Hmm what to do now....
Hmm what to do now....
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
lot of people are hired by nvidia to spread fud on forums.
4670k 4.6ghz 1.22v watercooled CPU/GPU - Asus Z87-A - 290 1155mhz/1250mhz - Kingston Hyper Blu 8gb -crucial 128gb ssd - EyeFunity 5040x1050 120hz - CM atcs840 - Corsair 750w -sennheiser hd600 headphones - Asus essence stx - G400 and steelseries 6v2 -windows 8 Pro 64bit Best OS used - - 9500p 3dmark11(one of the 26% that isnt confused on xtreme forums)
Give it 6 months and you might have the 1920 version out. AMD's 580GTX![]()
Going 1920sps would mean going outside their small efficient single chip strategy. Since they started the dual gpu card as halo card strategy they've stuck to it. This epic long thread and others like it across the net is proof that it will be wishful thinking for them to deviate.
i think theres room for two more cards, 6980 and 6990; one 1920 and one dual gpu. Jan will be an interesting month thanks to ces.
Case-Coolermaster Cosmos S
MoBo- ASUS Crosshair IV
Graphics Card-XFX R9 280X [out for RMA] using HD5870
Hard Drive-Kingston 240Gig V300 master Seagate 160Gb slave Seagate 250Gb slave Seagate 500Gb slave Western Digital 500Gb
CPU-AMD FX-8320 5Ghz
RAM 8Gig Corshair c8
Logitech 5.1 Z5500 BOOST22
300Gb of MUSICA!!
Steam ID: alphamonkeywoman
http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/933ab/
I think your missing the point? They didnt go with there new architecure because tsmc fooked them around so they had to stick to there current 45nm instead of moving forward and had to cut back the shader count... I say wait for 6990 instead of turning this thread into a flame war..
Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?
For the people waiting on drivers to fix the performance, we're still waiting on those for the 2900xt aswell!
These cards are decent enough to make me question purchasing a GTX570, which I wanted really badly up until this morning. Now I'm wondering if the extra memory and maybe a little better performance is worth losing folding power and display capabilites for. Seriously tough decision![]()
You gave your own evidence for driver improvments. How did the GTX 480 go from 15-20% faster than the 5870 at launch to less than that since then? And that's including the fact more Nvidia friendly titles have been released since (e.g. LP2, HAWX2).
Hint: the 5870 got some major boosts
Big difference is that the 2900XT's were quickly shelved/forgotten... they were around only 6 months.
Biggest evidence for driver changes is the fact that 69xx performance ranges everywhere from well above 5870 to only 5870 and occasionally below. Methinks the change from VLIW5->VLIW4 is a big issue, because code has been so heavily optimized for VLIW5 since 4800's AND 5800's have been using it. Makes no sense for 384 SIMD card to be less than 320 SIMD unless there's some issues with compiling vector instructions
See: 5870 release scores/benches (below 4870X2 performance) to today's #'s (just 10-20% below the 480/570 depending on the review you look at).
Also, what display capabilities are you looking for? If you're going single card, there isn't much display wise the 570's can do the 69xx's cant at this point
.:. Obsidian 750D .:. i7 5960X .:. EVGA Titan .:. G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR4 32GB .:. CORSAIR HX850i .:. Asus X99-DELUXE .:. Crucial M4 SSD 512GB .:.
What they did is massively improve the back end of the design ,all on 40nm.Now all they will do is use 28nm to scale up SP count,IMO big time. I can see 2xVLIW4 we have in Cayman,with 28nm version of NI. They are already awfully close to 580GTX with Cayman XT,especially in high resolution new DX11/tessellation heavy games. If AMD and NV effectively double the compute power with next gens,we may have a deja vu next year:AMD having 5-10% less performance with 36-40% smaller die- a clear design efficiency advantage at the same node.
"AMD Antilles DUAL GPU info (or rumor) thread- NO FANBOYS ALLOWED![]()
Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?
If i am not mistaken at 28nm will be Keplar, new arch. If AMD keeps same arch just doubles shaders it might be different ball game vs Keplar.
![]()
.:. Obsidian 750D .:. i7 5960X .:. EVGA Titan .:. G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR4 32GB .:. CORSAIR HX850i .:. Asus X99-DELUXE .:. Crucial M4 SSD 512GB .:.
6970 because of Bitstreaming audio.
Intel i7 3770K @ 4.5ghz
Asus P8Z77-V
8GB Crucial 1866Mhz CL9
AMD Sapphire Radeon HD 6970
Crucial RealSSD M4 128GB
2x WD Raptor X
Enermax Galaxy 1000W DXX
NEC LCD2690WUXi
Yamaha RX-V667 Receiver
Monitor Audio Vector 5.1
Bookmarks