AMD Ontario APU pictured,die size ~77mm^2

[RaV[666]]

Yeah, the Atom killer ended squarely in the 9-20w range, just where single and dual core SB will be.

At a different die size and different price and with most probably better IGP (for sure on the software side)

One even asked "where is the Llano delay, AMD said it was planned for 2011 ?"...
No wonder why the human specie is in danger. Most have their gray cells in permanent C6 state.

It was, it was meant to be available in Q1 2011.Shipping end of Q4 2010(and thats what we know is pushed back)

Since parts are power gated, no they shouldn't be using any power.
Did you happen to have heard by any chance of the concept of having different CPU bins ?
You see, not all parts have the same power characteristics. You have parts which are leakier and more power hungry. Instead of tossing them away, you put them in another TDP range. That's why some single cores will burn a lot of power, but instead of being discarded they are sold at a discount in a higher TDP range.

The eOntario roadmap isnt official one, it could very well be that there will be scrap parts destined for VERY low niche markets (better to sell broken chip for low $ than to scrap it).It IS NOT however official ontario roadmap.

Atom isnt in the too many (any?) handhelds too, bobcat from a consumer standpoint is targeted at nettops/netbooks/tablets, which it fits perfectly, with better performance than atom(most probably MUCH better)

So, we have the slide which says "sub 1w capable". Too bad they forgot to show that slide to the design team. Maybe, then, they would have made it in-order.

Thats exactly kind of comment that goes in the troll bin.This slide is about one bobcat core without GPU.We dont have such a product in the most imminent lineup, it doesnt mean it isnt possible tho.Amd does not have money for many different dies.What was the point of such comment ?