MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 96

Thread: LightPeak->Thunderbolt: Apple and Intel unveil Thunderbolt I/O technology

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    CroLand
    Posts
    379
    http://www.appleinsider.com/articles...ntil_2012.html

    So it is Apple exclusive tech till spring 2012 ?
    Phenom II x6 1055T | ASRock 880G Ex.3 | 560Ti FrozrII 1GB| Corsair Vengeance 1600 2x4GB | Win7 64 | M4 128GB

    VR Box - i5 6600 | MSI Mortar | Gigabyte G1 GTX 1060 | Viper 16GB DDR4 2400 | 256 SSD | Oculus Rift CV1 + Touch

  2. #2
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by n!Cola View Post
    http://www.appleinsider.com/articles...ntil_2012.html

    So it is Apple exclusive tech till spring 2012 ?
    If Apple helped fund development, then that may be the case but IMO it would be an absolutely ridiculous decision by both parties. It would choke off competition in a segment that is DRIVEN by the PC's widespread market share.

    Not allowing PC manufacturers to implement Thunderbolt from the onset will basically push it into a niche which is NOT something that will aid acceptance.

    Also, this little tidbit is patently wrong:

    The new standard is not backwardly compatible with USB 3.0, and Thunderbolt ports can't be added to existing PCs via an expansion card; Intel says the only way to have it is to buy a system or logic board that incorporates the new Thunderbolt controller chip. That's because the Thunderbolt chip needs direct access to both the system's video and PCI Express architecture.
    Intel details in their White Paper that backwards compatibility CAN be achieved by using a PCI-E bridge chip in parallel with a TB controller. This in effect would allow either add-in cards or stand-alone adaptors to be created. The press conference never mentioned that it wasn't possible, they just said that it would take additional logic to be implemented.

    Here's the passage from the White Paper:

    Users can always connect to their other non-Thunderbolt products at the end of a daisy chain by using Thunderbolt technology adapters (e.g., to connect to native PCI Express
    devices like eSata, Firewire, etc.). These adapters can be easily built using a Thunderbolt controller with off-the-shelf PCI Express-to-“other technology” controllers.
    Last edited by SKYMTL; 02-25-2011 at 06:22 AM.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,116
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    Also, this little tidbit is patently wrong:



    Intel details in their White Paper that backwards compatibility CAN be achieved by using a PCI-E bridge chip in parallel with a TB controller. This in effect would allow either add-in cards or stand-alone adaptors to be created. The press conference never mentioned that it wasn't possible, they just said that it would take additional logic to be implemented.

    Here's the passage from the White Paper:
    I think you are misunderstanding. that quote is talking about something different. it says a company can build an ethernet adapter that plugs into thunderbolt. meanwhile that mac site says a company cannot build a pci-e card that outputs thunderbolt because there is no way to get the video to the card.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by bamtan2 View Post
    I think you are misunderstanding. that quote is talking about something different. it says a company can build an ethernet adapter that plugs into thunderbolt. meanwhile that mac site says a company cannot build a pci-e card that outputs thunderbolt because there is no way to get the video to the card.
    There is nothing in the passage I quoted which indicates they are talking about Ethernet.

    And yes, just like the DisplayPort functions can be used without passing a PCI-E signal to a secondary device, the PCI-E signal can be sent without piggybacking on a display signal.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,116
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    There is nothing in the passage I quoted which indicates they are talking about Ethernet.

    And yes, just like the DisplayPort functions can be used without passing a PCI-E signal to a secondary device, the PCI-E signal can be sent without piggybacking on a display signal.
    It was an example. Let me clarify:

    Thunderbolt technology enables engineers to:

    Extend to reach other I/O technologies by using adapters that use widely available PCI Express controllers. It's simple to create a Gigabit Ethernet, or FireWire, or eSATA adapters using existing device PCI Express drivers.
    http://www.intel.com/technology/io/t...bolt/index.htm

    10:34 a.m. (Dong Ngo) : There won't be add-in TB adapters, you'll need a new computer/motherboard that supports TB.
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-20...ap;editorPicks


    So, like I said. There are no adapters which output Thunderbolt. There are only adapters for pcie devices which plug into Thunderbolt. "Adapter" is apparently not a clearly defined word right now, thus some confusion.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,116
    Quote Originally Posted by n!Cola View Post
    http://www.appleinsider.com/articles...ntil_2012.html

    So it is Apple exclusive tech till spring 2012 ?
    that report is unclear. basically bad reporting.

    PC makers are expected to begin adding Thunderbolt to their machines next spring, giving Apple a year to trailblaze the technology
    That to me reads like board makers dont want it. They're taking a wait-and-see approach and told intel "maybe next year". But since they're unclear, how can you tell?

    Well, a commenter says this: "According to the CNET article, it's not that Apple has an exclusive. Intel just thinks that PC manufacturers will probably wait until their next design cycles to implement."

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,821
    While this looks very cool, traditional Hard drives will have a very hard time putting this to good use. Until SSD drives come way down in price, its usability in the home market will be very limited.
    Desktop:
    Antec 300
    Foxcon A7AD-S 790GX
    8GB Gskill PC-1066@5/5/5/12
    PII X940 BE @3.6GHZ
    Sunbeam Core Contact
    2x 640GB in Raid 0+1
    4870 512MB@800/1000
    Vista Business 64bit W/ SP1

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •