Funny thing is that you can't put Barts efficiency gains on increase in ROP. here is what AT said in its review:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/3987/a...range-market/2it’s worth noting that internally AMD was throwing around 2 designs for Barts: a 16 SIMD (1280 SP) 16 ROP design, and a 14 SIMD (1120 SP) 32 ROP design that they ultimately went with. The 14/32 design was faster, but only by 2%. This along with the ease of porting the design from Cypress made it the right choice for AMD, but it also means that Cypress/Barts is not exclusively bound on the shader/texture side or the ROP/raster side.




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks