Maybe 2012 or late 2011, I'll get a SB or two to play with in the meantimeI think ill convert my main rig to a 2600k and put that 980x out to crunching pasture.
The current SBs are great rigs but I'm a little unexcited by the long delay in the high end SB, I want more crunching power than a Gulftown/Westmere. For Intel it was a great decision to focus on the 4c and 2c models because at this time who really needs 8c or 16c rigs? (besides us). Games and such don't need the cores and windows and IE will run fine on much less.
100k takes 16 hexas and some change, not really looking to double+ that number of rigs. where would I sleep? my house would be overrun with crunchers. If a 4c/8t 32nm does 6k or so boinc then I can't wait to see what a 22nm "Tock" Ivy Bridge monster will do with 8c or 12c. I would settle for a 8c/16t SB in the meantime, 12k for a single socket... And a dualie
![]()
Tech loyalties can be a bit silly but I still have mine based on my own experiences, as always YMMVAnd come to think of it I've never really had a terrible mobo, I do have one board from a manufacturer that refuses to OC the 980x in it past 4GHz, and that mediocre board did cost more than a UD3
Another random thought, why no EVGA P67's? Did I miss some sort of news about EVGA not making mobos anymore? Edit nm, http://www.evga.com/articles/00604/ they just are late to launch it seems.
I do have a question regarding the Asus P67's. Why is the Intel nic considered an advantage vs Realtek, is there really that much of a difference in the nic?




the team could sure use it if were ever gonna catch up with team2ch

I think ill convert my main rig to a 2600k and put that 980x out to crunching pasture.


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks