GTX580:X1748
GTX 460:X923
GTS 450:604
HD5750:602
HD5770:722
HD5830:X845
HD5870:X1234
HD5870CF:X2350
HD6850:X899
HD6870:X1120
HD6970:X1807
Assuming all this is real then 6970 is faster then ->
HD5870= 46%
HD6870= 61%
GTX580= 3%
GTX580:X1748
GTX 460:X923
GTS 450:604
HD5750:602
HD5770:722
HD5830:X845
HD5870:X1234
HD5870CF:X2350
HD6850:X899
HD6870:X1120
HD6970:X1807
Assuming all this is real then 6970 is faster then ->
HD5870= 46%
HD6870= 61%
GTX580= 3%
.:. Obsidian 750D .:. i7 5960X .:. EVGA Titan .:. G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR4 32GB .:. CORSAIR HX850i .:. Asus X99-DELUXE .:. Crucial M4 SSD 512GB .:.
Argh my blood is frickin boiling every time I see stupid demo-benchmarks like 3DMark getting hyped, even though it is proven over and over that they do not correlate to the relative performance of real games! All this does is that driver developer resources are wasted which would be spent on the actual games!
WHAT IN HELL IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE!?!![]()
Well I find it "overtly rude and mean-spirited" to continue to hype fancyDemoBenchmarks even though it is well known that this is hurting the industry!
A valid comparison with 3DMark (&LN2 cooling etc.) would be to achieve maximum RPMs in the idle gear of a car that is made to have fun driving with.
--Katzenschleuder with a professional habit
Well too bad that it is a prime example that a bling bling demo-benchmark has nothing to do with game performance:
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/g...3dmark_vantage
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/s...itt_benchmarks
The magnitudes are different, representing the great difference in the type of rendered scenes, but the ranking between nvidia and ATI cards is just about right, indicating similar shader efficiency between the game and benchmark. Also the tests were run with different driver versions. I experienced a significant variation in performance between every driver I tried around that time. Try again.
how is that a valid comparison, there is no idle gear, and RPM is nothing like maxing out framerates. a better comparison is maxing out horsepower while never taking it on a road, which is the exact function of a 1/4 mile race car.
i think you can calm down a little with the dislike for futuremarks hard work, and the hard work people put in trying to max out their hardware.
2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case
2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case
Yup 3Dmark is not representative of real gaming, that's common knowledge. Yup a rig that can run at world record speeds under extreme cooling (DICE/LN2) has no practical use. I don't think that there is an overclocker here that wouldn't agree. However, this is XtremeSystems not practical systems.
I don't have enough time, resource or indeed the inclination/dedication required to push a CPU over 7Ghz or make a rig score a WR in some version of 3D mark. Still, I am impressed with the skill, knowledge and patience required to do such things.
Respect to those that do, for what they do, and thanks to them for making me think wow, awesome.
Fun Box: Asus P8Z68-V GEN3++Corsair AX850++i5 2500k@4.5Ghz-1.272v++Corsair A50++2x8Gb Corsair Vengeance++MSI R7970 Lightning++Audigy2 Plat-EX++TBS 6280 DVB-T2 tuner++256Gb OCZ Vertex 4.500Gb Caviar Black.500Gb Seagate Barracuda++Sony AD7240s++Lian-Li PC-60++Linux Mint/Win 7++Asus P238Q
Work Box: Gigabyte H61MA-DV3++Corsair HX620++i5 3450@stock++2x8Gb Corsair Vengeance++120Gb OCZ Agility 3++Linux Mint
Quantum theory in a nutshell: It's so small we don't know where it is, it could be here, it could be there.
Just 'cos it's legal don't make it right.
I would agree Shattered Horizon is really fun and different and what do you know requires thinking and some skill to play unlike and game starting with COD.
however it would be way better if there were north american servers with more then 3 people in them... there has been a few time were out of all the servers me and buddy of mine were the only people online...
CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
Case: Modded 700D
PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's
Yeah, a truly unique game. And one that would be perfect to push these new 580 and Cayman cards. But for whatever reason it never took off. Very sad because it pretty much addressed nearly every "pc gamer" complaint - "games are dumbed down for consoles" "We don't need new cards if games don't fully utilize them" "it should be about skill" "Companies aren't responsive to the community" "Games are too expensive" "Everything is just a remake/copy of some other game" Etc.
Bookmarks