Quote Originally Posted by chew* View Post
Well you certainly proved the fact that 890 should be used with thuban,High clocks on 890 are because it runs slack

NB gains aren't worth that much, some but maybe 1 sec per multi up.
I've never worked with a 790 DDR3 board, but it does seem they are more efficient Only that Rev 1 890GX UD3H and this 890FX board. I'd pull the UD3H out if it didn't have some serious issues with compatibility. I remember doing 1800 7-6-5-15 or something of the like in 1M, but running 1800 for any amount of time at any latency was extremely unstable. I remember running 1600 CAS 7 at 2.2v CAS 6 was impossible above 1500.

Infra's results were good clock wise, I guess a little off efficiency wise?