Page 6 of 19 FirstFirst ... 345678916 ... LastLast
Results 126 to 150 of 466

Thread: HD 6990 Preview/Review

  1. #126
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    4,467
    Well if it is truly $700 then I guess I will pass. Dual GPU's had historically been less than two separate equal GPU's unless they were a special card like Asus' Ares card. I will also wait for some more reviews since I am surprised it would beat two HD6970's in CF when clocked the same since they are supposed to be sharing the same GPU.
    CPUID http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=554982
    New DO Stepping http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=555012
    4.8Ghz - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=794165

    Desk Build
    FX8120 @ 4.6Ghz 24/7 / Asus Crosshair V /HD7970/ 8Gb (4x2Gb) Gskill 2133Mhz / Intel 320 160Gb OS Drive, WD 256GB Game Storage

    W/C System
    (CPU) Swiftech HD (GPU) EK HD7970 with backplate (RAM) MIPS Ram block (Rad/Pump) 3 x Thermochill 120.3 triple rads and Dual MCP355's with Heatkiller dual top and Cyberdruid Prism res / B*P/Koolance Compression Fittings and Quick Disconnects.

  2. #127
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    Quote Originally Posted by MrToad View Post
    I honestly did think that a single 6990 was going to beat 2 x 5970s. After all the 6990 is a dual-GPU card, and of a newer generation.

    In fact I was already wondering if someone was going to make a waterblock for it and I had set money aside to buy both.

    Which is why I'm so perplexed.

    Sadly " this generation " is not what we was waiting... it's not like pass from a 4870 to 5970 or even to a 5870 ... AMD have need redesign is 32nm new architecutre in 40nm and so " perf / specs etc " was way less .. it's just 2x 6970 packed .. only and just that. it will not change the spec and perf of the 6970's

    Quote Originally Posted by Utnorris View Post
    Well if it is truly $700 then I guess I will pass. Dual GPU's had historically been less than two separate equal GPU's unless they were a special card like Asus' Ares card. I will also wait for some more reviews since I am surprised it would beat two HD6970's in CF when clocked the same since they are supposed to be sharing the same GPU.
    It was allready happend in some really rare case with 5970 vs 5870 ( rare, i remember 1-2games )... even if i have allways ask me if it was not the reviewers who have mess something doing the bench.
    Last edited by Lanek; 03-07-2011 at 08:20 AM.
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  3. #128
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    511
    Quote Originally Posted by MrToad View Post
    I honestly did think that a single 6990 was going to beat 2 x 5970s. After all the 6990 is a dual-GPU card, and of a newer generation.

    In fact I was already wondering if someone was going to make a waterblock for it and I had set money aside to buy both.

    Which is why I'm so perplexed.
    but like said you have a total of 4 gpus with 3200sp..so 6400sp vs 30xxsp
    even if its a newer tweaked version its not that great..that would have to make the 6970 2x a 5870 ...which isn't what it is..

  4. #129
    Xtreme Batrachian
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Eastbourne, UK
    Posts
    1,368
    Quote Originally Posted by InCredible View Post
    but like said you have a total of 4 gpus with 3200sp..so 6400sp vs 30xxsp
    even if its a newer tweaked version its not that great..that would have to make the 6970 2x a 5870 ...which isn't what it is..
    Yeah, I see what you mean now... I got confused with the product code

    5970 = 2 cores, 6970 = 1 core.

    Compare 5870 to 6970 = good.

    Compare 5970 to 6970 = no good.

    Compare 5970 to 6990 = good.
    Last edited by MrToad; 03-07-2011 at 08:43 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by fart_plume View Post
    First loops are like first sex, all hands and thumbs till you figure out what goes where, then it's what ever works best for you.

  5. #130
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    is there any game where you would need more than a 6990 with just a 1080p monitor?
    2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
    GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
    Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
    XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case

  6. #131
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    511
    @ manicdan. not really..Metro at 1920x1200 averages 60fps..its just you might hit some lag here n there..since of course thats average fps and not min. which is where you'll see the lag..but all games should run flawlessly on this single card at the res and max settings.

  7. #132
    Xtreme Batrachian
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Eastbourne, UK
    Posts
    1,368
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    is there any game where you would need more than a 6990 with just a 1080p monitor?
    In my case, no. The only reason why I have two 5970s is because I only paid for the waterblocks, the cards were free

    When it comes to the 6990 one does me fine. If I can flog the 2 x 5970s for a good price I might get one, now that InCredible has patiently dissipated the fog that was clogging my mind.
    Quote Originally Posted by fart_plume View Post
    First loops are like first sex, all hands and thumbs till you figure out what goes where, then it's what ever works best for you.

  8. #133
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    409
    If it's more expensive than 2x6970 I dont see much reason for buying it. In any case you'll still need water cooling if you don't want the blow dryer sound effect applied to all your games.
    "No, you'll warrant no villain's exposition from me."

  9. #134
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    399
    Quote Originally Posted by MrToad View Post
    In my case, no. The only reason why I have two 5970s is because I only paid for the waterblocks, the cards were free
    oooh, I want to buy some waterblocks too, sign me up, sign me up!!

    You are going to be CPU limited for most stuff at such low resolution anyways. I'd invest in some monitors.

  10. #135
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Toronto ON
    Posts
    566
    Quote Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal View Post
    Looking good, probably will buy one. Waiting for more reviews and price.
    Core i7-4930K LGA 2011 Six-Core - Cooler Master Seidon 120XL ? Push-Pull Liquid Water
    ASUS Rampage IV Black Edition LGA2011 - G.SKILL Trident X Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR3 1866
    Sapphire R9 290X 4GB TRI-X OC in CrossFire - ATI TV Wonder 650 PCIe
    Intel X25-M 160GB G2 SSD - WD Black 2TB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache SATA 6
    Corsair HX1000W PSU - Pioner Blu-ray Burner 6X BD-R
    Westinghouse LVM-37w3, 37inch 1080p - Windows 7 64-bit Pro
    Sennheiser RS 180 - Cooler Master Cosmos S Case

  11. #136
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Toronto ON
    Posts
    566
    Quote Originally Posted by Pantsu View Post
    If it's more expensive than 2x6970 I dont see much reason for buying it. In any case you'll still need water cooling if you don't want the blow dryer sound effect applied to all your games.
    It's going to be cheaper than two HD 6970 and if it needs water-cooling I will not buy the card. It should run cooler than HD 6970 CF or GTX 580 SLI, specially if the cards are installed side side like in my case.

    Here is the full load temperature benchmark running FurMark comparing to other cards, mostly single GPU.

    Core i7-4930K LGA 2011 Six-Core - Cooler Master Seidon 120XL ? Push-Pull Liquid Water
    ASUS Rampage IV Black Edition LGA2011 - G.SKILL Trident X Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR3 1866
    Sapphire R9 290X 4GB TRI-X OC in CrossFire - ATI TV Wonder 650 PCIe
    Intel X25-M 160GB G2 SSD - WD Black 2TB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache SATA 6
    Corsair HX1000W PSU - Pioner Blu-ray Burner 6X BD-R
    Westinghouse LVM-37w3, 37inch 1080p - Windows 7 64-bit Pro
    Sennheiser RS 180 - Cooler Master Cosmos S Case

  12. #137
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    ROMANIA
    Posts
    687
    For GTX 580 the temperature is a fake, the real temperature is 79-82C(reference cooler) dependig on ambient, case air flow.
    If it's more expensive than 2x6970 I dont see much reason for buying it. In any case you'll still need water cooling if you don't want the blow dryer sound effect applied to all your games.
    +1.
    For a 700-800$ card 6990 has as always a poor cooler from Amd.
    Remember 4870X2 vs GTX 295.
    Last edited by xdan; 03-07-2011 at 01:59 PM.
    i5 2500K@ 4.5Ghz
    Asrock P67 PRO3


    P55 PRO & i5 750
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966385
    239 BCKL validation on cold air
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=966536
    Almost 5hgz , air.

  13. #138
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,597
    It's close to release...

    John
    Stop looking at the walls, look out the window

  14. #139
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    I remember seeing a lot of those 90c+ numbers for a lot of cards, like my GTX480. Stays under 82c most of the time for me though, so i'll wait to see some "better" numbers.

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  15. #140
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Nordschleife!
    Posts
    705
    Seems great. Almost the same performance as 2x6970. Can't wait for reviews from more reputable sites tomorrow...

    Any review lacking an Eyefinity setup will be useless, imo. I'll probably go to a 5760x1080 or 3240x1920 setup later this month and this card is overkill for 90% of the games available even at 2560x1600.
    Murray Walker: "And there are flames coming from the back of Prost's McLaren as he enters the Swimming Pool."

    James Hunt: "Well, that should put them out then."

  16. #141
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,012
    not bad. It performs like a 6970 CFX, draws power like 6970 CFX, produces heat like 6970 CFX. the only thing is that I bet it is a good bunch louder then a 6970 CFX i honestly am not sure what people were expecting. this is great to see this out of a single card but unless it is priced at $550 for MOST people a pair of 6950 2GB's would be a better and cheaper option.

    but then again you always get 2 of these for some serious ePeen action
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
    Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
    GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
    Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
    Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
    Case: Modded 700D
    PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
    Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
    Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's

  17. #142
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by STEvil View Post
    I remember seeing a lot of those 90c+ numbers for a lot of cards, like my GTX480. Stays under 82c most of the time for me though, so i'll wait to see some "better" numbers.
    i like seeing temp and power consumption in gaming. furmark is nice and reliable and all that, but there are reasons why more roadblocks are being built to prevent such tests from working.

    i also think the should post fps in furmark, aswell as temps and load to show efficiency.
    2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
    GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
    Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
    XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case

  18. #143
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    i like seeing temp and power consumption in gaming. furmark is nice and reliable and all that, but there are reasons why more roadblocks are being built to prevent such tests from working.

