How is it immature? It was a legitimate question because until your most recent post you were not making any sense at all.

After your most recent post I don't see any disagreement between us at all. Before it sounded like you were saying this was not a problem and Intel should not be responsible for replacing chips that the end user fried. Which is completely not the case. A user has no reason to believe disabling cores is going to fry their chip unless they read this thread. And honestly knowing this I would be wary of having spent that kind of cash and have something so simple fry it. What else could go wrong?

And I don't think anyone has been saying that this is solely Intel's responsibility. Many suggestions and hypotheses have been directed at different boards and board manufacturers.

However it is Intel's responsibility to work with the board manufacturers in solving this problem as it is their design.