AMD Bulldozer server info

[Shadov]

I'd settle for a 6 core processor that can beat the competitions 4...... Throwing more and more cores onto a chip is kinda pointless when software doesn't take advantage of it. Come on AMD lets get see some performance!

I see here some misinterpretation... 4 vs 6?

Keep in mind its not only about core count, but design choices. Intel decided to add 30% die space to have HT, which again gives them 8 threads. AMD decided to invest into a smaller core, which again enables them to fit 6 on a consumer CPU class.

Again why are we focusing on 4 vs 6, forgetting about the HT part which is part of the die and transistor count?

To summarize I hope we will get an affordable solution with good performance, no matter of approach taken by the producer (real cores, ht threads ect.).