Results 1 to 25 of 344

Thread: Intel plans to deliberately limit Sandy Bridge overclocking

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    Quote Originally Posted by Solus Corvus View Post
    Wrong. It varies but many vehicles can be upgraded in performance for free. Depending on what type you could drill the jets, flash the eprom, take out extra weight, install a bleed in the wastegate pressure line, take off the mufflers, port and polish the manifolds/heads, etc etc.

    I swear, computer people shouldn't delve into car analogies unless they have a clue.
    Riiiiiiiiiiight, because the number of people who can hit numbers into a BIOS to OC is the same as those who are willing to mechanically delve into their car. The barrier to old style OCing like replacing clock chips by soldering is the same as popping open your hood: screw up and you've got an expensive paperweight.

    We've been spoiled by FSB / bclock OC. It's as if you could pop open a hidden instrument panel to unlock extra HP.

    @ Dr.Who: thanks for the kind words. I personally don't have a problem if OC is restricted, but it's nice to see you guys still into the 'hidden value'.
    Last edited by cegras; 09-08-2010 at 09:00 PM.
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •