Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456
Results 126 to 149 of 149

Thread: GeForce GTX 490 exists!

  1. #126
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    Seriously do you work for AMD or former ATI?

    Its seems like you like to throw rocks on the company just as much as charlie and you want them to go under.

    In another thread you were ragging on nvidia for somewhat dishonest advertising. When has AMD been really that honest in its GPU advertising lately? Every recent bar graph comparison has never started at 0 but something like .8 to make it look like a 100% improvement over the competition and also the extreme mudslinging is completely ridiculous lately.

    Your even spreading your particular brand of venom on other forums.

    "If I won the GTX480, and I won't be entering, I'll hawk it off to some idiot who wants to pay for the card and then spend the money on a SSD ... and a 5850."

    http://forums.redflagdeals.com/spons.../#post10576572

    You must really hate NV if you wouldn't even keep a free card and calling all gtx 480 owners idiots.
    Wat? If I got a 5970 I wouldn't keep it either, I already can't stand the noise a 4870 puts out on automatic fan profile. To me noise is almost 50% of the equation.

    As for mudslinging, I'm not sure I can remember any recent situation where ATI was as vocal as nvidia, especially with the whole fiasco leading up to Fermi (just read Saaya's sig for a run down of that). And as for graphs, I never really agreed with any of them from the start, but I can't recall ever commenting on bar graph scale. If you by chance happen to find one, feel free to point it out and I'll apologize.

    So did you google my name, or are you actually part of RFD? You're either a) very butthurt, or b) a Canadian. Ouch on both fronts (tongue in cheek, I'm Canadian too).



    Also, I find this whole thing hilarious because the 'ATI killer' made from the new price/perf/watt GF104 CHAMP CHIPS was supposed to be released, but it was completely aborted and instead shifted to super secret OEM sales. I'd like to give OP benefit of the doubt, but with no real proof this seems like a grass roots shilling stunt.

    And yeah, I personally think that anyone who would buy a GTX480 for gaming is making a bit of an uninformed choice. 3D is great for making you cross-eyed, and PhysX ... well, PhysX is a bonus but certainly not an incentive. From my perspective (forget about heat), the noise that thing puts out is simply unacceptable. Standard excuses of 'increase volume until gunshots reverberate inside your chest' need not apply here.



    My dear, you need to take my quote in context. At that time a GTX480 would have fetched a premium price, enough for a boot SSD + a GFX upgrade. While I clearly have stated that this generation is lackluster, I won't turn down a free upgrade with minimal noise impact. At that time, what GFX could I upgrade too with a good noise footprint? If that statement was made today, I would have changed the 5850 to "5850/GTX460." I probably would've gotten the 460 too, considering it's dead silent and admittedly much better back end support (developer and whatnot). Also I think nvidia has always had superior thermal engineering.
    Last edited by cegras; 09-07-2010 at 07:58 PM.
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

  2. #127
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    Quote Originally Posted by cegras View Post
    Wat? If I got a 5970 I wouldn't keep it either, I already can't stand the noise a 4870 puts out on automatic fan profile. To me noise is almost 50% of the equation.

    As for mudslinging, I'm not sure I can remember any recent situation where ATI was as vocal as nvidia, especially with the whole fiasco leading up to Fermi (just read Saaya's sig for a run down of that). And as for graphs, I never really agreed with any of them from the start, but I can't recall ever commenting on bar graph scale. If you by chance happen to find one, feel free to point it out and I'll apologize.

    So did you google my name, or are you actually part of RFD? You're either a) very butthurt, or b) a Canadian. Ouch on both fronts (tongue in cheek, I'm Canadian too).



    Also, I find this whole thing hilarious because the 'ATI killer' was supposed to be released, but it was completely aborted and instead shifted to super secret OEM sales. I'd like to give OP benefit of the doubt, but with no real proof this seems like a grass roots shilling stunt.

    And yeah, I personally think that anyone who would buy a GTX480 for gaming is making a bit of an uninformed choice. 3D is great for making you cross-eyed, and PhysX ... well, PhysX is a bonus but certainly not an incentive. From my perspective (forget about heat), the noise that thing puts out is simply unacceptable. Standard excuses of 'increase volume until gunshots reverberate inside your chest' need not apply here.
    If you look below my name, it should be obvious that I am Canadian and a member of redflagdeals.

    I think your being overly critical on NV and appear to like seeing them fail considering the tone of your posts. Additionally, you seem to turn a blind eye to AMD recent marketing antics which are if anything more recently, more misleading. Bargraphs that show that are manipulated so they make that they are twice as fast as the competition is very misleading and you should be critical for them for that.

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/2908/4

    http://xtreview.com/images/radeon%20...t%20tst10b.png

    http://www.dvhardware.net/news/ati_r...ance_slide.jpg

    I think we should hope that both company can succeed so we get some competition. Some of the new chiphell leaks are showing that AMD is going to price this generation of cards to their highest yet. A 5970 being out priced by the 6970. Considering that it is already a 700 dollar card, it scary to think how pricey it can get.

    But I think recently NV has become rather humble and apologetic. It hasn't been beating its chest as much as say AMD. E.g there whitepaper article at anandtech where they are talking about Fermi. When they had the small fiasco of an announcement of an announcement, they released they had made an error in marketing and apologized. A tolerance for failure comment they realized they had screwed up and are trying to fix things.

    The only thing they said in regards to Fermi speed in the past was, the 5870 is fast but not that fast in which it isn't. The problem Fermi wasn't that fast either.

    I think for the long term, if you could get them at the same price, a gtx 480 is a better card than a 5870 not so much for its directx 10 performance but its directx 11. Another benefit of Gtx 480 which is very real is they tend to do much better in the way it is meant to be played games.

    One more reason is if someone wants top performance, its probably a better value to get two gtx 480 than say two 5970, which due to bad crossfire scaling really don't perform that much better at a significantly higher cost.

    Sure it might generate some heat and use alot more power, but honestly power is cheap in canada and its damn cold here especially in saskatchewan.
    Last edited by tajoh111; 09-07-2010 at 08:16 PM.
    Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
    6gb OCZ platinum
    4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
    2*640 WD Blacks
    750GB Seagate.

  3. #128
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    I don't think I turn a blind eye. The first graph is mobility, and I have thusfar never needed a mobility part so I don't read reviews at all ... except to have a good laugh at a 100W TDP GTX480. Vendor preference or not, that's kinda giggly. But like I said, I don't think I've ever commented on bar graphs from either side, I know how to read them and without knowledge of testing conditions they're useless for anything other than a first approximation.

    As for the pricing strategy, as a 'value minded' consumer all I see is this: "my budget is ideally under 200 or around there. What can I get, and will it be worth it?" I have never really been bothered about pricing on flagships (and I don't think I've ever contradicted myself) because I simply don't care. If the card isn't worth it at my budget, I just won't buy it. Judging future pricing strategy based upon projected flagship pricing doesn't really help.

    As for heat and power, I don't really get into a knot over it. What I'm worried about is the acoustics that accompany the heat a certain power draw produces. The 4850 was fine because even at high temps that heat generated was low, the heatsink could be small and quiet. But the GTX480 simply nearly overwhelms its cooler (and goes into turbine mode). Acoustics acoustics acoustics. I would never ever use a 5970 or a GTX480, and I probably wouldn't go for a 5870 or GTX470 either.

    Midrange, where regular income people like me sit, is the pit of compromise.

    I do eagerly await the next gen, and while I might post more in nvidia threads about how they aren't cutting it, the fact that my GFX has not changed reflects that I don't think ATI is really cutting it either. ; )
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

  4. #129
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    los angeles
    Posts
    387
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    That would be too hot, too power hungry, and too expensive. That's why we didn't get a double-GPU while 470 has been out there for a while.

    I hope it is 460x2 2GB. It would be cool, quiet, power efficient, and hopefully will go for $349. In case, it will send a shock wave and tear apart all prices from top to bottom. The price is just some hope and speculations tho, but in case will make the day for us frequent consumers of GPU.
    nvidias too proud to make a high end dual gpu card that wont outperform atis high end
    expect something crazy, like maybe a 470x2 with newer revision silicon

    who cares about the heat/power consumption. high efficiency psus are all over the place, and electricity costs are really nothing with computers
    some of us prefer v8s over boosted 4/6's
    Seti@Home Optimized Apps
    Heat
    Quote Originally Posted by aNoN_ View Post
    pretty low score, why not higher? kingpin gets 40k in 3dmark05 and 33k in 06 and 32k in vantage performance...

  5. #130
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    Also tajoh, I secretly think it'd be incredibly hilarious if terrace was right about bulldozer.
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

  6. #131
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    57
    Quote Originally Posted by cegras View Post
    Hiiiilarious.
    What he said.
    P8P67Deluxe
    2500K @ 5046 MHZ
    8 GB Ripjaws
    MSI 660 TI PE

  7. #132
    Visitor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    676
    Quote Originally Posted by cegras View Post
    But the GTX480 simply nearly overwhelms its cooler (and goes into turbine mode). Acoustics acoustics acoustics. I would never ever use a 5970 or a GTX480, and I probably wouldn't go for a 5870 or GTX470 either.
    With the standard factory BIOS profile I don't find the noise of the GTX 480 worse than the 280 GTX for instance. During gaming it's not problem at all and at idle you won't hear much inside a case.

    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111
    I think for the long term, if you could get them at the same price, a gtx 480 is a better card than a 5870 not so much for its directx 10 performance but its directx 11. Another benefit of Gtx 480 which is very real is they tend to do much better in the way it is meant to be played games.
    For get about scaling. Both top-end cards are very fast and nice products. The problem ATi has is big Crossfire stutter problems in some good games. Sometimes they get fixed months later or not at all (GTA4).

  8. #133
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by cx-ray View Post
    For get about scaling. Both top-end cards are very fast and nice products. The problem ATi has is big Crossfire stutter problems in some good games. Sometimes they get fixed months later or not at all (GTA4).
    Almost as many issues as people are having with the GTX 460's and stutter in SLI or otherwise...

  9. #134
    Visitor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    676
    Quote Originally Posted by Ejizz View Post
    Almost as many issues as people are having with the GTX 460's and stutter in SLI or otherwise...
    I don't know anything about the 460 I can only speak for 280 GTX, GTX 480, and trying out the HD 5970 on the x58 platform.

  10. #135
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lancaster, UK
    Posts
    473
    Huh, I run a single 460 and have had them in SLI in the past and they were fantastic, what issue are you talking about?
    CPU: Intel 2500k (4.8ghz)
    Mobo: Asus P8P67 PRO
    GPU: HIS 6950 flashed to Asus 6970 (1000/1400) under water
    Sound: Corsair SP2500 with X-Fi
    Storage: Intel X-25M g2 160GB + 1x1TB f1
    Case: Sivlerstone Raven RV02
    PSU: Corsair HX850
    Cooling: Custom loop: EK Supreme HF, EK 6970
    Screens: BenQ XL2410T 120hz


    Help for Heroes

  11. #136
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,811
    Quote Originally Posted by Bodkin View Post
    Huh, I run a single 460 and have had them in SLI in the past and they were fantastic, what issue are you talking about?
    Watch this Video
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  12. #137
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Let's all pretend that AMD's multi-GPU setups don't microstutter as well ( ... NOT! )
    Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.

    -Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.

    Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero

  13. #138
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    Yeah, that totally justifies nvidia's problems (NOT).
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

  14. #139
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    Let's all pretend that AMD's multi-GPU setups don't microstutter as well ( ... NOT! )

  15. #140
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Quote Originally Posted by cegras View Post
    Yeah, that totally justifies nvidia's problems (NOT).
    What you guys fail to realize is that both nVIDIA & AMD don't mind microstuttering, and won't do sh1t about it either way.

    Multi-GPU setups apart from benchmarking shouldn't be used, at least not before they figure out another way to render things ( totally microstutter-free obviously )
    Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.

    -Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.

    Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero

  16. #141
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    What you guys fail to realize is that both nVIDIA & AMD don't mind microstuttering, and won't do sh1t about it either way.

    Multi-GPU setups apart from benchmarking shouldn't be used, at least not before they figure out another way to render things ( totally microstutter-free obviously )
    Lol... No one is saying only Nv micro-stutters, you are imagining that...
    Ati tried to do something about it with side port but power consumption was too much of an issue.
    As no one 'currently' has a fix, neither party can/wants to publicly acknowledge it.

  17. #142
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    Hydra : D
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

  18. #143
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Quote Originally Posted by Ejizz View Post
    Ati tried to do something about it with side port but power consumption was too much of an issue.
    Not really, you're not even close.
    And of course power consumption wasn't an issue at all.

    Here's some basic reading for you ATI's Eric Demers tech interview.

    Quote Originally Posted by cegras View Post
    Hydra : D
    AFAIK it has its own problems ( oh and its scaling sucks )
    Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.

    -Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.

    Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero

  19. #144
    Visitor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    676
    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    Multi-GPU setups apart from benchmarking shouldn't be used, at least not before they figure out another way to render things ( totally microstutter-free obviously )
    I've only experienced that type of stutter shown in the video in two games with the GTX 280 in SLI. The first was MW2 single player and second Brother's in Arms Hell's Highway. In both cases it depends on the direction you're looking in.

    With the GTX 480 the stutter was gone in MW2...didn't bother to try the other game. I don't know whether it's due to a new driver or just different hardware.

    There might be little probs with new games sometimes or with driver updates here and there. Nvidia is pretty good though with updating their driver profiles and fixing problems.

    I've gamed extensively with about 30 of the most popular titles from the past 3-4 years. Overall, SLI with the aforementioned cards work better than what I would get with a single card. Whatever the reason may be, the x58 platform made it much better than Nforce. SLI with the cards and hardware that I've used is definitely mature enough for mainstream gaming.

  20. #145
    NooB MOD
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    5,799
    Quote Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
    What you guys fail to realize is that both nVIDIA & AMD don't mind microstuttering, and won't do sh1t about it either way.

    Multi-GPU setups apart from benchmarking shouldn't be used, at least not before they figure out another way to render things ( totally microstutter-free obviously )
    Scan Line Interleave?
    Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
    Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!


    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Intel is about to get athlon'd
    Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v

  21. #146
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,692
    Quote Originally Posted by Eastcoasthandle View Post
    Watch this Video
    Whoa that was aweful for both setups! But I did think the Crossfire setup was worse with stuttering actually...hmmm.

    Intel Core i7-3770K
    ASUS P8Z77-I DELUXE
    EVGA GTX 970 SC
    Corsair 16GB (2x8GB) Vengeance LP 1600
    Corsair H80
    120GB Samsung 840 EVO, 500GB WD Scorpio Blue, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
    Corsair RM650
    Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced
    OC: 5Ghz | +0.185 offset : 1.352v

  22. #147
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    India
    Posts
    394
    Quote Originally Posted by Ejizz View Post
    Almost as many issues as people are having with the GTX 460's and stutter in SLI or otherwise...

  23. #148
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Toon
    Posts
    1,570
    Yes, 460 SLi can stutter, if it does try replacing or even removing the SLi bridge this has cured a few for me.

    Just spoke to a rep about whether the Dual GF100 or GF104 cards would see the light of day. Got a political response which I read as yes but I can't say anything.
    Intel i7 920 C0 @ 3.67GHz
    ASUS 6T Deluxe
    Powercolor 7970 @ 1050/1475
    12GB GSkill Ripjaws
    Antec 850W TruePower Quattro
    50" Full HD PDP
    Red Cosmos 1000

  24. #149
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,116
    Quote Originally Posted by initialised View Post
    Just spoke to a rep about whether the Dual GF100 or GF104 cards would see the light of day. Got a political response which I read as yes but I can't say anything.
    amd releases 3 new chips in 3 months. nvidia has no new chips. what can nvidia do?

    they have kept enough capability in reserve to release a whole new product line. they can upgrade every fermi chip and double up gf104. and by can I mean will.

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •