MMM
Page 16 of 34 FirstFirst ... 61314151617181926 ... LastLast
Results 376 to 400 of 828

Thread: AMD Radeon HD6950/6970(Cayman) Reviews

  1. #376
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    300
    Haha wow, i've come back to a very thick atmosphere this morning.

    Needless to say, i've got my 6950 sitting here right beside me ready to install Just downloading the 10.12 CCC2 preview. Benchmarks and clocking results soon to follow.
    -
    Core i7 860 @ 3.80GHz, 1.28v | GA-P55A-UD4 | G.Skill Ripjaw 4GB DDR3 @ 1900MHz 7-9-8-24 1N, 1.57v | HIS HD 6950 2GB, 1536sp @ 900/1400, 1.10v | Samsung F3 500GB | Thermaltake 750W | Windows 7 64bit | Air

    Crunching away...

  2. #377
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,743
    Why has no one done crossfire at 2560x1600 with 2 6970s and compared them to the 580 GTX SLI other than anandtech?

    here's another crossfire review from guru3d with the 6950s

    http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon...irex-review/12


    Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card

    LSI series raid controller
    SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
    Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
    OSes: Linux and Windows x64

  3. #378
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    447
    i really wish Adobe's Mercury Engine wasn't cuda only...I really would like to get a 2GB 6850..but noooo. Stupid adobe...Im sure got paid off. I have to wait for non-ref 570's to come out with hopefully 2GB+ VRAM..
    Iron Lung 3.0 | Intel Core i7 6800k @ 4ghz | 32gb G.SKILL RIPJAW V DDR4-3200 @16-16-16-36 | ASUS ROG STRIX X99 GAMING + ASUS ROG GeForce GTX 1070 STRIX GAMING | Samsung 960 Pro 512GB + Samsung 840 EVO + 4TB HDD | 55" Samsung KS8000 + 30" Dell u3011 via Displayport - @ 6400x2160

  4. #379
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,550
    Quote Originally Posted by Tenknics View Post
    i really wish Adobe's Mercury Engine wasn't cuda only...I really would like to get a 2GB 6850..but noooo. Stupid adobe...Im sure got paid off. I have to wait for non-ref 570's to come out with hopefully 2GB+ VRAM..
    AMD doesn't want to support CUDA

    Does adobe still use the gpu if you have it a secondary card (likea physx card) and not as the primary display card?

  5. #380
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    1,940
    Crossfire scaling really seems to be superb as 6970s in CF take down the 580sli in alot of games while the single gpu struggles to keep up with nvidia


    speculation: the new dual graphics engine really looks like on-chip crossfire with shared memory; amd may be able to use an off-chip command processor+pcie switch based on this change in the next gen to finally reach the holy grail of 100% scaling without driver issues (this statement does not imply any shared resources, memory still has to be doubled)
    Core i7 2600k|HD 6950|8GB RipJawsX|2x 128gb Samsung SSD 830 Raid0|Asus Sabertooth P67
    Seasonic X-560|Corsair 650D|2x WD Red 3TB Raid1|WD Green 3TB|Asus Xonar Essence STX


    Core i3 2100|HD 7770|8GB RipJawsX|128gb Samsung SSD 830|Asrock Z77 Pro4-M
    Bequiet! E9 400W|Fractal Design Arc Mini|3x Hitachi 7k1000.C|Asus Xonar DX


    Dell Latitude E6410|Core i7 620m|8gb DDR3|WXGA+ Screen|Nvidia Quadro NVS3100
    256gb Samsung PB22-J|Intel Wireless 6300|Sierra Aircard MC8781|WD Scorpio Blue 1TB


    Harman Kardon HK1200|Vienna Acoustics Brandnew|AKG K240 Monitor 600ohm|Sony CDP 228ESD

  6. #381
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    well anandtech hinted that the 6990 has some new features, so who knows what all this new stuff means...

  7. #382
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Tokyo, Japan
    Posts
    328
    Quote Originally Posted by zerazax View Post
    well anandtech hinted that the 6990 has some new features, so who knows what all this new stuff means...
    Probably more hand polished parts this time.

