MMM
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 37

Thread: Lost Planet 2 Benchmark and Performance

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    514

    Lost Planet 2 Benchmark and Performance


  2. #2
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    lol, the big weird thing got like 20% fatter with DX11

    i dont really like how they used tessellation, the textures should align with the extra polygons, not just seem all random.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601


    1680X1050

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    514
    ^ ^ 1920.1080


  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    U.S of freakin' A
    Posts
    1,931
    I didn't even know this game was coming out on PC..
    Intel Core i7 6900K
    Noctua NH-D15
    Asus X99A II
    32 GB G.Skill TridentZ @ 3400 CL15 CR1
    NVidia Titan Xp
    Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5
    Sennheiser HD-598
    Samsung 960 Pro 1TB
    Western Digital Raptor 600GB
    Asus 12x Blu-Ray Burner
    Sony Optiarc 24x DVD Burner with NEC chipset
    Antec HCP-1200w Power Supply
    Viewsonic XG2703-GS
    Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
    Logitech G502 gaming mouse w/Razer Exact Mat
    Logitech G910 mechanical gaming keyboard
    Windows 8 x64 Pro

  6. #6
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    637
    Why is DX11 that much slower than DX9?! FFS, DX10 and DX11 were supposed to be faster given the lack of legacy crap!

    I see there seems to be a bit of tessellation, but still, nothing that should drop the FPS that low...
    Why wont developers start coding a decent engine...

    Also, I love how HD4xxx and GTX2xx and below are stuck with DX9 since they didn't bother adding a DX10 rendering path...

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    U.S of freakin' A
    Posts
    1,931
    Downloading now. I'll give it a spin and see how much tessellation they used. If they used a lot, that could explain why DX11 is significantly slower.

    I hope SLi works with this benchmark!
    Last edited by Carfax; 08-16-2010 at 09:19 AM.
    Intel Core i7 6900K
    Noctua NH-D15
    Asus X99A II
    32 GB G.Skill TridentZ @ 3400 CL15 CR1
    NVidia Titan Xp
    Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5
    Sennheiser HD-598
    Samsung 960 Pro 1TB
    Western Digital Raptor 600GB
    Asus 12x Blu-Ray Burner
    Sony Optiarc 24x DVD Burner with NEC chipset
    Antec HCP-1200w Power Supply
    Viewsonic XG2703-GS
    Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
    Logitech G502 gaming mouse w/Razer Exact Mat
    Logitech G910 mechanical gaming keyboard
    Windows 8 x64 Pro

  8. #8
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    can you use wireframe view with the benchmark? or some nvidia tool?

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Posts
    479
    Quote Originally Posted by Carfax View Post
    Downloading now. I'll give it a spin and see how much tessellation they used. If they used a lot, that could explain why DX11 is significantly slower.

    I hope SLi works with this benchmark!
    SLI is working, at least DX9 for sure.
    ASUS P8Z68-V PRO B3 + Intel i5-2500k @ 5.0 GHz + Noctua NH-D14
    8GB DDR3 Corsair Vengeance XMP (kit 2x 4GB) 1866MHz / Gainward Geforce GTX470 SLI watercooled
    120GB SSD Kingston HyperX (games) / 1x 30GB SSD OCZ Vertex Turbo (system)
    22" LG IPS226V-PN / PSU Fortron AURUM GOLD 700(W) / Cooler Master HAF Tower RC-932

  10. #10
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    U.S of freakin' A
    Posts
    1,931
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    can you use wireframe view with the benchmark? or some nvidia tool?
    I didn't see an option for wireframe.. The graphics were shoddy anyway. Some of the textures actually became transparent throughout the benchmark.
    Intel Core i7 6900K
    Noctua NH-D15
    Asus X99A II
    32 GB G.Skill TridentZ @ 3400 CL15 CR1
    NVidia Titan Xp
    Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5
    Sennheiser HD-598
    Samsung 960 Pro 1TB
    Western Digital Raptor 600GB
    Asus 12x Blu-Ray Burner
    Sony Optiarc 24x DVD Burner with NEC chipset
    Antec HCP-1200w Power Supply
    Viewsonic XG2703-GS
    Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
    Logitech G502 gaming mouse w/Razer Exact Mat
    Logitech G910 mechanical gaming keyboard
    Windows 8 x64 Pro

  11. #11
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    608
    Hardware:
    i7 980x @ 4ghz
    2x 5870 no overclock
    rest in my Sig

    results :
    DX9, 2560x1600 , MSAA4x , everything else on high :
    Test B : 80.8 Fps average

    DX9, 2560x1600 , no AA , everything else on high :
    Test A : 99.3 Fps average
    Test B : 91.3 Fps average

    DX9, 1920x1200 , MSAA4x , everything else on high :
    Test A : 125.8 Fps average
    Test B : 103.9 Fps average

    DX11 will not work it crashes "stopped working" after the sponsors logos !!!!
    Last edited by quattro_; 08-16-2010 at 09:58 AM.

  12. #12
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    U.S of freakin' A
    Posts
    1,931
    Quote Originally Posted by spajdr View Post
    SLI is working, at least DX9 for sure.
    Not in DX11. I just ran the benchmark and I got 40.8 average at 2560x1600 MSx4AA, everything on high including DX11 @ 850/1700/4200..

    I checked MSI afterburner afterwards and only one GPU was being fully utilized. There was a bit of activity of the second GPU, but nothing like what you'd expect with true SLi.

    Not surprising though, considering this is a new benchmark.
    Intel Core i7 6900K
    Noctua NH-D15
    Asus X99A II
    32 GB G.Skill TridentZ @ 3400 CL15 CR1
    NVidia Titan Xp
    Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5
    Sennheiser HD-598
    Samsung 960 Pro 1TB
    Western Digital Raptor 600GB
    Asus 12x Blu-Ray Burner
    Sony Optiarc 24x DVD Burner with NEC chipset
    Antec HCP-1200w Power Supply
    Viewsonic XG2703-GS
    Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
    Logitech G502 gaming mouse w/Razer Exact Mat
    Logitech G910 mechanical gaming keyboard
    Windows 8 x64 Pro

  13. #13
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,811
    The amount of tessellation used distorts the creature. Appears to me they over did it. Also, the video is a stuttery mess. The FPS doesn't seem to fit the game.
    Last edited by Eastcoasthandle; 08-16-2010 at 10:30 AM.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  14. #14
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    bakersfield ca
    Posts
    872
    A clear showing of the Fermi's faster tessellation performance. Overall looks very impressive graphically and doesnt seem to perform to bad.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    U.S of freakin' A
    Posts
    1,931
    Quote Originally Posted by brandinb View Post
    A clear showing of the Fermi's faster tessellation performance. Overall looks very impressive graphically and doesnt seem to perform to bad.
    I don't know about the graphics being very impressive. The textures seemed very dull to me, and throughout the benchmark, I noticed that they would sometimes become transparent.

    The retail edition will undoubtedly look much better though I'm sure.
    Intel Core i7 6900K
    Noctua NH-D15
    Asus X99A II
    32 GB G.Skill TridentZ @ 3400 CL15 CR1
    NVidia Titan Xp
    Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5
    Sennheiser HD-598
    Samsung 960 Pro 1TB
    Western Digital Raptor 600GB
    Asus 12x Blu-Ray Burner
    Sony Optiarc 24x DVD Burner with NEC chipset
    Antec HCP-1200w Power Supply
    Viewsonic XG2703-GS
    Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
    Logitech G502 gaming mouse w/Razer Exact Mat
    Logitech G910 mechanical gaming keyboard
    Windows 8 x64 Pro

  16. #16
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    650
    I love these over the top capcom games :p

    Is Bayonetta coming for the pc as well ?

    edit: (oh wait, capcom didn't make bayonetta but still... do want )
    Last edited by Loque; 08-16-2010 at 11:38 AM.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    TJ07BW | i7 980x | Asus RIII | 12Gb Corsair Dominator | 2xSapphire 7950 vapor-x | WD640Gb / SG1.5TB | Corsair HX1000W | 360mm TFC Rad + Swiftech GTZ + MCP655 | Dell U2711

  17. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    EU
    Posts
    318
    Are there any screenies comparing diff dxpaths +/- levels of tesselation ?
    Recent optimalizations with games are becoming pretty crap...
    Metro looks mediocre and works worse than crysis ,GTAIV looks crap works crap and so on ;-)

  18. #18
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Kuwait
    Posts
    1,016
    all these numbers will change when ATI & nVidia release update driver for LP2

    When i first palyed BFBC2 i got 30 FPS average with 19xx driver , but i got +60 FPS with 2xx driver .
    Gaming rig;
    ASUS RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION
    I7-4390K
    G.SKILL Trident X 16GB 2400
    Intel 530 240GB
    2x Asus GTX780
    Corsair AX1200
    HP ZR30w 30
    Win 8.1 pro
    Sound rig;
    Auzen X-Fi H.T. HD --> Yulong D100 MKII --> D-7100

  19. #19
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    1,940
    Quote Originally Posted by RaV[666] View Post
    Are there any screenies comparing diff dxpaths +/- levels of tesselation ?
    Recent optimalizations with games are becoming pretty crap...
    Metro looks mediocre and works worse than crysis ,GTAIV looks crap works crap and so on ;-)
    true; people were complaining about crysis' "inefficiency" yet newer games perform even worse with worse looks...
    Core i7 2600k|HD 6950|8GB RipJawsX|2x 128gb Samsung SSD 830 Raid0|Asus Sabertooth P67
    Seasonic X-560|Corsair 650D|2x WD Red 3TB Raid1|WD Green 3TB|Asus Xonar Essence STX


    Core i3 2100|HD 7770|8GB RipJawsX|128gb Samsung SSD 830|Asrock Z77 Pro4-M
    Bequiet! E9 400W|Fractal Design Arc Mini|3x Hitachi 7k1000.C|Asus Xonar DX


    Dell Latitude E6410|Core i7 620m|8gb DDR3|WXGA+ Screen|Nvidia Quadro NVS3100
    256gb Samsung PB22-J|Intel Wireless 6300|Sierra Aircard MC8781|WD Scorpio Blue 1TB


    Harman Kardon HK1200|Vienna Acoustics Brandnew|AKG K240 Monitor 600ohm|Sony CDP 228ESD

  20. #20
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Aarhus, Denmark
    Posts
    314
    Quote Originally Posted by brandinb View Post
    A clear showing of the Fermi's faster tessellation performance. Overall looks very impressive graphically and doesnt seem to perform to bad.
    I don't think it looks "very impressive graphically". I honestly think DX9 looks just as good as DX11 in this demo. The DX11 part just looks overdone. There is waaaaaaay to much tessellation used and I suspect the reason is to make sure NV cards looks better. In some part of the demo only the water looks different when running DX9 vs DX11, but still the frame rate is much lower on DX11 which it shouldn't be unless they went overboard with tessellation. From a developer point of view they must have been carried away with all the tessellation power of the Fermi architecture.
    AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
    ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XTX Phantom Gaming OC
    Asus ROG Strix B550-F Gaming Motherboard
    Corsair RM1000x SHIFT PSU
    32 GB DDR4 @3800 MHz CL16 (4 x 8 GB)

    1x WD Black SN850 1 TB
    1 x Samsung 960 250 GB
    2 x Samsung 860 1 TB
    1x Segate 16 TB HDD

    Dell G3223Q 4K UHD Monitor
    Running Windows 11 Pro x64 Version 23H2 build 22631.2506

    Smartphone : Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

  21. #21
    Xtremely Kool
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,875
    Quote Originally Posted by Carfax View Post
    Not in DX11. I just ran the benchmark and I got 40.8 average at 2560x1600 MSx4AA, everything on high including DX11 @ 850/1700/4200..

    I checked MSI afterburner afterwards and only one GPU was being fully utilized. There was a bit of activity of the second GPU, but nothing like what you'd expect with true SLi.

    Not surprising though, considering this is a new benchmark.
    http://www.nvidia.co.uk/object/nvidi...driver-uk.html
    This version of the NVIDIA profile update should be used with v258.96 WHQL display driver or later.

    It adds support for the following PC game:

    * Lost Planet 2
    Give that ago.

  22. #22
    Xtremely Kool
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,875
    Quote Originally Posted by Loque View Post
    I love these over the top capcom games :p

    Is Bayonetta coming for the pc as well ?

    edit: (oh wait, capcom didn't make bayonetta but still... do want )
    Me want too.
    Anyway DarkSiders is coming to the PC in Sept.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Addict Chrono Detector's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,142
    I'm getting an average of 49 FPS on my GTX 480 at 1920x1080, everything on full settings including AA on DX11. Haven't tried DX9, I remember running the first Lost Planet and running on DX10 compared to DX9 will give you lower framerates, WTF
    AMD Threadripper 12 core 1920x CPU OC at 4Ghz | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 motherboard | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 RAM | Gigabyte 11GB GTX 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme GPU | SilverStone Strider Platinum 1000W Power Supply | Crucial 1050GB MX300 SSD | 4TB Western Digital HDD | 60" Samsung JU7000 4K UHD TV at 3840x2160

  24. #24

  25. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    EU
    Posts
    318
    So it looks like it utilizes 6 cores, nice.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •