Copying between my two arrays is one of the first things I did haha. It goes between 450 and 520mb/s. Seems to be the same in both directions. Windows limitation?Originally Posted by alfaunits
Have you got those X25-Es in R0? Just for fun, could you try how fast a file copy from one to the other takes? (both directions)
TC->Big file copy would be most precise.
I was among the first (well company was...) to get this back in 2008. They f***ing took waaay too long to get it released, that it wasn't really available in 2008! We got our money back, and decided to go with X25-Es x4. Maybe stuff that runs on IoDrive is faster, but we saved considerable time not waiting for IoDrive(it's the same as getting a car/house via credit or saving up and buying it - in the end, Credit costs more, but you get to use the car/house all those years as well)
No degradation yet. I've written 200GB to the device (there is a handy tracking tool for read/written GB in the software) and AS SSD numbers + iometer reads look identical thus far. I have not tested writes properly however. Looks like it has very good garbage collection. No, there is no trim on the device but secure erase can be done with one button through software and it is very quick. The plan is to hammer it with 100+gb of 4kb random writes and then see how it performs after.WowThat is the fastest run time I’ve seen. (WEI)
The performance/ $ cost ratio makes this a really good buy. Incredible for a single device. Are you seeing any degradation?
By the way, I tested this specifically, and the ram does not temporarily boost any figures. All the performance values are 100% sustainable. No cache no nothing.
All the reviews for the device on the net are old. There have been several firmware and software updates since then which increased performance. I was NOT expecting such crazy low QD performance and 0.35ms access times...
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks