The above, in part simply states that "quality" is not the same as AI standard. But wait there's more to it:After all, unlike back then thought of us is the "Quality Setting", which is the default driver on a Radeon HD 6800 is not equal to Catalyst AI standard - but worse!
ShockerA small all-clear we can give the sense that the controller "high quality" the quality of the anisotropic filter is returned to the level of Catalyst AI standard.. So in part, what it's saying is that in order to get what you were getting before in AF you have to set it to HQ
. This makes the OP/Subject of the OP misleading. The article does not discuss the merits of any fix but the settings found in CCC in regards to AF. As there is no mention of any engineering or other technical specifications.
Also, I take the article with a pinch of salt. Why? Because the article is using very old games to show AF quality with. Which draws the question of why they aren't using more current games to show AF for? I see no reason why AF is only examined in games that go as far back as November 16, 2004. Or is that November 2003 (Trackmania)
By no means do I advocate for AMD. If there is a problem let us examine it. However, per this article I'm not finding anything note worthy as posted in the OP and subject of this thread.



. So in part, what it's saying is that in order to get what you were getting before in AF you have to set it to HQ
. This makes the OP/Subject of the OP misleading. The article does not discuss the merits of any fix but the settings found in CCC in regards to AF. As there is no mention of any engineering or other technical specifications. 
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks