Results 1 to 25 of 1028

Thread: AMD Radeon HD 6870 and HD 6850 confirmed to be launched on 22.10.2010

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Quote Originally Posted by Xoulz View Post
    lulz..

    The 5850 is EOL dude.. just like the 4870..

    Secondly, as most here have suggested, the Barts is a less expensive price point than the Cypress. We don't know the exact details, but how does any of your remedial mathematics of pseudo facts, prove anything? What is your base?

    Lastly, how does any of this bolster your over-all point, that the GTX 460 is a better buy?
    First of all, what is your source as for the 5850 being EOL?

    Secondly, tell me how you know that Barts 6800 series cards will be cheaper than Cypress. As far as I've seen, pricing will be from the $175 to $250-260 range for either Barts PRO and Barts XT.

    "...remedial mathematics of pseudo facts"...assuming you mean remedial in such a way that I would dumb it down for slow learners, such as retards? pseudo as in false?
    What part of my facts are false, or pretended? Everything I listed has been said before within AMD, and has also obviously been released to the public. I even threw in numbers for overclocked cards. I simply stated that there has been confusion about Barts and it's performance figures. Obviously parts and peices were cut down considerably as time went along.

    Elaborate on your claims.

    Lastly, I said that the GTX460 was a better buy than the HD5850 at the moment, due to it being $50 cheaper and having much better tesselation performance. I did not stress this as something important, nor was it ever my over all point.


    Troll

    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    The problem is not when when they bring 5870 level performance down to 259 dollars, it when they bring 5850 level performance again at 259 dollars. I have a hard time believing that a 960 shader card will compete with a 1600 shader card that is 50% bigger at similar clocks. In addition the leak vantage number seem very believable with a 960 shader part.
    Oh my god, common sense. :O
    Last edited by BeepBeep2; 10-15-2010 at 11:58 AM.
    Smile

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •