Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 48 of 48

Thread: Geforce GTX 570 comes soon

  1. #26
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    480 shaders? GTX480 with a few 'tweaks' = GTX570? Amusing to say the least...
    I hope the power consumption is finally in control.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  2. #27
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,592
    ^ the 580 is much better, no reason a 1/5th or whatever 580 wouldn't be

  3. #28
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Hollywierd, CA
    Posts
    1,284
    Quote Originally Posted by xdan View Post
    I expect to have a TDP of 225W, clocked at 700Mhz...
    It would have even lower temperature than GTX 580.
    So we will have GTX 480 performance at lower power consumption and heat.
    And may be even higher frecuencys in overclocking...950-970Mhz.
    Price i expect to be 369-399$.
    Next would be GTX 560, 384SP, based on GF104, at 300$.
    you can expect lower overclocking headroom for the entire GTX5xx series.

    Semiconductors are a near-perfect power-to-heat conversion device, so a lot of work goes in to getting as much work done with as little power as necessary. This is compounded by the fact that dynamic power (which does useful work) only represents some of the power used – the rest of the power is wasted as leakage power. In the case of a high-end GPU NVIDIA doesn’t necessarily want to reduce dynamic power usage and have it impact performance, instead they want to go after leakage power. This in turn is compounded by the fact that leaky transistors and high clocks are strange bedfellows, making it difficult to separate the two. The result is that leaky transistors are high-clocking transistors, and vice versa.
    Anandtech

    the major complaint for gf100 is the high power consuption and high heat output, this is a direct result of leaking transistors and large channels which also provide the overclocking headroom (think AMD TWKR). becuase nvidia have spent the last year reducing leaking and refining the manufacturing process, we will have cooler more efficint processors that don't overclock as far. it's another trade off that is made clear when comparing AMD and nvidia gpu's, just like die size.

    as far as the GTX570 is concerned, i'm always happy to see an increase in performance and a reduction in price!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    I am an artist (EDM producer/DJ), pls check out mah stuff.

  4. #29
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    nVidia is not going to realse this to fight it's own GTX580, GTX480 etc. Comparing GTX570 with those cards wil only lead to confusions. This card seams to be preperations to have something to drop on AMD's next move.

    The big question is, is this GTX570 meant to drop on 6970? It seams to be the case, but then it means mVidia has some bad news about 6970-performance.

    This timing is indicating it's meant to fight 6970, but we have to wait and see.

    EDITED.
    Last edited by Sam_oslo; 11-11-2010 at 05:30 PM.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  5. #30
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    1,940
    460 and down are going to be renamed to fill the void down there (just like with the 2xx series),i hope that they push prices down instead of up when renaming the 460 to 560

    570 at 480 speed and a fully equipped GF110 as 560, the current 460 down to 450 and 450 as the new 440 would give nv a decent new lineup (GF110 is too big compared to its current competitior, they really need to release a versiom with all SPs to move it above the 68xx series)
    Core i7 2600k|HD 6950|8GB RipJawsX|2x 128gb Samsung SSD 830 Raid0|Asus Sabertooth P67
    Seasonic X-560|Corsair 650D|2x WD Red 3TB Raid1|WD Green 3TB|Asus Xonar Essence STX


    Core i3 2100|HD 7770|8GB RipJawsX|128gb Samsung SSD 830|Asrock Z77 Pro4-M
    Bequiet! E9 400W|Fractal Design Arc Mini|3x Hitachi 7k1000.C|Asus Xonar DX


    Dell Latitude E6410|Core i7 620m|8gb DDR3|WXGA+ Screen|Nvidia Quadro NVS3100
    256gb Samsung PB22-J|Intel Wireless 6300|Sierra Aircard MC8781|WD Scorpio Blue 1TB


    Harman Kardon HK1200|Vienna Acoustics Brandnew|AKG K240 Monitor 600ohm|Sony CDP 228ESD

  6. #31
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Hollywierd, CA
    Posts
    1,284
    Quote Originally Posted by generics_user View Post
    460 and down are going to be renamed to fill the void down there (just like with the 2xx series),i hope that they push prices down instead of up when renaming the 460 to 560

    570 at 480 speed and a fully equipped GF110 as 560, the current 460 down to 450 and 450 as the new 440 would give nv a decent new lineup (GF110 is too big compared to its current competitior, they really need to release a versiom with all SPs to move it above the 68xx series)
    wtf are you talking about?!?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    I am an artist (EDM producer/DJ), pls check out mah stuff.

  7. #32
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    HD0
    Posts
    2,646
    reminds me of the 2900XT to 3800 transition...

  8. #33
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,462
    Quote Originally Posted by blindbox View Post
    Most probably, except for GTX460.
    They could "reuse" GF104 to fill the 500-lineup Sounds plausible to me.
    Notice any grammar or spelling mistakes? Feel free to correct me! Thanks

  9. #34
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    India
    Posts
    394
    Hmm say 570 is 700mhz 220w tdp, drop that to 600mhz 150w tdp and make a dualie

  10. #35
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Quote Originally Posted by FischOderAal View Post
    They could "reuse" GF104 to fill the 500-lineup Sounds plausible to me.
    Most likely:

    GF114 aka full GF104 as GTX 560
    Current GTX 460 as GTS 500 or 550
    And the 768 and further cut down cores as 550 or 450/400

  11. #36
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,462
    Quote Originally Posted by zerazax View Post
    Most likely:

    GF114 aka full GF104 as GTX 560
    Current GTX 460 as GTS 500 or 550
    And the 768 and further cut down cores as 550 or 450/400
    I agree with you

    Quote Originally Posted by FischOderAal View Post
    Maybe a full GF104 as a GTX560 and the GTX460 will be GT540 or something like that.

    We have no news about any chip below GF104, do we? NVIDIA has to fill the Geforce 500 lineup with something
    Notice any grammar or spelling mistakes? Feel free to correct me! Thanks

  12. #37
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Elche, Spain
    Posts
    43
    Nvidia is improving cost production and power comsumption in all their 400 series GPU range.

    GF 100 -> GF 110 will be the same imprvement as GF104 -> GF 114, changing the 40 nm process to another more efficient and cheap.

    In addition to this, nVidia is awaiting that AMD customers take knowledge about the AMD 3D tech fiasco due 3rd party drivers.
    Asrock z97 Extreme 9 | i5 4690K @ 4.2 AIR | Noctua NH-d15 |
    G.Skill Trident X 2.400GHz | NVIDIA Gigabyte 970 Gaming G1 | Samsung EVO 960
    SAMSUNG 22" 226B | Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum |

  13. #38
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Australia / Europe
    Posts
    1,310
    Quote Originally Posted by 570091D View Post
    wtf are you talking about?!?
    LOl i'm still trying to decipher... humm I think he's referring to some kind of spaceship or something of sorts

  14. #39
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    For a "GTX560", it's really easy. GF104 is an half GF100 with increased SP counts/SM ( 48vs32), and there's 8 TU by SM vs 4 for the GF100..
    ( GF104 have too 1 SM disable )
    Take the GF110 refresh and do a GF114 the same way is made the GF104.. (48SP/SM ) ...

    Question remain what can be the performance of this one vs an overlclocked GTX460 1gb... there's a ton of models around who are ultra overclocked version... If they put 775-800mhz on base models,
    i m not sure it will really shine vs a gigaybte GTX460 SOC ( stock 815mhz )..

    Then how much can be the gain with less SP counts on a GTX560 versions. The optimisation of the architecture give only 5% more perfs on the GTX580, 10% is the clock core/memory speed. ( outside heat and TDP ofc )
    ( I take this numbers on Alien, and Nvnews review who i believe have take it on the Nvidia slides. )

    I know they will ofc replace actual GTX4xx... but i think reviews will look funny if they test the GTX460,560,470,570,480,580 in the same reviews specially with Overclocked GTX4xx version
    Last edited by Lanek; 11-14-2010 at 02:21 PM.
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  15. #40
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Rotterdam
    Posts
    1,553
    Quote Originally Posted by PatRaceTin View Post
    Will NVIDIA fade out 400 series soon?
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    nVidia is not going to realse this to fight it's own GTX580, GTX480 etc. Comparing GTX570 with those cards wil only lead to confusions. This card seams to be preperations to have something to drop on AMD's next move.

    The big question is, is this GTX570 meant to drop on 6970? It seams to be the case, but then it means mVidia has some bad news about 6970-performance.

    This timing is indicating it's meant to fight 6970, but we have to wait and see.

    EDITED.
    Nothing to do with AMDs products. Bringing the 570 means eol 470 and 480 and a respective 100$ markup on both new cards.
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
    Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
    i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
    Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
    Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb

  16. #41
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,554
    Quote Originally Posted by Dimitriman View Post
    Nothing to do with AMDs products. Bringing the 570 means eol 470 and 480 and a respective 100$ markup on both new cards.
    and they're going to use what to compete with 6870?

  17. #42
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    460 is the coolest best price : performance card out right now, I don't see how Nvidia would put out both a 560 and 565 what would be the point in that I think I'm missing something
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  18. #43
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Rotterdam
    Posts
    1,553
    Quote Originally Posted by BababooeyHTJ View Post
    and they're going to use what to compete with 6870?
    That is not my point.
    My point is the gtx570 will be almost identical to the gtx480 meaning the only reason it is being re-released is to reposition it as a 350-400$ segment and to eol the 480 series. Now the 480 is the new 570 at 400$ and the 580 is at 500$. A decent mark up from the 400 series. Nvidia didnt have to move a finger to compete with the 6950 as the gtx480 was just fine for that, but as a 570 they can cash in the 500 series brand value.
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
    Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
    i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
    Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
    Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb

  19. #44
    Devil kept pokin'
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    South Kakalaky
    Posts
    1,299
    Quote Originally Posted by Dimitriman View Post
    That is not my point.
    My point is the gtx570 will be almost identical to the gtx480 meaning the only reason it is being re-released is to reposition it as a 350-400$ segment and to eol the 480 series. Now the 480 is the new 570 at 400$ and the 580 is at 500$. A decent mark up from the 400 series. Nvidia didnt have to move a finger to compete with the 6950 as the gtx480 was just fine for that, but as a 570 they can cash in the 500 series brand value.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	zing.png 
Views:	364 
Size:	17.4 KB 
ID:	109507  

  20. #45
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,554
    Quote Originally Posted by Dimitriman View Post
    Bringing the 570 means eol 470
    Quote Originally Posted by Dimitriman View Post
    That is not my point.
    My point is the gtx570 will be almost identical to the gtx480 meaning the only reason it is being re-released is to reposition it as a 350-400$ segment and to eol the 480 series. Now the 480 is the new 570 at 400$ and the 580 is at 500$. A decent mark up from the 400 series. Nvidia didnt have to move a finger to compete with the 6950 as the gtx480 was just fine for that, but as a 570 they can cash in the 500 series brand value.
    What are they going to use to compete at the $400-$200 price point? Thats a pretty big gap that AMD is doing a really good job filling.

    My point is that I don't think that 570 will do anything to 470. You are comparing cards for two different segments. They need a replacement in that segment if/when 470 goes eol.

    Most of their money is not made on these ultra enthusiast (expensive) cards.

  21. #46
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Rotterdam
    Posts
    1,553
    sure I think they should release a gtx 560 for that segment as well. it will come.
    Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
    G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
    Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
    i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
    Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
    Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb

  22. #47
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,554
    Quote Originally Posted by Dimitriman View Post
    sure I think they should release a gtx 560 for that segment as well. it will come.
    and leave what is probably a more important segment unfilled in the meantime?

  23. #48
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Lima, Peru
    Posts
    600
    Quote Originally Posted by Glow9 View Post
    460 is the coolest best price : performance card out right now, I don't see how Nvidia would put out both a 560 and 565 what would be the point in that I think I'm missing something
    Because HD6850 holds that title(with ease). Cheaper, a bit faster, very similar in OC, better multigpu performance(the best scaling out there, 82-85%~)way less power consumption (hd6850 127w furmark, less in typical gaming vs 460 160w typical gaming or 190w in furmark).

    http://www.bit-tech.net/blog/2010/11...p-mean-nvidia/

    460 got replaced in bang for buck but not by another nvidia card...
    Last edited by Nintendork; 11-14-2010 at 07:26 PM.
    Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
    | Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"

    Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
    Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)

    Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
    Reality check

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •