Quote Originally Posted by unclewebb View Post
RealTemp 3.60
ehume: I tested TMonitor a long time ago and all I can say is don't believe what it tells you. It does not follow the Intel recommended method as clearly outlined in their November 2008 Turbo White Paper which rge shared with me a long time ago. RealTemp has been following the correct method ever since then.

rge also did some testing of TMonitor and he wasn't happy either. I try to avoid commenting on the competition but in this case I don't mind to because TMonitor is clearly wrong. So is CPU-Z at idle but a high multiplier makes for a better screen shot at idle so I can understand why CPU-Z does what it does. No one would be happy if they went to do a validation and the true multiplier was displayed.
hum hum, you don't know how TMonitor works, do you ?
So how can you tell that it is wrong
As a manner of fact, TMonitor is closer to real clocks than CPU-Z is.

Besides, you can understand why CPU-Z does what it does ... I was a bit worrying about your opinion on that subject, what a relief

Anyway ...