Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 33 of 33

Thread: Opinions on safe daily voltage for SB

  1. #26
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Coimbra - Portugal
    Posts
    699
    Quote Originally Posted by Metroid View Post
    If it was a gem then it would not have died.
    Yeah, cause I was only aiming for 5Ghz with this new plantform, if it was a gem it would have done that with less 0.1v at least

  2. #27
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    493
    Quote Originally Posted by st0ned View Post
    Just to warn all of you, my CPU has officially degraded. I haven't played with the other volts so it mush ( should ) be vcore related . I wouldn't say also that 1.45v is safe, since 1.5 isn't. Maybe those 1.38v wondering around the internet aint so that unreal
    Sorry to hear about the chip degrading... Since you said it still runs stock will it run 4.5 now? I'm thinking maybe clocks with 1.35v to 1.375v load for longer term use.
    Ryzen 9 on the test bench... Sometimes older generation/tech as well.

  3. #28
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Coimbra - Portugal
    Posts
    699
    I dont know yet, but I'll give it a go, and live feedback after it ends this stock run

  4. #29
    SLC
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    2,795
    I will probably be running in the 1.45-1.49 range under water for 24/7, but I won't cry if the chip dies... People give all kinds of overly conservative estimates. I ran 1.5 vtt and vcore through my i7 860 and that chip lasted a whole year before it died. If you really don't want your chip failing then I would stay under 1.40.

  5. #30
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Coimbra - Portugal
    Posts
    699
    I ran my i920 in that conditions too. But a two day degradation is too much for my to handle.

  6. #31
    SLC
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    2,795
    Quote Originally Posted by st0ned View Post
    I ran my i920 in that conditions too. But a two day degradation is too much for my to handle.
    Yeah but you ran Linx for a long time. This would make it degrade faster I would imagine. Nonetheless, 1.5+ does not seem safe. I'll try 1.45.

  7. #32
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    80
    The safe voltage is ever decreasing as the size of the transistors gets smaller. With the 2600K's being manufacturered on 32nm verses the 45nm of the orignial i7's its safe to say the true safe 24/7 voltage is less than 1.45V as recommended at the time. On the older i7 intel's recommended safe voltage was 1.35V. Those 2 year old chips have for the most part survived (at least in my case) at 1.4V constantly.

    1.5V seems high for a 24/7 build, I'd say 1.4V would be more appropriate, that still represents a 40% increase in voltage. For suicide benchmarking 1.5V might be a little low!

  8. #33
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Sofia, Bulgaria
    Posts
    187
    I would have to say 1.375v for air cooling and 1.425v for water cooling. If you have top air cooling and don't get more than 70 degrees C with 1.4v should be okay aswell.
    24/7 Asrock P67 Extreme4|2500K @ 4600 @ 1.38v|2x2GB A-data value|XpertVision 8500GT 600/450|WD 6400AAKS|CM 690 + 3 x 140mm + 2 x 120mm|Zalman CPNS-10X Performa|Chieftec 750-14C|Zalman MFC1 Plus

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •