AMD Ontario APU pictured,die size ~77mm^2

[LightSpeed]

Because I can. And my prediction is up to 50% faster clock per clock. What's yours so we can revisit this in 4 months and see who was right ?

You want mine? 70%. Im not here to see who was right or wrong in 4 months, might be you or me or neither of us, we'll know that in time. However, let me paste the case you pointed out again:

Dual cores
Bobcat: T40N - 9W, 1.0 GHz, dual core, GPU, LVDDR3
vs.
Atom: N550 - 8.5W, 1.50 GHz, dual core, GPU

Evenly matched performance wise and power wise, GPU favours Ontario

So over here, the TDP is the same, performance is the same (by your predictions), and Bobcat has a much faster GPU. Clean win I would say, atleast in this case?
So is AMD superior to Intel in this occasion ? Or are you having a hard time admitting it? Or are you gonna say we cant predict the performance of Bobcat's GPU, the Atom's might be superior? You also completely ignored by next paragraph, let me paste it again for you:

Also, its apparent that the disabled cores and GPU's are sucking power, or they are just worse binned with higher voltages. See the single core Bobcat: 1.5Ghz 18W. Dual core without GPU: 1.4Ghz 18W. Makes no sense when there is a 1.6ghz Bobcat + GPU for 18W.

Hence, while its perfectly OK to compare those SOC's mentioned above as well since they are a part of the lineup, the dualies with GPU seem to have much superior perf/watt and lets see what they consume at 800Mhz. Should be lower than 9W