Page 148 of 149 FirstFirst ... 4898138145146147148149 LastLast
Results 3,676 to 3,700 of 3724

Thread: AMD Cayman info (or rumor)

  1. #3676
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    West hartford, CT
    Posts
    2,804
    Hmm what to do now....
    FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
    Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
    G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
    MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
    OCZ ZX 850w psu
    Lian-Li Lancool K62
    Samsung 830 128g
    2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
    Win7 Home 64bit
    My Rig

  2. #3677
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    Lol, I see you're sticking to your own guidelines. Btw, the 6970 isn't faster than the 570. They both get their lumps in but it's a wash.
    I'll grant you that the definition of "garbage" is debatable, but it seems way outside of realistic discourse for this topic. The 6970 is indeed faster than the 570, so I'm not sure where you're going with that.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  3. #3678
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Chicago,Illinois
    Posts
    1,182
    Quote Originally Posted by tbone8ty View Post
    Hmm what to do now....
    Wait for 11.1



  4. #3679
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,250
    lot of people are hired by nvidia to spread fud on forums.
    4670k 4.6ghz 1.22v watercooled CPU/GPU - Asus Z87-A - 290 1155mhz/1250mhz - Kingston Hyper Blu 8gb -crucial 128gb ssd - EyeFunity 5040x1050 120hz - CM atcs840 - Corsair 750w -sennheiser hd600 headphones - Asus essence stx - G400 and steelseries 6v2 -windows 8 Pro 64bit Best OS used - - 9500p 3dmark11 (one of the 26% that isnt confused on xtreme forums)

  5. #3680
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    so does 6970 have 1920 sps or not ??
    Quote Originally Posted by LesGrossman View Post
    So for the last 3 months Nvidia talked about Uniengine and then Uniengine and more Uniengine and finally Uniengine. And then takes the best 5 seconds from all the benchmark run, makes a graph and then proudly shows it everywhere.

  6. #3681
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    so does 6970 have 1920 sps or not ??
    No.

  7. #3682
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    that makes me sad ... very sad .....
    Quote Originally Posted by LesGrossman View Post
    So for the last 3 months Nvidia talked about Uniengine and then Uniengine and more Uniengine and finally Uniengine. And then takes the best 5 seconds from all the benchmark run, makes a graph and then proudly shows it everywhere.

  8. #3683
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    743
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    that makes me sad ... very sad .....
    There's always next October
    There will be another AMD hype speculation thread with wild rumors. I'm convinced AMD will always go for smaller efficient low cost chip strategy forever despite what pre hype rumors will say.

  9. #3684
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    that makes me sad ... very sad .....

  10. #3685
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    215
    Give it 6 months and you might have the 1920 version out. AMD's 580GTX

  11. #3686
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    743
    Quote Originally Posted by tdream View Post
    Give it 6 months and you might have the 1920 version out. AMD's 580GTX
    As long as Antilles or any dual gpu card exist in the pipeline, I wouldn't put money on it. That goes for future generations.

  12. #3687
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    215
    Quote Originally Posted by kadozer View Post
    As long as Antilles or any dual gpu card exist in the pipeline, I wouldn't put money on it. That goes for future generations.
    Not necessarily, all dual cards are based on the single card performance which has it's own market. It's not like they'll stop making single card gpus in the future.

  13. #3688
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    743
    Quote Originally Posted by tdream View Post
    Not necessarily, all dual cards are based on the single card performance which has it's own market. It's not like they'll stop making single card gpus in the future.
    Going 1920sps would mean going outside their small efficient single chip strategy. Since they started the dual gpu card as halo card strategy they've stuck to it. This epic long thread and others like it across the net is proof that it will be wishful thinking for them to deviate.

  14. #3689
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    above USA...below USSR
    Posts
    1,186
    i think theres room for two more cards, 6980 and 6990; one 1920 and one dual gpu. Jan will be an interesting month thanks to ces.
    Case-Coolermaster Cosmos S
    MoBo- ASUS Crosshair IV
    Graphics Card-XFX R9 280X [out for RMA] using HD5870
    Hard Drive-Kingston 240Gig V300 master Seagate 160Gb slave Seagate 250Gb slave Seagate 500Gb slave Western Digital 500Gb
    CPU-AMD FX-8320 5Ghz
    RAM 8Gig Corshair c8
    Logitech 5.1 Z5500 BOOST22
    300Gb of MUSICA!!


    Steam ID: alphamonkeywoman
    http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/933ab/

  15. #3690
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    743
    Quote Originally Posted by Monkeywoman View Post
    i think theres room for two more cards, 6980 and 6990; one 1920 and one dual gpu. Jan will be an interesting month thanks to ces.

    Will be interesting to see MSRP for Antilles. . I would love to see it happen myself but I wouldn't hold my breath.



    Cayman XT $379
    Cayman XT refresh with more SPs $470?
    Antilles $600?

  16. #3691
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    That what I thought about the gtx 480. In the end, it only got 3 or 4%. It was 14% faster than a 5870 initially and is now maybe a few points better than that.

    For driver improvement I will try to be hopeful because I still can't see AMD screwing up this badly, but reality probably says for a single card, maybe 5% at best and that is not going to happen overnight.

    AMD obviously wanted this card to be faster. A beefed up cooler, larger chip and 2x the memory(which is faster and more expensive) and likely a more complex PCB to deal with the power and they charge less than the initial prices of a 5870. Considering how little money they made on the 58xx generation, it doesn't make sense for them to decrease their margins.

    If antilles can be 600 dollars and have a non reduced spec'ed 6970(I don't care about power, I bought a ax1200 for that and it is still in the box waiting for a new videocard), I would consider buying that.

    But as is, I can see even NV competing pretty well and releasing a deal card to deal with antilles.

    Something tells me we won't be seeing so much improvements because the card only has 1536 shaders or 384 real shaders even though I want to believe there is more there. Frigg, I bought a ax1200 and a corsair 800d for a new monster videocard and it has been sitting here for the last six months, nothing really warrants its because we haven't really had any real monster cards(the 5970 was close back in the day, but the specs were reduced like crazy).
    I think your missing the point? They didnt go with there new architecure because tsmc fooked them around so they had to stick to there current 45nm instead of moving forward and had to cut back the shader count... I say wait for 6990 instead of turning this thread into a flame war..

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  17. #3692
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    491
    For the people waiting on drivers to fix the performance, we're still waiting on those for the 2900xt aswell!

    These cards are decent enough to make me question purchasing a GTX570, which I wanted really badly up until this morning. Now I'm wondering if the extra memory and maybe a little better performance is worth losing folding power and display capabilites for. Seriously tough decision
    E8600 4.5ghz folder
    Asus P5Q Deluxe
    Enermax Galaxy DXX 1000W
    2x2GB OCZ Reaper PC8500
    2xPowercolor HD 2900XT (modded to run constant 3d clocks)
    Swiftech H220 Ultra Apex

  18. #3693
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    That what I thought about the gtx 480. In the end, it only got 3 or 4%. It was 14% faster than a 5870 initially and is now maybe a few points better than that.

    For driver improvement I will try to be hopeful because I still can't see AMD screwing up this badly, but reality probably says for a single card, maybe 5% at best and that is not going to happen overnight.
    You gave your own evidence for driver improvments. How did the GTX 480 go from 15-20% faster than the 5870 at launch to less than that since then? And that's including the fact more Nvidia friendly titles have been released since (e.g. LP2, HAWX2).

    Hint: the 5870 got some major boosts

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigchrome View Post
    For the people waiting on drivers to fix the performance, we're still waiting on those for the 2900xt aswell!

    These cards are decent enough to make me question purchasing a GTX570, which I wanted really badly up until this morning. Now I'm wondering if the extra memory and maybe a little better performance is worth losing folding power and display capabilites for. Seriously tough decision
    Big difference is that the 2900XT's were quickly shelved/forgotten... they were around only 6 months.

    Biggest evidence for driver changes is the fact that 69xx performance ranges everywhere from well above 5870 to only 5870 and occasionally below. Methinks the change from VLIW5->VLIW4 is a big issue, because code has been so heavily optimized for VLIW5 since 4800's AND 5800's have been using it. Makes no sense for 384 SIMD card to be less than 320 SIMD unless there's some issues with compiling vector instructions

    See: 5870 release scores/benches (below 4870X2 performance) to today's #'s (just 10-20% below the 480/570 depending on the review you look at).

    Also, what display capabilities are you looking for? If you're going single card, there isn't much display wise the 570's can do the 69xx's cant at this point

  19. #3694
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    241
    Quote Originally Posted by zerazax View Post
    You gave your own evidence for driver improvments. How did the GTX 480 go from 15-20% faster than the 5870 at launch to less than that since then? And that's including the fact more Nvidia friendly titles have been released since (e.g. LP2, HAWX2).

    Hint: the 5870 got some major boosts
    If you base your purchase on hopes for driver improvement keep in mind one thing, by the time drivers got optimized , new cards got released. And that's a long time to wait, by then it won't matter anymore.
    .:. Obsidian 750D .:. i7 5960X .:. EVGA Titan .:. G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR4 32GB .:. CORSAIR HX850i .:. Asus X99-DELUXE .:. Crucial M4 SSD 512GB .:.

  20. #3695
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    What they did is massively improve the back end of the design ,all on 40nm.Now all they will do is use 28nm to scale up SP count,IMO big time. I can see 2xVLIW4 we have in Cayman,with 28nm version of NI. They are already awfully close to 580GTX with Cayman XT,especially in high resolution new DX11/tessellation heavy games. If AMD and NV effectively double the compute power with next gens,we may have a deja vu next year:AMD having 5-10% less performance with 36-40% smaller die- a clear design efficiency advantage at the same node.

  21. #3696
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    743
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    What they did is massively improve the back end of the design ,all on 40nm.Now all they will do is use 28nm to scale up SP count,IMO big time. I can see 2xVLIW4 we have in Cayman,with 28nm version of NI. They are already awfully close to 580GTX with Cayman XT,especially in high resolution new DX11/tessellation heavy games. If AMD and NV effectively double the compute power with next gens,we may have a deja vu next year:AMD having 5-10% less performance with 36-40% smaller die- a clear design efficiency advantage at the same node.
    In other words different die same relative performance.

    Nvidia = top performing at premium price

    AMD single gpu high end = Performance for dollar @+/-10%

    2011 = new thread, new year, same speculation

  22. #3697
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    In the Land down -under-
    Posts
    4,452
    "AMD Antilles DUAL GPU info (or rumor) thread- NO FANBOYS ALLOWED

    Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?

  23. #3698
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    241
    If i am not mistaken at 28nm will be Keplar, new arch. If AMD keeps same arch just doubles shaders it might be different ball game vs Keplar.

    .:. Obsidian 750D .:. i7 5960X .:. EVGA Titan .:. G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR4 32GB .:. CORSAIR HX850i .:. Asus X99-DELUXE .:. Crucial M4 SSD 512GB .:.

  24. #3699
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    743
    Quote Originally Posted by -=DVS=- View Post
    If i am not mistaken at 28nm will be Keplar, new arch. If AMD keeps same arch just doubles shaders it might be different ball game vs Keplar.

    [IMG]http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/3793/nvidiakepler.jpgIMG]
    That Kepler should now read 2012 since its delayed.

  25. #3700
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    141
    6970 because of Bitstreaming audio.
    Intel i7 3770K @ 4.5ghz
    Asus P8Z77-V
    8GB Crucial 1866Mhz CL9
    AMD Sapphire Radeon HD 6970
    Crucial RealSSD M4 128GB
    2x WD Raptor X
    Enermax Galaxy 1000W DXX
    NEC LCD2690WUXi
    Yamaha RX-V667 Receiver
    Monitor Audio Vector 5.1

Page 148 of 149 FirstFirst ... 4898138145146147148149 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •