Real Temp - New temp program for Intel Core processors

[rge]

I just noticed that comment in the post of Ehume :

"At idle, Tmonitor64 thinks it is going at 9x, Real Temp GT thinks the multi is 18.5x and CPU-Z thinks it is 30x. Note that the voltages in ET6 and CPU-Z are below 1v, more in line with a multi of 9x than anything else"

That is all that matters for me.

Of course I admit that CPU-Z is not accurate anymore at idle on latest Intel generations, that is why TMonitor was developped.

That discussion is closed for me, I want everything but a never ending topic about what is the best method to read clock speed. There are as many methods as there are tools to read them.

Great, now that your here, can you explain how Tmonitor works, because it clearly isnt for reporting mhz. So what is it for?

CPU is at 4.2ghz, EIST, all speedstep/C states are OFF. So should always read 4.2ghz, reading directly from msr always reads multi correct.

pic 1: Tmonitor at idle, not even close to correct mhz.
pics 2 and 3: Tmonitor not even close to correct mhz, and according to intel all active cores are at same frequency, yet tmonitor is showing 3 different frequencies, and none are correct....

so if you can explain the purpose of tmonitor Im all ears...It is like some bizarre merger of load and mhz the purpose of which is???