  8. #383
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by zerazax View Post
    well anandtech hinted that the 6990 has some new features, so who knows what all this new stuff means...
    The features center on somehow reducing power consumption while holding rendering operations at near-HD6900 levels.

  9. #384
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Tokyo, Japan
    Posts
    328
    Quote Originally Posted by Dimitriman View Post
    Count on it that in the next six months nvidia will take back most of the dx11 market share it lost in 2010.
    I would be surprised to see that. The high end is way over what's needed right now for games unless you use 30" or multimonitor setup. I do not see that change suddenly by the games of next year.

    So I think 560 and it's competitors will decide market share, but who knows.

  10. #385
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Space
    Posts
    769
    Quote Originally Posted by Kuroimaho View Post
    I would be surprised to see that. The high end is way over what's needed right now for games unless you use 30" or multimonitor setup. I do not see that change suddenly by the games of next year.

    So I think 560 and it's competitors will decide market share, but who knows.
    Is that the 6950 territory?

  11. #386
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    Quote Originally Posted by Motiv View Post
    Is that the 6950 territory?
    Seems really close ...

  12. #387
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,116
    there has also been hint that fusion graphics will be synergistic somehow with 6900 graphics. obviously that means either power saving or performance combining.

  13. #388
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Space
    Posts
    769
    Quote Originally Posted by Olivon View Post
    Seems really close ...
    It just seemed an odd comment he made. Almost like there wasn't anything in that segment yet. I would of thought the 6870 and 6950 filled it quite well currently.

  14. #389
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    Quote Originally Posted by Motiv View Post
    It just seemed an odd comment he made. Almost like there wasn't anything in that segment yet. I would of thought the 6870 and 6950 filled it quite well currently.
    Okay, my bad

    http://bbs.expreview.com/thread-38537-1-1.html

    The source said the new GF104 (in fact GF114) an initial release on January 20, frequency 820MHz/1640/4000MHz, 384SP, at this frequency under the high yield. The only regrettable, the public version of video memory is 1GB. I estimate that under this standard, easily get rid of HD 5870 is not a problem.

  15. #390
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Lima, Peru
    Posts
    600
    There's the possibility of a 1GB 6950(with price between 6870 & 6950 2GB) and still be faster than a 560 with 1GB also.

    Any more than that at it will kill their "new gen" 570. Now, if they want a marketshare wars some sacrifices need to be made.
    Last edited by Nintendork; 12-16-2010 at 07:10 AM.
    Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
    | Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"

    Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
    Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)

    Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
    Reality check

  16. #391
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by Nintendork View Post
    There's the possibility of a 1GB 6950(with price between 6870 & 6950 2GB) and still be faster than a 560 with 1GB also.

    Any more than that at it will kill their "new gen" 570. Now, if they want a marketshare wars some sacrifices need to be made.
    Actually, AMD has already announced it. Price ~$275.

  17. #392
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Space
    Posts
    769
    Quote Originally Posted by Nintendork View Post
    There's the possibility of a 1GB 6950(with price between 6870 & 6950 2GB) and still be faster than a 560 with 1GB also.

    Any more than that at it will kill their "new gen" 570. Now, if they want a market share wars some sacrifices need to be made.
    So we have a 560 out at the end of Jan. Looks like it will be competing with the 6870, which means the 6950 has it's own market sector for a while. Well that is unless the 560 with 384SP, isn't correct, and it has more shaders.

    To me it still looks like Nvidia is struggling a little. They certainly have the cards, they just seem like they are maybe a month or two behind where they would like to be. AMD are still pumping out newer cards, and having stock of them.

    The 570 is still a beautiful card. I would say it and the 6950, are the two cards that will sell by the bucket load.

  18. #393
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Space
    Posts
    769
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    Actually, AMD has already announced it. Price ~$275.
    is that the 1GB version of the 6950?

  19. #394
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Anyone spot any reviews which tested Eyefinity under crossfire? With the 5Ks, crossfire often worked but the stutteriness was such that it was not an effective help for EF users.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  20. #395
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    IND
    Posts
    1,038
    REVIEW 6950 CF by me,...............here :

    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=263715

  21. #396
    L-l-look at you, hacker.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    4,644
    This whole thing is making it amazingly difficult to choose.

    I was fairly confident I'd be going nVidia this generation, as I'd been predicting that the 69xx would disappoint compared to the 58xx series what with the unexpected transition back to the larger node. However, the performance of the 6970 at very high resolutions (2560 and Eyefinity res') is absolutely stellar and in many cases, as far as I've seen, at or above 580 performance, as is multi-card scaling. Further, "modern" games with heavy use of geometry, tesselation etc seem to favour the 6970 again (a la DiRT, Stalker COP, Metro), which suggests that the 6970 may well be a better future investment.

    All this means that for me the 6970 is likely to outperform the 580 at the resolutions I play at, while costing about $250 less than the 580. Was not expecting this at all.
    Rig specs
    CPU: i7 5960X Mobo: Asus X99 Deluxe RAM: 4x4GB G.Skill DDR4-2400 CAS-15 VGA: 2x eVGA GTX680 Superclock PSU: Corsair AX1200

    Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism



  22. #397
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    Quote Originally Posted by SoulsCollective View Post
    This whole thing is making it amazingly difficult to choose.

    I was fairly confident I'd be going nVidia this generation, as I'd been predicting that the 69xx would disappoint compared to the 58xx series what with the unexpected transition back to the larger node. However, the performance of the 6970 at very high resolutions (2560 and Eyefinity res') is absolutely stellar and in many cases, as far as I've seen, at or above 580 performance, as is multi-card scaling. Further, "modern" games with heavy use of geometry, tesselation etc seem to favour the 6970 again (a la DiRT, Stalker COP, Metro), which suggests that the 6970 may well be a better future investment.

    All this means that for me the 6970 is likely to outperform the 580 at the resolutions I play at, while costing about $250 less than the 580. Was not expecting this at all.
    I noticed this as well. It's a little silly to say the nvidia cards are strictly better by comparing games where the min, avg, and max are well over 60.
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

  23. #398
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    328
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    Anyone spot any reviews which tested Eyefinity under crossfire? With the 5Ks, crossfire often worked but the stutteriness was such that it was not an effective help for EF users.
    Only this:

    http://www.kitguru.net/components/gr...cfx-review/22/


  24. #399
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,250
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    Anyone spot any reviews which tested Eyefinity under crossfire? With the 5Ks, crossfire often worked but the stutteriness was such that it was not an effective help for EF users.
    6850 crossfire BC2 and lotro, 5760x1080 no issues what so ever, I play BC2 at low settings as I aim for max fps, best gaming experience ever for me.
    4670k 4.6ghz 1.22v watercooled CPU/GPU - Asus Z87-A - 290 1155mhz/1250mhz - Kingston Hyper Blu 8gb -crucial 128gb ssd - EyeFunity 5040x1050 120hz - CM atcs840 - Corsair 750w -sennheiser hd600 headphones - Asus essence stx - G400 and steelseries 6v2 -windows 8 Pro 64bit Best OS used - - 9500p 3dmark11 (one of the 26% that isnt confused on xtreme forums)

  25. #400
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Space
    Posts
    769
    Quote Originally Posted by SoulsCollective View Post
    This whole thing is making it amazingly difficult to choose.

    I was fairly confident I'd be going nVidia this generation, as I'd been predicting that the 69xx would disappoint compared to the 58xx series what with the unexpected transition back to the larger node. However, the performance of the 6970 at very high resolutions (2560 and Eyefinity res') is absolutely stellar and in many cases, as far as I've seen, at or above 580 performance, as is multi-card scaling. Further, "modern" games with heavy use of geometry, tesselation etc seem to favour the 6970 again (a la DiRT, Stalker COP, Metro), which suggests that the 6970 may well be a better future investment.

    All this means that for me the 6970 is likely to outperform the 580 at the resolutions I play at, while costing about $250 less than the 580. Was not expecting this at all.
    That's where the problems lie.

    At 1080p, the 6970 is a little bit under powered, once you start raising the resolution up, it becomes a bit of a monster. I'm trying to work out if it's good at DX11 or bad (same with AA). I can't fathom out the scores from the reviews, they seem everywhere.

Page 16 of 34 FirstFirst ... 61314151617181926 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •