Don’t count the SPs 320 vs 384
Count the shaders or the SIMDs 20 vs 24
And yes ROPs (render Back Ends) will be 2x the performance of Cypress
Intel Core i7 920@4GHz, ASUS GENE II, 3 x 4GB DDR-3 1333MHz Kingston, 2x ASUS HD6950 1G CU II, Intel SSD 320 120GB, Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit, DELL 2311HM
AMD FX8150 vs Intel 2500K, 1080p DX-11 gaming evaluation.
If 1536 shaders is true, then...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHS-fOaO87w
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb
If last rumors are true, Nvidia will sell a lot of GTX570![]()
Had someone over on OCUK forums saying 6900 is fantastic, for the price. So looks like AMD are still keeping their strategy. I don't mind too much tbh; i'd rather have the low prices, than the 'new r300' but expensive.
Looks like it's going to be a 6950 for me then, GTX 570 a bit too expensive atm.
And i can easily see how 1920 SP's could get thrown in, as generics_user said.
Last edited by Oztopher; 12-09-2010 at 04:30 PM.
-
Core i7 860 @ 3.80GHz, 1.28v | GA-P55A-UD4 | G.Skill Ripjaw 4GB DDR3 @ 1900MHz 7-9-8-24 1N, 1.57v | HIS HD 6950 2GB, 1536sp @ 900/1400, 1.10v | Samsung F3 500GB | Thermaltake 750W | Windows 7 64bit | Air
Crunching away...
~20 % increase in shader power(minus the small inefficiency in rare cases of high ILP), "double the functionality" of ROPs. Doesn't sound that bad. However 50 % increase in shader power would've been way better. But guess AMD knows better.![]()
if 1536 sp is true, then a cheap 5870 will be better choice than a 6970 for boinc users like me.. mw, collatz and dnetc is already a lot faster with vliw5 sp mArch..
Man from Atlantis(B3D, DH, S|A, 3DC, OCN), MfA(G3D, CH), kaktus1907(XS,TPU,AT) and zennino
SIS 6326 > Ti 4200 > 9800XT > 9800GT > GTX 460
Celeron 366 > Celeron 1700 > Athlon XP 2500+ > E6300 > Q9650
Alice Madness Returns | Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood | Assassin's Creed: Revelations | Batman Arkham City | Battlefield 3 | Bulletstorm | Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 | Crysis 2 | Darkness II | Darksiders | Dead Island | Dead Space | Dead Space 2 | Deus Ex: Human Revolution | Dragon Age Origins | Dragon Age 2 | F.3.A.R. | F1 2011 | Half Life 2 | Hard Reset | Kane & Lynch 2 | L.A. Noire | LEGO: Pirates of the Caribbean | LEGO: Star Wars III: The Clone Wars | LOTR: War in the North | Mass Effect | Mass Effect 2 | Mass Effect 3 | Mini Ninjas | NFS Hot Pursuit | RAGE | Renegade Ops | Skyrim | The Witcher 2 | Tomb Raider: Underworld | Transformers: WFC | Trine 2
I have to say, no idea anymore what to expect from Cayman. In otherhand it is clear fact that Cypress was highly inefficient design, remember double shaders but only ~60% more performance compared to HD4870 (if memory serves, feel free to correct if wrong]. Same happened on HD4870 vs HD3870, performance increase was not straight up comparable to shader increase. Basically that leavesload of room to improve. I would say +40% to Cypress if they can find all bottlenecks and figure how to remove them. I believe it can then "trade blows" with GTX580. That would leave room for Cayman Pro at +10-20% over Cypress. But there is lots of if's in that.
Regarding complaints about die size, power, and shader counts: Remember that this ASIC was never supposed to exist on 40nm. They're just doing the best they can to deal with the target process having become unavailable.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Unless HD6970 performs quite close to GTX 580 for that amount of money (450-450$), it is better (performance/ price) to get 2xHD6850 and enjoy performance level of the last
BTW here is a short teaser
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tuYck...layer_embedded
Last edited by SpuTnicK; 12-09-2010 at 02:52 PM.
An unfortunate person is one tries to fart but sh1ts instead...
My Water Cooling Case Build (closed)
Primary Box WC ^ Secondary Box Air
supermicro sc750 FT ^ Spiral Galaxies
fans see below for WC ^ 2x120mm Zalman
Asus A8N32 deluxe ^ Asus A8N Premium
Opteron 165 @2385 Maze 4 ^ AMD X2 3800+ @2300 Sonic tower
Geil 2x1gb 2-2-2-5 ^ Geil 2x1gb 2-2-2-5
ECS 8800GT 725x1749x1050 ^ nVidia 7300GS
PSU Fortron BSII500w ^ PSU Fortron GLX600w
The WC system is fairly typical, DD blocks x2 CPU-GPU, D-tek procore 1x120panaflo H1A fan and shroud, Eheim 1250 pump, 1/2" tygon, 1/2ht bay res, 1x80 Panaflo L1 fan
Man from Atlantis(B3D, DH, S|A, 3DC, OCN), MfA(G3D, CH), kaktus1907(XS,TPU,AT) and zennino
SIS 6326 > Ti 4200 > 9800XT > 9800GT > GTX 460
Celeron 366 > Celeron 1700 > Athlon XP 2500+ > E6300 > Q9650
Alice Madness Returns | Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood | Assassin's Creed: Revelations | Batman Arkham City | Battlefield 3 | Bulletstorm | Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 | Crysis 2 | Darkness II | Darksiders | Dead Island | Dead Space | Dead Space 2 | Deus Ex: Human Revolution | Dragon Age Origins | Dragon Age 2 | F.3.A.R. | F1 2011 | Half Life 2 | Hard Reset | Kane & Lynch 2 | L.A. Noire | LEGO: Pirates of the Caribbean | LEGO: Star Wars III: The Clone Wars | LOTR: War in the North | Mass Effect | Mass Effect 2 | Mass Effect 3 | Mini Ninjas | NFS Hot Pursuit | RAGE | Renegade Ops | Skyrim | The Witcher 2 | Tomb Raider: Underworld | Transformers: WFC | Trine 2
Can we end the "slower than nvidia" speculation please? I have no reason not to trust this guy, and no I'm not trying advertise his site.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/sho...&postcount=707
Price is about the same as nvidia counterparts![]()
Last edited by jvc; 12-09-2010 at 05:12 PM.
From that:
Can't wait! 5 freakin daysHi there
All I can say is they are bloody fast.
For the money I am amazed.
I can see this launch being hugely sucessul for ATI, easily on par with 58xx series but better because I literally have enough stock to prevent running out which will also mean our pricing will be excellent and I should be able to keep the price low low, no price hikes.
Last edited by zalbard; 12-09-2010 at 05:24 PM.
I hope so. It would be great to see a well done launch (without shortages/price gouging), they are not as common as they should be.I can see this launch being hugely sucessul for ATI, easily on par with 58xx series but better because I literally have enough stock to prevent running out which will also mean our pricing will be excellent and I should be able to keep the price low low, no price hikes.
the US government should learn a trick or two from AMD on how to keep stuff secret..
maybe breaking their nda means a fate worse than death and listening to Justin Bieber ?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
TJ07BW | i7 980x | Asus RIII | 12Gb Corsair Dominator | 2xSapphire 7950 vapor-x | WD640Gb / SG1.5TB | Corsair HX1000W | 360mm TFC Rad + Swiftech GTZ + MCP655 | Dell U2711
I think AMD listened a bit from Nintendo. No one in hell can leak any Nintendo future consoles data (remember revolution specs or the "what kind of controller it will have").
Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
| Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"
Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)
Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
Reality check
Bookmarks