Quote Originally Posted by flippin_waffles View Post
Other than the ever popular, "as soon as we get the screwdrivers and pliers out to 'fine tune' this sucker. Its no good the way it is", that seems to be the standard response from the blue team
Surely it isn't that difficult to understand the increased complexity of having a second processor on die, constantly regulating which features of the larger processor are active, allocating power and frequency among these features, etc? And that this complexity results in a greater percentage of performance being determined by the "program" this second processor follows?