Dimastech Easy Dual v2.5 (black)-----Silverstone Strider 1500w-----ASUS Maximus IV Extreme-----Intel 2600K-----Corsair Dominator GT (4x4GB) DDR3 2000-----2x Samsung 840 Pro 256GB SSD's-----2x GTX Titan 6GB SLI-----Dell 3008WFP

    Watercooling Loop: EK Supreme HF Rev. 2 - Acetal-----2x EK-Titan Acetal connected via EK-FC Terminal Dual Parallel-----2x Swiftech MCR320 Drive Radiators w/ built-in MCP35X Pumps-----EK-MultiOption RES X2 - 250 Advanced-----6x Scythe GT 1850rpm Fans-----Primochill LRT 3/8" ID - 5/8" OD (Red)-----Bitspower Carbon Black Fittings-----Distilled Water + PT_Nuke PHN + Feser Base Corrosion Blocker

Page 38 of 42 FirstFirst ... 2835363738394041 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •