Quote Originally Posted by Florinmocanu View Post
But the GPU is not on Die, it's quite important to say that.

Ontario's TDP is CPU + GPU, while Atom is only CPU. So while Ontario is 9W, its CPU + GPU = 9W. While Atom is CPU only.

Let me know the combined TDP of ATOM N550 + integrated GPU from intel and it's level of perf/wat, i cannot find such an info yet.
Reading comprehension problems ?

N550 - 8.5W, 1.50 GHz, dual core, GPU
N475 - 6.5W, 1.83 GHz, single core, GPU
N450 - 5.5W, 1.66 GHz, single core, GPU


Let me repeat : you're stuck in 2008. We are in 2010. Today's Atom that your find all over the place ( cast a look emag ) integrates on the same die, the CPU+GPU+NB. Clear ?

So total power for the T40N would be 9+6w=15w ( SB ) while for the N550 it would be 8.5+2=10.5w

30% less power at platform level which with the same battery and screen would translate into 30% more endurance. Using the other N models only increases this advantage.

Current Atom : everything on a single die.



Quote Originally Posted by -Boris- View Post
And they shall compete with this one.
T40N - 9W, 1.0 GHz, dual core, GPU, LVDDR3

And the only thing we now about the power draw of T40N is that it's theoretical maximum power draw is somewhere between 5W and 9W.

Saying that it's typical power draw is at 9W is BS, and maximum power draw at 9W is absolute worst case scenario.
You do understand that what you're saying equally applies to Atom chips also ?