    i also think the should post fps in furmark, aswell as temps and load to show efficiency.
    Agree. I dislike that we are not being allowed to use the GPU to its full potential, but I do realize there are limits to what can be done :/

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  19. #144
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,597
    The card retails for nearly $900 and none of you batted an eyelid?!?
    John
    Stop looking at the walls, look out the window

  20. #145
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,012
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnZS View Post
    The card retails for nearly $900 and none of you batted an eyelid?!?
    John
    maybe off shore but in the US AMD would need to be utterly stupid to do that. I'm guessing it slides right into the 5970 spot. maybe around $700 at launch and then dropping to to some-ware in the $600's
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
    Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
    GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
    Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
    Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
    Case: Modded 700D
    PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
    Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
    Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's

  21. #146
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Nordschleife!
    Posts
    705
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] hipno650 View Post
    (...) I honestly am not sure what people were expecting. this is great to see this out of a single card but unless it is priced at $550 for MOST people a pair of 6950 2GB's would be a better and cheaper option.
    I was expecting a significant gap between 2x6970 vs. 6990 considering mem clock difference. But as I said im my previous post I'm interest in Eyefinity only. The mem. clock gap might be an issue at ultra-high res.
    Murray Walker: "And there are flames coming from the back of Prost's McLaren as he enters the Swimming Pool."

    James Hunt: "Well, that should put them out then."

  22. #147
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,597
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] hipno650 View Post
    maybe off shore but in the US AMD would need to be utterly stupid to do that. I'm guessing it slides right into the 5970 spot. maybe around $700 at launch and then dropping to to some-ware in the $600's
    You are right
    US price is $730!

    John
    Stop looking at the walls, look out the window

  23. #148
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    3,656
    Quote Originally Posted by Utnorris View Post
    Well if it is truly $700 then I guess I will pass. Dual GPU's had historically been less than two separate equal GPU's unless they were a special card like Asus' Ares card. I will also wait for some more reviews since I am surprised it would beat two HD6970's in CF when clocked the same since they are supposed to be sharing the same GPU.
    I totally agree with u. I've tried these dual card/singe slot solutions and i can say that if you want CF/SLI do it the right way...
    Project ZEUS II

    Asus Rampage II Extreme
    Intel I7 920 D0 3930A @ 4.50GHz (21 X 214mhz)
    3 x 2GB G.Skill Trident 1600 @ 1716MHz (6-8-6-20-1N)
    2 x Asus HD 6870 CrossFire @ 1000/1100MHz
    OCZ Vertex 2 60GB | Intel X25-M 120GB | WD Velociraptor 150GB | Seagate FreeAgent XTreme 1.5TB esata
    Asus Xonar DX | Logitech Z-5500 | LG W2600HP 26" S-IPS LCD

    Watercooling setup:
    1st loop -> Radiator: 2 x ThermoChill PA120.3 | Pump: Laing DDC-3.25 with Alphacool HF 38 top | CPU: Swiftech Apogee XT | Chipset: Swiftech MCW-NBMAX | Tubing: Masterkleer 1/2" UV
    2nd loop -> Radiator: ThermoChill PA120.3 | Pump: Laing DDC-3.2 with Alphacool HF 38 top | GPU: 2 x EK FC-6870 | Tubing: Masterkleer 1/2" UV


    Assembled in Mountain Mods Ascension Trinity
    Powered by Corsair Professional Series Gold AX1200

  24. #149
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    4,467
    Maybe in a few months. If it does not have a MSRP of $600 they won't sell many when you can get two HD6970's for around $640 or two HD6950's for around $550 or less. The only thing this time around is that Nvidia will release a competing card and hopefully will keep the HD6990's price down unlike the HD5970 which actually sold for way more than MSRP due to lack of availability and competition.
    CPUID http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=554982
    New DO Stepping http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=555012
    4.8Ghz - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=794165

    Desk Build
    FX8120 @ 4.6Ghz 24/7 / Asus Crosshair V /HD7970/ 8Gb (4x2Gb) Gskill 2133Mhz / Intel 320 160Gb OS Drive, WD 256GB Game Storage

    W/C System
    (CPU) Swiftech HD (GPU) EK HD7970 with backplate (RAM) MIPS Ram block (Rad/Pump) 3 x Thermochill 120.3 triple rads and Dual MCP355's with Heatkiller dual top and Cyberdruid Prism res / B*P/Koolance Compression Fittings and Quick Disconnects.

  25. #150
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by Caparroz View Post
    I was expecting a significant gap between 2x6970 vs. 6990 considering mem clock difference. But as I said im my previous post I'm interest in Eyefinity only. The mem. clock gap might be an issue at ultra-high res.
    looking at the one review, the perf difference at 1920x1200 is like 1-2%, but at 2560x1600 was like 2-5%, so i can only imagine it gets worse as you go higher
    2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
    GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
    Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
    XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case

Page 6 of 19 FirstFirst ... 345678916 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •