MMM
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 76 to 94 of 94

Thread: Intel Ivy Bridge (22nm) News & Rumours Thread

  1. #76
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by alex-ro View Post
    who would then buy 2500k anymore since 2400k would mean same thing,since multi is unlocked? it would be nice to see a dual-core with hyper-threading unlocked,cheap and very good for benches :d
    +1!!!!!!!

  2. #77
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    81
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    +1!!!!!!!
    +1!
    ..::PC Signature::..
    ..........................:::::::::::::::::::Name-Tao Te Ching, Chapter 44
    E8500 Q820A966 E0 4.012 @1.26V w/Zalman 9500LED
    2G PNY XLR8 DDR2-1173@ 1013 4-4-4-10 @2.316V
    Visiontek Reference 4870 512M 833/1041 testing w/Zalman VF1000
    DFI UT P35 T2R!!!! w/-5/02 BIOS XP Pro 32Bit SP2
    Seagate es.2 250G 32M Hitachi Deskstar 750G 32M
    Plextor PX-716A TEAC 3.5" Floppy
    Thermaltake VA8003BWS w/ TT Toughpower 700 Watt [Seasonic]
    Arctic Cooling MX-2 Fluke 179 Digital Multimeter Tripplite Isobar6
    Antec Tricool 120MM 78CFM 2X-Silenx 120MM 90CFM Zalman 90MM w/bracket

  3. #78
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Demotte,IN
    Posts
    378
    IB will also be compatible with the LGA1155 interface
    http://www.tomshardware.com/news/San...155,12155.html

  4. #79
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    423
    Assuming IB comes with a PCIe 3.0 controller, if you dropped it in any current (P67) high end motherboard you'd be limited to PCIe 2.0 speeds right? Since most boards come equipped with PCIe 2.0 speced(?) multiplexing hardware (like ASMT lane switches) that allows either a x16/x0 or x8/x8 split.

    Ironically entry level boards where all CPU lanes are hardwired to a slot don't have this limitation and could take full advantage of the 3.0 controller (provided cougar point gets validated).

  5. #80
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    3,462
    yes i assume so, almost all boards use the ASMT MUX/DEMUX on the boards without NF200 and most are like this, each switch is connected to half the PCI-E lanes, 4 switches for 2 16x/8x slots.

  6. #81
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    Quote Originally Posted by sholvaco View Post
    Assuming IB comes with a PCIe 3.0 controller, if you dropped it in any current (P67) high end motherboard you'd be limited to PCIe 2.0 speeds right? Since most boards come equipped with PCIe 2.0 speced(?) multiplexing hardware (like ASMT lane switches) that allows either a x16/x0 or x8/x8 split.

    Ironically entry level boards where all CPU lanes are hardwired to a slot don't have this limitation and could take full advantage of the 3.0 controller (provided cougar point gets validated).


    This will be the case, ofc if you don't use a board with additional NF200 switch or and in most case only one GPU .. Peoples who use CFX and SLI and want 16/16x and the new "feature "will change their board ..
    for other who don't care they will be able to just update their CPU, flash the bios with the last one. and keep their system like this or upgrade later .

    Intel just bring back what it was possible before with Socket 775... when Process change and cpu series have push the same motherboard from
    Pentium 4-5 to first Core2Duo and Core2quad and different chipset.... P35-P45-X48 etc etc ..
    Many boards was just bring compatible by a bios update.
    Last edited by Lanek; 02-09-2011 at 03:37 PM.
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  7. #82
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  8. #83
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Quote Originally Posted by FlanK3r View Post
    Cebit 2011 also

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  9. #84
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    That's not a launch date of IvyB.,just a preview. SB will effectively launch (again) in April on 32nm and intel will milk it approx one year.Then in Q1 2012 or ,in best case, Q4 this year they will launch IB for mainstream desktop/mobile.

  10. #85
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    447
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny87au View Post
    Im betting Q4 2011 ivybridge wont be highend , Doesnt make sense why INTEL would release IVY highend when we're still waiting for high END Sandybridge.. But then again it happened with i5/i7..


    You literally just retyped what you quoted me saying..

    Quote Originally Posted by Tenknics View Post

    Ivy Bridge will launch after all the Sandy B's sku's (socket 2011 etc) have launched, not before so.
    Iron Lung 3.0 | Intel Core i7 6800k @ 4ghz | 32gb G.SKILL RIPJAW V DDR4-3200 @16-16-16-36 | ASUS ROG STRIX X99 GAMING + ASUS ROG GeForce GTX 1070 STRIX GAMING | Samsung 960 Pro 512GB + Samsung 840 EVO + 4TB HDD | 55" Samsung KS8000 + 30" Dell u3011 via Displayport - @ 6400x2160

  11. #86
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    743
    So is there going to be a desktop mainstream version of Ivy Bridge? Sounds like its going to be over $500

  12. #87
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    447
    Quote Originally Posted by kadozer View Post
    So is there going to be a desktop mainstream version of Ivy Bridge? Sounds like its going to be over $500

    I don't understand how these questions creep up everytime intel is about to release, or talks about a future release, in the core microARCH.
    Not to sound rude, but have you not been paying attention to the last 3 launches since 2006? tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock?
    Nothing is changing with sandy and ivy. Just like Conroe/Penryn and Nehalem/Westmere before it, Sandy/Ivy will have skus that cover all segments of the market.

    Mobile/Desktop/Server - and you know they will have mutiple skus within each segment to cover all the markets, enthusiast, performance, mainstream etc.


    Nothing new.
    Iron Lung 3.0 | Intel Core i7 6800k @ 4ghz | 32gb G.SKILL RIPJAW V DDR4-3200 @16-16-16-36 | ASUS ROG STRIX X99 GAMING + ASUS ROG GeForce GTX 1070 STRIX GAMING | Samsung 960 Pro 512GB + Samsung 840 EVO + 4TB HDD | 55" Samsung KS8000 + 30" Dell u3011 via Displayport - @ 6400x2160

  13. #88
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Peoples Republic of Kalifornia
    Posts
    1,541
    Quote Originally Posted by sin0822 View Post
    no it looks legit, i believe some boards, i saw said they support the ivy. but i might have misread.

    Eitherway its still a sandy bridge die shrink, idk how powerful it will be.

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the initial rumors surrounding Sandy Bridge claim it would be compatible with the recently released (late 2009) 1156 P55 socket boards?

    Oh yeah.... I think they said all of us 1156 owners "would only need a simple bios update" to run Sandy Bridge. I sure miss seeing sockets with very long longevity like 775.

    "If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government"
    -- Alexander Hamilton

  14. #89
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    469
    Oh yeah.... I think they said all of us 1156 owners "would only need a simple bios update" to run Sandy Bridge. I sure miss seeing sockets with very long longevity like 775.
    that is why i am so hesitant to upgrade my system. i do want pcie 3.0 for a little bit of future proofing but not if intel is going to drop support for it less than 2 years down the line. apparently the high end will be socket 2011 so thats another socket. if they would keep 1155 for the mainstream and 2011 for the performance/server market for a while i would be happen

    i have an aging 775 dual core and im itching to upgrade

  15. #90
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    At this rythm you will never upgrade your PC ..
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  16. #91
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    1,653
    Quote Originally Posted by phantomferrari View Post
    that is why i am so hesitant to upgrade my system. i do want pcie 3.0 for a little bit of future proofing but not if intel is going to drop support for it less than 2 years down the line. apparently the high end will be socket 2011 so thats another socket. if they would keep 1155 for the mainstream and 2011 for the performance/server market for a while i would be happen

    i have an aging 775 dual core and im itching to upgrade
    Might as well wait for 16nm, it's just down the road.
    i5 2500K @ 4.9GHz+ 8GB G-Skill RipJaws DDR3-2000 @1600Mhz CAS 6 Asus P8P67 Pro CrossFire 6970's @ 950/1450
    Xeon X5677 @ 4.5Ghz 6GB G-Skill RipJaws DDR3-2000 @1600Mhz CAS 7 Gigabyte EX58-UD5 4870x2
    i7-880 @ 4.2Ghz+ (still playing) 4GB G-Skill RipJaws DDR3-2000 @2300Mhz CAS 9 Asus Maximus III Formula MSI Hawk 5770

  17. #92
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    yeah 2012

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  18. #93
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    Quote Originally Posted by kadozer View Post
    So is there going to be a desktop mainstream version of Ivy Bridge? Sounds like its going to be over $500
    Really ? You're in the know ? How is Ivy Bridge ?


  19. #94
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    743
    Quote Originally Posted by Olivon View Post
    Really ? You're in the know ? How is Ivy Bridge ?

    Its great brah.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •